Trial Run for Dogs in Resort Rooms

Do you think dogs should be allowed in guests' rooms?


  • Total voters
    1,260
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Found it interesting-somebody reported elsewhere that they talked to a CM and currently Disney has One, count it ONE pet dog on property (at the AoA). My guess is Disney will have a couple dozen Dogs or less on property at any given time. Given time I think people will find that the dog policy will be no big deal. We just need to give it that time.

That's incredibly hard to believe since pet dogs have been allowed at FW for years. October at FW is highly coveted, and guests are known to stay for extended periods of time. So, no doubt in my mind there's more than one pet dog on property.

Also, the policy just started 2 days ago with 48 hr notice, from what I understand. I'd assume people already had plans in place for local kennels/pet sitters...or don't have the $50-$75 per night to cough up, travel space, proper vaccinations, etc.
 
So we are now a few days into the trial, and the public outcry on social media and via communications directly to Disney has taken everyone by surprise - heck, it even took me aback, and I know how vocal Disney fans can be. I think it's safe to say that Disney completely underestimated the passion that many people would have on this subject, and the initial plans are being modified and policies rewritten on the fly at the moment. This process will probably remain fluid over the next few weeks, and Disney is closely monitoring and listening to the feedback and will continue to adjust procedures to try to make this trial work for everyone.

Initially, as will have been seen from the printed Dog Relief Area maps, it was intended that all these happy fluffy pets (which everyone would surely like) would be permitted in any type of guest booking at Riverside (which is the only resort I can directly comment on) and the early announcements did state that the whole resort - barring certain areas such as food & beverage and swimming pools - would be canine accessible as long as the animals were kept under control and on a leash. However over the last 48 hours that intent has been severely trimmed back and they are now aiming to try to restrict dogs to only Standard and Garden View rooms, and the current intention from the room inventory department at Riverside is to use building 24 as much as possible for any guests who book to stay with their pets. This building is well away from the common areas, is located right next to the parking lot to make getting pets to and from rooms easier, and has a nice grassy area nearby to allow dogs to be exercised.

However, although the telephone Reservations Center is now advising guests who wish to bring dogs with them that this will only be possible for Standard and Garden View rooms, the initial announcements - and even the currently posted wording on the Disney website - do not require guests to book that way, nor to preregister their dogs. Thus it is entirely possible that people who have booked for other room categories using the Disney website, via travel agents, through Expedia, etc. will simply show up at the front desk accompanied by their pet(s) and ask to pay the daily fee. This could mean that, in the short term at least, dogs will still need to be accommodated in other areas of the resort in order to comply with existing bookings. This will of course be closely monitored and subsequent deep-cleans arranged for any affected rooms, but at this stage it cannot be guaranteed that other areas of the resort will remain completely dog-free.

I have reached out to my contacts at Riverside who have said that so far (i.e. in the first three days of the program) they have not yet had a single dog staying at the resort. Over the next seven days there are currently just four one-night reservations with associated comments indicating that the guest plans to bring a dog with them, against more than 100 comments over the same seven-day period asking to be assigned to a room away from the dog friendly areas. Those four one-night reservations are apparently all from local Florida residents, and personally I would not be at all surprised to find that some or all of them turn out to be from social media aware guests, or even bloggers or website owners, testing out the new policies for themselves. If there have been any booking cancellations because of this new policy then they have already been replaced with new reservations, as Riverside is either sold out or very close to it for the rest of the month.

Please remember however that we are still only three days into a year-long trial period and there is plenty of time for any of the above information to change in line with practical needs and guest comments and experiences.

I have updated my FAQ page with all the latest information and will continue to note changes there, http://www.portorleans.org/faqs.php#Dogs

[I've posted this here as well as the (very!) long dogs thread, as important information is just getting lost in there]

Andre
 
I have not read all 124 pages but I have a couple of questions of my own. How is MCO airport going to adjust to people bringing pets on airplanes? I can't recall too many areas to accommodate Fido after a long flight. Then there is the issue of transportation to the resorts. Are pets going to be allowed on Magic Express? Then there could be the discrimination angle of non-tradition "pets". Anybody for, oh, pot belly pigs, reptiles, hamsters, rabbits, etc.... Give some people and inch and they will take a mile.
 
