To Infinity and Beyond - Becoming a Better DopeyBadger (Comments Welcome)

Alright folks, put those designer hats on and let's hear what you think. This is my "look book" thus far:

View attachment 338117

Outdoor lights (both on the far left), can light covers, hallway cage light, powder room fixture, and LR ceiling fan

View attachment 338118

Closet lights, upstairs hallway lights (the flat circles), and BR fans

View attachment 338125

1st floor Powder room (rustic barn floor OR chevron cottage white?), and upstairs baths (fabric appearance with purple, blues, and greys / the cabinet in G's bathroom will be navy blue with rose gold handles).

View attachment 338120

Outdoor of house with 16 in light, wood appearance door (orange cedar color), green siding, tan stone, red cedar shakes, and a dark brown roof.

View attachment 338121

View attachment 338122

Kitchen appliances (stainless steel), mahogany colored floor, countertops???, cabinet color???

View attachment 338123

More countertop options...

So, what do you think fellow designers?

Ok, so for the outdoor lights, I'm not in love with the smaller one (snip below)... I think I just don't love the glasswork on it, and that's obviously just personal preference. I otherwise love those selections.

upload_2018-7-20_14-39-56.png

For your closet/upstairs/etc. lights... you're mixing styles quite a bit. Especially when you consider your outside and bathroom lights. I'd encourage you to see if you can find something a little more rustic or at least change the silver/chrom to a rubbed bronze or something. To be clear, I personally like the style quite a bit (I have a few similiar ones in my house), it just seems a little mixed.

Love everything in your bathroom picture (huge fan of the blue). My only thought is that while I LOVE chevron, I do worry that it's a fad and that it would date the house if I sold down the road. Hopefully not a huge concern for you guys (I hope this is your forever home!) but something I'd think about if I were renovating my home.

Huge fan of your outdoor look. I bet it looks AMAZING in winter, decked out for the holidays and with snow around it.

For appliances, I like them all... but no desire to have a water/ice machine in your fridge? And no need/want for french doors on it? FWIW, I have an LG dishwasher and an LG washing machine and I love them both. Especially b/c my dishwasher has a third rack... SO great for things like cooking utensils!

For counters, I like the lower right of your second countertop photo best (this one):

upload_2018-7-20_14-47-33.png

If it were my kitchen, I'd go with the simple grey cabinetry. I like the rustic look but between your lights and your floor, plus the grain on your counters, I'd worry that you were mixing texture and color too much.

Totally loving what you have going so far, please don't take the very minor points as any kind of criticism of taste... all my comments are just personal preference and stuff I've thought about in the years I've had to daydream my own reno :).
 
I love designing....if you are asking about powder room floor, I like the rustic barn floor. We have tile in our bath and kitchen and we have heated floors. Soooo worth it...especially with cold Wisconsin winters! Look into the heated mats at Lowe’s or Home depot at least in front of toilet and sink. Just my 2 cents!
I like the lighter grey shaker style cabinet but not sure of the counter? it’s hard to tell on small samples with color variation but I think my fav is the bottom right corner.
So exciting!!! We’ve not built a house yet but done way too much remodeling! Some day I’ll get to start from scratch!
 


So I will put my astronomer hat on and encourage you to go with dark-sky-friendly outdoor lighting. A lot of outdoor lights (including samples you posted) disperse a large fraction of their light up into the sky (causing light pollution) or into the eyes of people (causing glare, which can prevent you from seeing that burglar you have the lights for) or into your neighbor's house/yard. Light pollution not only causes everyone to be able to see fewer stars, but research also shows it affects the natural cycles of animals, plants, and humans in a bad way.

You can find out more about lighting that can light the area you want while minimizing light pollution here: http://darksky.org/lighting/residentialbusiness-lighting/ There is also a lot more info about the negative effects of light pollution and poor lighting choices on crime rates, nature, and health on other parts of the website.

