I mean, can we be a little reasonable here? Teachers have to provide the most basic supplies for their classrooms, like pencils and paper, and people really think there is untapped financial assets to outfit EVERY school with metal detectors and a couple full time armed guards? Ha! It was 98 in my room yesterday. I don't have heat in the winter. No way they're going to put in metal detectors if they don't give us heat or A/C.
And to those who say it is worth it to sacrifice some programs to protect the students, I just can't get behind that perspective.
Why punish potential victims to make it more difficult for a shooter when we could make it more difficult for the potential shooter to lay his hands on a hugely destructive weapon? It is like saying women should wear chastity belts to prevent attacks from rapists. You don't go after the victims or potential victims.
"Sorry we had to cut music and art, but hey, look at that metal detector." I retire at the end of next year. I know if they don't replace me (instrumental music), they have to hire 2 teachers to take on the class load. Or in reality they'll maybe hire one and then make class sizes 40-45.
And, what's next? After shooters are deterred from public schools? Private schools? Malls? Churches (already a target)?
The issue isn't the safety of the schools, it is the ease in which it is for a deranged individual to get such destructive weaponry.