I have not read all 124 pages but I have a couple of questions of my own. How is MCO airport going to adjust to people bringing pets on airplanes? I can't recall too many areas to accommodate Fido after a long flight. Then there is the issue of transportation to the resorts. Are pets going to be allowed on Magic Express? Then there could be the discrimination angle of non-tradition "pets". Anybody for, oh, pot belly pigs, reptiles, hamsters, rabbits, etc.... Give some people and inch and they will take a mile.

Yes. There are allowed on the Magic Express.
 
Again STATISTICALLY the poll is invalid. It can't be reproduced. Let's take the "fact" that it can't be minipulated-if you click into the thread and aren't logged in the results are displayed (with out a voting choice)- by displaying results in this manner is going to dissuade people from logging in and voting if they feel their vote won't matter -thus allowing one side a wider margin. We see the same thing in actual voting-when polling shows one candidate having a significant advantage less people turn out at the poll to vote in general (and it is even more repressed for the disadvantaged side)

And as I said upthread, the number of respondents is nowhere near enough to be statistically relevant for the number of people who visit WDW.

Is it representative of the people who visit the resort board of a Disney site and who are interested in what a trial run for dogs in WDW resorts is like? Probably. But it's not STATISTICALLY relevant.
 
I don't think anyone has been particularly welcomed or 'un-welcomed' on either side of the argument. There are more posts on the "against" side, but that doesn't equate to being welcomed. I haven't necessarily felt welcomed all the way, but I persevered because this is important to me. I think people against the new policy may be more motivated because they have a lot more to lose in relation to this.

If there's been hyperbole or hysteria it's been a little on both sides. (Sometimes, one simply in how it responds to the other.)

There have certainly been misinterpretations and twisting of words on both sides, sometimes voiced from other threads (I won't give examples - I'm trying to be broad, not personal.)

None of us can know for sure what other people think or know enough to dismiss another's thoughts or experiences. (Again - on either side of this discussion.) ...If I could read minds, I'd use it to read Disney decision-makers' minds! :D

I'm grateful the DIS enabled and allowed this discussion. There have been friendly and helpful posts here, I hope they don't get drowned out.

And to be personal just for a moment, it's my direct experience that if you like dogs, but have to avoid them, you're getting less and less of a voice about it in society generally, so it was nice to have more of one here for a while and chat about it.
 
Will do. I'm not letting this go. I was booked split stay at..wait for it...AoA and POR. I love dogs and cats but dammit I spend the money to have a pet service come to my home 3x a day while I'm gone. Once I looked at the maps showing the locations of the dog run areas I knew it was all BS. They tried to tell me my POR Royal Room was "guaranteed" not to be impacted by the dog walk areas. Take a look at the map. Panterre Place is a dog area. Liar liar pants on fire!
Oh dear, I hope today's call goes better, and a little pixie dust comes your way.
 
So we are now a few days into the trial, and the public outcry on social media and via communications directly to Disney has taken everyone by surprise - heck, it even took me aback, and I know how vocal Disney fans can be. I think it's safe to say that Disney completely underestimated the passion that many people would have on this subject, and the initial plans are being modified and policies rewritten on the fly at the moment. This process will probably remain fluid over the next few weeks, and Disney is closely monitoring and listening to the feedback and will continue to adjust procedures to try to make this trial work for everyone.

Initially, as will have been seen from the printed Dog Relief Area maps, it was intended that all these happy fluffy pets (which everyone would surely like) would be permitted in any type of guest booking at Riverside (which is the only resort I can directly comment on) and the early announcements did state that the whole resort - barring certain areas such as food & beverage and swimming pools - would be canine accessible as long as the animals were kept under control and on a leash. However over the last 48 hours that intent has been severely trimmed back and they are now aiming to try to restrict dogs to only Standard and Garden View rooms, and the current intention from the room inventory department at Riverside is to use building 24 as much as possible for any guests who book to stay with their pets. This building is well away from the common areas, is located right next to the parking lot to make getting pets to and from rooms easier, and has a nice grassy area nearby to allow dogs to be exercised.