Seems reasonable. So the outdoor light seems to be at the 90 degree or less. But since it has a glass face I should try and find lower wattage bulbs that will be softer in appearance. Does this sound about right?

Love the outdoor siding/trim/lights! Building can be such fun when it is not super stressful!

Also, congrats on 10,000 miles!

Thanks! There have been some definite ups and downs thus far, but things have gone well.

Ok, so for the outdoor lights, I'm not in love with the smaller one (snip below)... I think I just don't love the glasswork on it, and that's obviously just personal preference. I otherwise love those selections.

upload_2018-7-20_14-39-56-png.338161

Agreed. It's a cheap choice to try and stay on budget. It's only one and by the backdoor (so we'd be the only ones to actually see it frequently). But definitely agreed.

For your closet/upstairs/etc. lights... you're mixing styles quite a bit. Especially when you consider your outside and bathroom lights. I'd encourage you to see if you can find something a little more rustic or at least change the silver/chrom to a rubbed bronze or something. To be clear, I personally like the style quite a bit (I have a few similiar ones in my house), it just seems a little mixed.

I can definitely see it. Steph wanted a bit of a lighter look upstairs. Definitely something to ponder a bit more on.

Love everything in your bathroom picture (huge fan of the blue). My only thought is that while I LOVE chevron, I do worry that it's a fad and that it would date the house if I sold down the road. Hopefully not a huge concern for you guys (I hope this is your forever home!) but something I'd think about if I were renovating my home.

G's excited about that blue/rose gold/fabric tile combo.

Steph's all about that chevron. Back when we were going to reno the old house she wanted to do like the whole thing in chevron. I'm not even sure it'll happen because it's a 5.5x5.5 powder room and the tile is 4x1 (faux appearance of chevron when it's actually just one big tile, quite slick).

Huge fan of your outdoor look. I bet it looks AMAZING in winter, decked out for the holidays and with snow around it.

Such a great call on the winter look. It should really pop on a while background.

For appliances, I like them all... but no desire to have a water/ice machine in your fridge? And no need/want for french doors on it? FWIW, I have an LG dishwasher and an LG washing machine and I love them both. Especially b/c my dishwasher has a third rack... SO great for things like cooking utensils!

The fridge has the highest probability of failure. So I tried to find an option that would have the least "breaking points". So I'm good without the door water and french door. It does have an ice machine in the drawer.

THIRD Rack! Never had one until we moved in with the SIL. Between her third rack and gas range we made some changes to our plans.

For counters, I like the lower right of your second countertop photo best (this one):

upload_2018-7-20_14-47-33-png.338168

That's one of my choices! Viscon White Granite:

http://www.universalgranite.com/cat...or=&thickness=&name=vis&leftSearch=leftSearch

Surprisingly, Steph's favorite (the dark black and bone white swirl) is also Viscon White Granite just a real rare cut (apparently).

If it were my kitchen, I'd go with the simple grey cabinetry. I like the rustic look but between your lights and your floor, plus the grain on your counters, I'd worry that you were mixing texture and color too much.

Good thought!

Totally loving what you have going so far, please don't take the very minor points as any kind of criticism of taste... all my comments are just personal preference and stuff I've thought about in the years I've had to daydream my own reno :).

No offense at all.

I love designing....if you are asking about powder room floor, I like the rustic barn floor.

That's the more likely option in my opinion.

We have tile in our bath and kitchen and we have heated floors. Soooo worth it...especially with cold Wisconsin winters! Look into the heated mats at Lowe’s or Home depot at least in front of toilet and sink. Just my 2 cents!

Hmm, we'll have to see if we can swing that in the budget.

I like the lighter grey shaker style cabinet but not sure of the counter? it’s hard to tell on small samples with color variation but I think my fav is the bottom right corner.

We'll get to choose our slab. These are just a small portion. The only one you won't find is the black/white swirl because it's at the fabricator's that we'll be using (someone else backed out on a deal).

http://www.universalgranite.com/granite/alexandrita-azul-3cm-19282.html?___SID=U

http://www.universalgranite.com/granite/rocky-mountain-3cm-42301.html?___SID=U

http://www.universalgranite.com/granite/viscon-white-3cm-45277.html?___SID=U

http://www.stone-design.com/product/835/

Oh I loveeeee the first set of lights! I agree with @FredtheDuck on the countertops! I am also obsessed with the bathroom vanity. I just want it all!

:woohoo:

I have no designer hat, so that post completely stresses me out! But it will be fun to see what you and Steph select!!

:thumbsup2
 
I like the viscon white!

I think it's definitely the front runner right now. The question is go for the black and bone white OR the grey with swirls. I think it may come down to price and practicality of matching those colors in the scheme. We will probably go see the other slabs in person to get a fair comparison. We've found pictures of things don't really show all the details.
 


I really like the grey cabinets for the kitchen and that vanity is amazing. I really love that color and think it will look great.

We have not built a house but my in laws did a few years ago and the one piece advice they give people is while price is important don’t compromise on things you really want. They made a few changes that they don’t love and it’s too late now. They also have those same closet lights as you picked. They work well if you are going to a light and neutral palette. Definitely a balancing act for sure.
 
When it starts raining but you keep going because your neighborhood is full of these guys putting up new light poles. And all you can think is Billy saying...

"I'm watching...always watching"
IMG_4201.JPG

Haven't been journaling much but my big 10 miler is tomorrow and today's 6 felt good despite the rain (actually probably because it wasn't super hot)
I have 45 new gels to choose from for my big run tomorrow.
 
I really like the grey cabinets for the kitchen and that vanity is amazing. I really love that color and think it will look great.

:cool1:

We have not built a house but my in laws did a few years ago and the one piece advice they give people is while price is important don’t compromise on things you really want. They made a few changes that they don’t love and it’s too late now. They also have those same closet lights as you picked. They work well if you are going to a light and neutral palette. Definitely a balancing act for sure.

I totally understand. The issue is when that justification is used on the siding, basement height, basement exposure, flooring, cabinets, countertops, lighting, appliances, etc. Once you start to go over on budget on all these things then it'll nickel and dime you. So we're trying to prioritize the things that we absolutely can't change, and then all other things being equal what matters the absolute most. It's a definite balance act.

When it starts raining but you keep going because your neighborhood is full of these guys putting up new light poles. And all you can think is Billy saying...

"I'm watching...always watching"
View attachment 338405

Haven't been journaling much but my big 10 miler is tomorrow and today's 6 felt good despite the rain (actually probably because it wasn't super hot)
I have 45 new gels to choose from for my big run tomorrow.

:lmao:

Always watching.... ::yes::
 
Seems reasonable. So the outdoor light seems to be at the 90 degree or less. But since it has a glass face I should try and find lower wattage bulbs that will be softer in appearance. Does this sound about right?

No, actually the idea is that the bulb shouldn't be visible at all, because that's what causes glare and light loss upward. In your original post where you showed a bunch of pictures of fixtures, I'll use the upper left light as an example. It's like a hanging lantern light, with panes on all four sides. (I don't even know if that's an outdoor light!)

The panes mean that when you look at the light, you're looking directly at the bulb, so it's glarey in your eyes (possibly causing worse vision when you're in the dark approaching it). Also, the panes allow light angles to go up, above head level and toward the sky - maybe not straight up, but you get the idea. This light is not illuminating anything useful - either your porch roof or the tree above or the sky, etc, so it's a waste of electricity and adding to light pollution.