However, although the telephone Reservations Center is now advising guests who wish to bring dogs with them that this will only be possible for Standard and Garden View rooms, the initial announcements - and even the currently posted wording on the Disney website - do not require guests to book that way, nor to preregister their dogs. Thus it is entirely possible that people who have booked for other room categories using the Disney website, via travel agents, through Expedia, etc. will simply show up at the front desk accompanied by their pet(s) and ask to pay the daily fee. This could mean that, in the short term at least, dogs will still need to be accommodated in other areas of the resort in order to comply with existing bookings. This will of course be closely monitored and subsequent deep-cleans arranged for any affected rooms, but at this stage it cannot be guaranteed that other areas of the resort will remain completely dog-free.

I have reached out to my contacts at Riverside who have said that so far (i.e. in the first three days of the program) they have not yet had a single dog staying at the resort. Over the next seven days there are currently just four one-night reservations with associated comments indicating that the guest plans to bring a dog with them, against more than 100 comments over the same seven-day period asking to be assigned to a room away from the dog friendly areas. Those four one-night reservations are apparently all from local Florida residents, and personally I would not be at all surprised to find that some or all of them turn out to be from social media aware guests, or even bloggers or website owners, testing out the new policies for themselves. If there have been any booking cancellations because of this new policy then they have already been replaced with new reservations, as Riverside is either sold out or very close to it for the rest of the month.

Please remember however that we are still only three days into a year-long trial period and there is plenty of time for any of the above information to change in line with practical needs and guest comments and experiences.

I have updated my FAQ page with all the latest information and will continue to note changes there, http://www.portorleans.org/faqs.php#Dogs

[I've posted this here as well as the (very!) long dogs thread, as important information is just getting lost in there]

Andre
Thank you so much for working hard to keep us informed.
 
The article states only certain rooms and certain sections of those resorts chosen for this trial will be used as pet friendly. There should be no issues for those with allergies. Also, you can stay at a Disney resort that is pet free.

Many other resorts are pet friendly including Universal resorts.

I have travelled with my dog for many years and stayed at various brand resorts; she has been in 38 states so far.

It's about time Disney did this for their dog lovers.

I will definitely go to Disney more often, now.

I was going to mention that as well. I was worried about my room smelling like dog when I stayed at the Universal resorts but it's a non issue. The pet rooms are on the first floor in their own wing. I did see a couple dogs being walked near the back of the resort and it didn't bother me at all. Total non issue.
 
My question is,why after all these years,Disney decided "Wow-we need dogs in our Resorts!"?

Is some large powerful entity putting pressure on Disney to do this?

I LOVE dogs,but don't want to worry about stepping in an "accident'(and they will happen and won't be cleaned up all the time)while on my MAGICAL vacay!

I talked to several Resort Custodial CMs who were still "reeling" from "dealing with dog poop" during Irma.

Isn't the answer to create a DOG ONLY Resort?
 
Based on recent reports on adjustments being made by Disney management to their ridiculously wrong-headed dog policy, it is good to see that at least some sanity is beginning to return to their minds with what appears to be new adjustments and restrictions to the policy. In addition to these new adjustments and restrictions, hopefully the new dog policy will be completely terminated by the end of the trial period, or before. Even if my favourite Disney resort hotel is now a Dog Resort, at least the outrage about what has happened to the new Disney Dog Resorts (formerly known as Riverside, Yacht Club, AoA, Cabins) may have saved other Disney resorts from becoming Dog Resorts in the future. I do not want to spend thousands of dollars to have a vacation with other people's dogs.
 