So, you want a fixture with some sort of shade that will direct and reflect all of the light downward, toward the area you're trying to illuminate and will not glare right into the eye (unless you're right under it). Here are some examples that I found in a quick search to show you the idea: https://www.acuitybrands.com/products/detail/318029/american-electric-lighting/series-avpcl2-led-full-cutoff/valiant-led-lantern-full-cutoff (I have no idea what this company is, so I'm not endorsing them in any way!) I would hope there are some companies who have come up with some decent-looking fixtures, but not being the market for this sort of lighting, I really don't know.

At any rate, thanks for taking it into consideration even a little bit. :)
 
No, actually the idea is that the bulb shouldn't be visible at all, because that's what causes glare and light loss upward. In your original post where you showed a bunch of pictures of fixtures, I'll use the upper left light as an example. It's like a hanging lantern light, with panes on all four sides. (I don't even know if that's an outdoor light!)

The panes mean that when you look at the light, you're looking directly at the bulb, so it's glarey in your eyes (possibly causing worse vision when you're in the dark approaching it). Also, the panes allow light angles to go up, above head level and toward the sky - maybe not straight up, but you get the idea. This light is not illuminating anything useful - either your porch roof or the tree above or the sky, etc, so it's a waste of electricity and adding to light pollution.

So, you want a fixture with some sort of shade that will direct and reflect all of the light downward, toward the area you're trying to illuminate and will not glare right into the eye (unless you're right under it). Here are some examples that I found in a quick search to show you the idea: https://www.acuitybrands.com/products/detail/318029/american-electric-lighting/series-avpcl2-led-full-cutoff/valiant-led-lantern-full-cutoff (I have no idea what this company is, so I'm not endorsing them in any way!) I would hope there are some companies who have come up with some decent-looking fixtures, but not being the market for this sort of lighting, I really don't know.

At any rate, thanks for taking it into consideration even a little bit. :)

Makes better sense, I'll see if I can convince the spouse.
 
Thankfully so many ppl on the board have great taste!! You really don’t want my advice... I’m using a 10 seat poker table for my dinning room table w/ a yoga ball and bean bag chairs as my primary seating options lol!! (Though I do have fold up chairs for guest desiring “real” seating options :D)
 
Thankfully so many ppl on the board have great taste!! You really don’t want my advice... I’m using a 10 seat poker table for my dinning room table w/ a yoga ball and bean bag chairs as my primary seating options lol!! (Though I do have fold up chairs for guest desiring “real” seating options :D)

I can appreciate the practical use approach.
 
Makes better sense, I'll see if I can convince the spouse.

Yes, that's the first thing. :) I'm not sure how much there is in the way of attractive fixtures for home lighting. Most efforts are focused on commercial and municipal lighting, since that can really make changes en masse - it's also an easier sell in terms of saving energy.
 
76 Days to Go (Playing Leapfrog with a Unicorn is NEVER a good idea.)

IMG_1693.JPG

Date - Day - Scheduled Workouts (Intervals within desired pace)

7/16/18 - M - OFF
7/17/18 - T - 7 miles @ EA (8:14)
7/18/18 - W - 2 mile WU + 2x2 mile T (6:25) + 5x3 min I (5:53) + 8x400m R (5:27) + 1 mile CD (14/17)
7/19/18 - R - 7 miles @ EA (8:14)
7/20/18 - F - 7 miles @ EA (8:14)
7/21/18 - Sat - 9 miles @ EB (7:42)
7/22/18 - Sun - 3 mile WU + 13.2 mile M Tempo (7/13)

Running duration = 8:05 hours
Running mileage = 58.3 miles
Indoor Virtual Biking duration = n/a hours
Indoor Virtual Biking mileage = n/a miles
Total (training) duration = 8:05 hours
Total (training) mileage = 58.3 miles
Number of running SOS intervals within pace = 21/30 (70%)

Monday

Spent the evening with G at swim class. She's making good progress but definitely has her triggers on what she doesn't want to do. We spent a good bit of time on the past weekend working on jumping into the pool. So we were happy to get over the hump. Only to find that this week they wanted them to jump in at the deep end now. One step forward, but the class took a leap forward. We'll get there at our own pace.

Tuesday

T+D of 152. Easy day at a 8:49 min/mile pace. Kept the focus on the easy side of easy HR (132). Final HR was 132. My right ankle has been a bit sore lately. I usually get an issue every once in a while where my ankle won't "crack" when it rotates. So sometimes it has that "off" feeling. I'm semi-confident it isn't anything more nefarious.

Wednesday

I was really excited about this run. It was my first attempt at triple pacing. Start with Threshold pacing (6:25), then move to the WORST PACE EVER (also known as I pace at 5:53), and then finish off the workout with R pace (5:27). Truly an epic workout. In the past, I might do a 2x2 at T and that was a workout. Or a 5x3 min at I and that was a workout. Or a 8x400m at R and that was a workout. But this devastating workout was a combination of three individual workouts into one mega one. I've never been great at the I pace, so I was really interested to test out where my current conditioning is. You can't go through the motions on those I pace workouts. You either have it or you don't.

T pace = 6:25 + 10 sec (first half of Daniels plan adj) + 5-3% adjustment for T+D = 6:47-6:57
I pace = 5:53 + 5-3% adjustment = 6:04-6:13
R pace = 5:27 (41.0 sec)

The T+D ranged from a 152 at the start down to a 139. But honestly, I didn't actually believe it. It didn't feel like a T+D of 152. It felt more like the 130-140s. So I aimed for the faster end of the spectrum.

T pace splits = 6:51, 6:48, 6:44, 6:45

Felt in control during these. Was definitely feeling it towards the end of the second interval, but I was able to hold on. HR was around 153 which is just on the upper edge of M Tempo. Makes sense since we're intentionally adding a bit of time since this is the first half of the plan. With a goal pace of 6:47, I was really happy with this portion of the run. But the I PACE WAS NEXT!!!

I pace splits = 5:54. 5:58, 5:57, 6:02, 5:52

Not going to mince words about this one. Since we moved, I've struggled to find a nice circle loop to do these types of paces on. So there was some elevation to play with. That only compounds the difficulty of the I pace. But I had a bit of an audience around the park and I wasn't going to let my onlookers down. Very VERY happy with this portion of the run. With an adjusted pace goal of 6:04, I definitely crushed this pace. Averaged a 5:57. I was feeling it towards the end and was ready to see if I could hold on for the R pace.

R pace splits = 39.3, 44.5, 40.7, 42.5, 42.5, 38.0, 42.7, 41.0

Moved to a flat straightaway (at least as close as I can get). Set myself and I was OFF. Still haven't adjusted my watch to display "seconds" so I wasn't quite sure what my splits were at time of. So a bit tough to make adjustments on the fly. That 38.0 seconds is because I got challenged by a kid who had been watching. He was able to keep up with me for the first 50-75m but faded late. An admirable job. My left hamstring did twinge a bit during the R pace. I questioned whether I should continue but pressed on because it wasn't holding me back. I've had better judgement at other times in my life...

Anyways. Extremely solid workout. A definite confidence booster in what was good conditions, but definitely not ideal.

Thursday

Right ankle still bothering me. Then when I was doing my pre-run dynamic WU it became quite clear my hamstring was screaming. Kind of like the feeling I had back at Dopey 2018 pre-races. Just put in a really strong workout, and my legs weren't quite fully prepared for it. Decided to keep it easy and not push it.

Average pace 9:21 with no desire to go a second faster. HR was 123 which says it all. Cardiovascularly I could handle more (123 vs 132 usual HR), but muscularly I was just not in the mood. Easy isn't easy unless it feels easy.

Friday

Right ankle still bothering me and now the left hamstring still needed some work too. The hamstring felt better, but it was important to continue to focus on easy. Sunday was going to be another mega day and I needed to be ready. Mother nature decided to not play nice though. An ABSOLUTE DOWNPOUR. I was soaked within minutes of being outside. But you never know what race day is going to be like. So onward and upward.