Last edited:
Based on recent reports on adjustments being made by Disney management to their ridiculously wrong-headed dog policy, it is good to see that at least some sanity is beginning to return to their minds with what appears to be new adjustments and restrictions to the policy. In addition to these new adjustments and restrictions, hopefully the new dog policy will be completely terminated by the end of the trial period, or before. Even if my favourite Disney resort hotel is now a Dog Resort, at least the outrage about what has happened to the new Disney Dog Resorts (formerly known as Riverside, Yacht Club, AoA, Cabins) may have saved other Disney resorts from becoming Dog Resorts in the future. I do not want to spend thousands of dollars to have a vacation with other people's dogs.
Most of us spend thousands. Some of us spend tens of thousands throughout the year & most of us have to put up with “other ppl’s” something or other during our trips. It’s the nature of being in public.
 
My question is,why after all these years,Disney decided "Wow-we need dogs in our Resorts!"? ... Isn't the answer to create a DOG ONLY Resort?

Yes! I agree! Disney, build a new Disney pet resort hotel designed and constructed specifically for guests with pets. Make it a resort that guests with pets will love. Let the rest of us spend our thousands of dollars on a Disney vacation without having to share that vacation with other people's dogs, and return our favourite Disney resorts from their new status as Dog Resorts to their previous status as Riverside, Yacht Club, AoA and Cabins.
 
I will be staying at the Yacht Club early next year, so I sent an e-mail expressing my displeasure about the dog friendly policy on Monday. I was astonished to receive a call yesterday from a very nice lady at Disney and she couldn't be more sympathetic. After talking with her about my previous experience with a vicious dog, she assured me that it would be noted on my reservation and that my room would be far away from any dog-friendly area and that the areas for dogs would be well segregated from the rest of the resort. I definitely feel better and will stay at the Yacht Club and hope for the best. The woman I spoke too seemed absolutely exhausted, I could tell she had probably been on the phone all day being yelled at. Let's remember the Cast Members on the phone are not the ones making the decisions and that they are taking the brunt of the anger. After the phone call I had with this woman, I know they are getting the message at Disney.
 
So we are now a few days into the trial, and the public outcry on social media and via communications directly to Disney has taken everyone by surprise - heck, it even took me aback, and I know how vocal Disney fans can be. I think it's safe to say that Disney completely underestimated the passion that many people would have on this subject, and the initial plans are being modified and policies rewritten on the fly at the moment. This process will probably remain fluid over the next few weeks, and Disney is closely monitoring and listening to the feedback and will continue to adjust procedures to try to make this trial work for everyone.

Initially, as will have been seen from the printed Dog Relief Area maps, it was intended that all these happy fluffy pets (which everyone would surely like) would be permitted in any type of guest booking at Riverside (which is the only resort I can directly comment on) and the early announcements did state that the whole resort - barring certain areas such as food & beverage and swimming pools - would be canine accessible as long as the animals were kept under control and on a leash. However over the last 48 hours that intent has been severely trimmed back and they are now aiming to try to restrict dogs to only Standard and Garden View rooms, and the current intention from the room inventory department at Riverside is to use building 24 as much as possible for any guests who book to stay with their pets. This building is well away from the common areas, is located right next to the parking lot to make getting pets to and from rooms easier, and has a nice grassy area nearby to allow dogs to be exercised.

However, although the telephone Reservations Center is now advising guests who wish to bring dogs with them that this will only be possible for Standard and Garden View rooms, the initial announcements - and even the currently posted wording on the Disney website - do not require guests to book that way, nor to preregister their dogs. Thus it is entirely possible that people who have booked for other room categories using the Disney website, via travel agents, through Expedia, etc. will simply show up at the front desk accompanied by their pet(s) and ask to pay the daily fee. This could mean that, in the short term at least, dogs will still need to be accommodated in other areas of the resort in order to comply with existing bookings. This will of course be closely monitored and subsequent deep-cleans arranged for any affected rooms, but at this stage it cannot be guaranteed that other areas of the resort will remain completely dog-free.