Average pace of 8:40 min/mile, HR of 128 (still slower than the easy side of easy). I just wasn't willing to push it anymore because of the rain and the little niggles I've got going on.

Saturday

Finally got some decent sleep. Out the door at 9:10am. Average pace of 7:58 min/mile for a total of 9 miles. Since this was a 90% week, then it meant a non-standard 9 miles on the weekend. Average HR of 138 which is nicely placed given the purpose of the run. Just as the run was coming to a close the wind started to pick up. A little brutal since it was a northern wind which just so happened to be the same direction of the big hill. An omen for tomorrow perhaps?

Sunday

The whole reason I chose to do the Daniels 4 week plan was the focus on really far M Tempo workouts. Well this was it. A 17 miler with 14 miles at M Tempo. The M Tempo workouts have been a nemesis of mine. You'd think I'd be better at them since they're my favorite distance. But once I get up into the 9-10 mile M Tempo workout it usually becomes super tough. So if 9-10 is tough, why not bump that up to 14-15 miles...

I was up at 5am and had my pre-race breakfast. I also prepared two servings of Maurten 320 drink mix. I placed the drinks on the top of my car trunk because I wanted to run by and grab them and keep going. Unlike the majority of my runs where I take a very short break to drink, the goal for this M Tempo was to be a non-stop workout.

T+D was 129 to 132 and cloudy. Given what I've had lately sounds like ideal conditions. However, there was a nice northern wind of 15-20 mph. So almost great conditions. Just got to deal with it.

The right ankle was still bothersome, but the hamstring was feeling closer to 100%.

M Tempo = 6:48 min/mile + 10 seconds (first half) + 2% T+D adjustment = 7:06 goal pace

The WU was uneventful. Things felt pretty good all things considered. I had a lot of confidence and was ready to see some 7:06s, maybe 6:50s, maybe even 6:40s. Time to see what I could do.

M Tempo = 7:17, 7:16, 7:21, 7:21, 7:10, 7:21, 7:29, 7:06, 7:13, 7:28, 7:08, 7:17, 7:17

Average pace = 7:17 min/mile

Heart said "GO!"
Legs said "NO!"
Brain said "Let's compromise and meet in the middle and be consistent."

The first split came in at 7:17 and I was like, alright I can deal with a conservative start. Then the second mile came in and I was like, well maybe this is where I want to be today. Then the third split came in, and I was like yep this is today's pace. So I changed from a goal 7:06 pace to finishing a consistent workout from beginning to end. I was able to hold on to the pace throughout without any stops. Even with a grade adjusted pace of 7:11, I was a bit off from goal pace.

Can't really say why I didn't have it today. Felt a lot like Lakefront 2017 where I had the stuff, but things just didn't line up. There was a big difference between Lakefront 2017 and this workout though. My HR. For Lakefront 2017, I truly was near the maximal (if not past) the marathon HR (in the mid/upper 150s). But today, my HR was actually in a great place. I hit a maximal HR of 152. My normal average HR for marathon's is between 148-152. So a maximal 152 means even on the hills I was never actually pushing "that hard". The average HR at 143 (way below M Tempo). So it says to me I was cardiovascularly capable, but didn't have the muscle/power to make it happen. Probably a combination of bad sleep lately, and didn't eat well enough yesterday. I'm also at Week 5 of the plan so possibly getting that cardio near maximum and the muscle still lagging behind as normal (cardio at 8 weeks and muscle at 12 weeks).

Sometimes when you mess with the unicorn you get the horn.
 