I have reached out to my contacts at Riverside who have said that so far (i.e. in the first three days of the program) they have not yet had a single dog staying at the resort. Over the next seven days there are currently just four one-night reservations with associated comments indicating that the guest plans to bring a dog with them, against more than 100 comments over the same seven-day period asking to be assigned to a room away from the dog friendly areas. Those four one-night reservations are apparently all from local Florida residents, and personally I would not be at all surprised to find that some or all of them turn out to be from social media aware guests, or even bloggers or website owners, testing out the new policies for themselves. If there have been any booking cancellations because of this new policy then they have already been replaced with new reservations, as Riverside is either sold out or very close to it for the rest of the month.

Please remember however that we are still only three days into a year-long trial period and there is plenty of time for any of the above information to change in line with practical needs and guest comments and experiences.

I have updated my FAQ page with all the latest information and will continue to note changes there, http://www.portorleans.org/faqs.php#Dogs

[I've posted this here as well as the (very!) long dogs thread, as important information is just getting lost in there]

Andre

Thanks Andre! Glad they are listening and adjusting.

It doesn't surprise me that VERY few rooms have dogs yet, since yesterday was maybe 2-3 days into the trial that was only announced this week. People just haven't had times to adjust plans to bring dogs yet. It would seem that only the locals would be able to do this, like you said. I would guess a good month or so before this even begins to have any momentum.

Personally... We've only every had standard and garden view rooms (Alligator Bayou that hold 5), so I'm not liking that those are the only rooms dogs will be allowed in, but if it's confined to building 24 then I'm ok with that. Still don't want random peoples dogs all around the resort path areas though for numerous reasons.

Hopefully the amount of guests taking advantage of this policy is low, is this was an unnecessary move by Disney. It's clearly unpopular here on the Dis. (based on this, and another more descriptive poll started yesterday)

Dan
 
From what I have read disney has not given a size limitation, has anyone seen this changed yet? Someone on another thread said I could not bring my Greyhounds (as I stated in that post and from signature below I have four so would not leave two and bring two).

I also have gotten a response back from a svp at Disney(email sent to Disney president so I am sure was filtered down to svp) thanking me for my support of the trial policy. In it I stated we were stockholders and dvc members and I also thought Disney could have give more than two days notice on the announcement. Additionally told them to be sure and enforce the rules as many would be looking for this trial policy to fail.
 
I
From what I have read disney has not given a size limitation, has anyone seen this changed yet? Someone on another thread said I could not bring my Greyhounds (as I stated in that post and from signature below I have four so would not leave two and bring two).

I also have gotten a response back from a svp at Disney(email sent to Disney president so I am sure was filtered down to svp) thanking me for my support of the trial policy. In it I stated we were stockholders and dvc members and I also thought Disney could have give more than two days notice on the announcement. Additionally told them to be sure and enforce the rules as many would be looking for this trial policy to fail.
I haven't seen the size policy change but would not be surprised if it did. Same for breed restrictions.

I wonder if you and I cancel each other out LOL? We are also stockholders and DVC members ( with greyhounds lol) and are against the policy and hoping it fails.
 
Found it interesting-somebody reported elsewhere that they talked to a CM and currently Disney has One, count it ONE pet dog on property (at the AoA). My guess is Disney will have a couple dozen Dogs or less on property at any given time. Given time I think people will find that the dog policy will be no big deal. We just need to give it that time.

I’m not at all surprised that there’s only one dog there right now. This policy was JUST put into effect, and was only announced 2 days ahead of time. I would venture to guess that the vast majority of people still don’t know about it, and even if they did, they probably had already made other arrangements for their pet prior to leaving.

I was also under the impression (although I could be wrong) that you had to “declare” your dog at the time of booking for a couple of reasons. First, so that the pricing will be correct and second, so that you’re placed in the dog area of the resort. There hasn’t been time for very many people to book with a dog just yet.

I’d like to see what happens when more people know about this and have had time to book.
 
There are VERY few options for families of 5 people if you take both Art of Animation and Port Orleans Riverside out of the mix. It simply isn't true that there are 20+ additional options.
Yes, you are correct, for a family of five the options are very limited on site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top