76 Days to Go (Playing Leapfrog with a Unicorn is NEVER a good idea.)

View attachment 338730

Date - Day - Scheduled Workouts (Intervals within desired pace)

7/16/18 - M - OFF
7/17/18 - T - 7 miles @ EA (8:14)
7/18/18 - W - 2 mile WU + 2x2 mile T (6:25) + 5x3 min I (5:53) + 8x400m R (5:27) + 1 mile CD (14/17)
7/19/18 - R - 7 miles @ EA (8:14)
7/20/18 - F - 7 miles @ EA (8:14)
7/21/18 - Sat - 9 miles @ EB (7:42)
7/22/18 - Sun - 3 mile WU + 13.2 mile M Tempo (7/13)

Running duration = 8:05 hours
Running mileage = 58.3 miles
Indoor Virtual Biking duration = n/a hours
Indoor Virtual Biking mileage = n/a miles
Total (training) duration = 8:05 hours
Total (training) mileage = 58.3 miles
Number of running SOS intervals within pace = 21/30 (70%)

Monday

Spent the evening with G at swim class. She's making good progress but definitely has her triggers on what she doesn't want to do. We spent a good bit of time on the past weekend working on jumping into the pool. So we were happy to get over the hump. Only to find that this week they wanted them to jump in at the deep end now. One step forward, but the class took a leap forward. We'll get there at our own pace.

Tuesday

T+D of 152. Easy day at a 8:49 min/mile pace. Kept the focus on the easy side of easy HR (132). Final HR was 132. My right ankle has been a bit sore lately. I usually get an issue every once in a while where my ankle won't "crack" when it rotates. So sometimes it has that "off" feeling. I'm semi-confident it isn't anything more nefarious.

Wednesday

I was really excited about this run. It was my first attempt at triple pacing. Start with Threshold pacing (6:25), then move to the WORST PACE EVER (also known as I pace at 5:53), and then finish off the workout with R pace (5:27). Truly an epic workout. In the past, I might do a 2x2 at T and that was a workout. Or a 5x3 min at I and that was a workout. Or a 8x400m at R and that was a workout. But this devastating workout was a combination of three individual workouts into one mega one. I've never been great at the I pace, so I was really interested to test out where my current conditioning is. You can't go through the motions on those I pace workouts. You either have it or you don't.

T pace = 6:25 + 10 sec (first half of Daniels plan adj) + 5-3% adjustment for T+D = 6:47-6:57
I pace = 5:53 + 5-3% adjustment = 6:04-6:13
R pace = 5:27 (41.0 sec)

The T+D ranged from a 152 at the start down to a 139. But honestly, I didn't actually believe it. It didn't feel like a T+D of 152. It felt more like the 130-140s. So I aimed for the faster end of the spectrum.

T pace splits = 6:51, 6:48, 6:44, 6:45

Felt in control during these. Was definitely feeling it towards the end of the second interval, but I was able to hold on. HR was around 153 which is just on the upper edge of M Tempo. Makes sense since we're intentionally adding a bit of time since this is the first half of the plan. With a goal pace of 6:47, I was really happy with this portion of the run. But the I PACE WAS NEXT!!!

I pace splits = 5:54. 5:58, 5:57, 6:02, 5:52

Not going to mince words about this one. Since we moved, I've struggled to find a nice circle loop to do these types of paces on. So there was some elevation to play with. That only compounds the difficulty of the I pace. But I had a bit of an audience around the park and I wasn't going to let my onlookers down. Very VERY happy with this portion of the run. With an adjusted pace goal of 6:04, I definitely crushed this pace. Averaged a 5:57. I was feeling it towards the end and was ready to see if I could hold on for the R pace.

R pace splits = 39.3, 44.5, 40.7, 42.5, 42.5, 38.0, 42.7, 41.0

Moved to a flat straightaway (at least as close as I can get). Set myself and I was OFF. Still haven't adjusted my watch to display "seconds" so I wasn't quite sure what my splits were at time of. So a bit tough to make adjustments on the fly. That 38.0 seconds is because I got challenged by a kid who had been watching. He was able to keep up with me for the first 50-75m but faded late. An admirable job. My left hamstring did twinge a bit during the R pace. I questioned whether I should continue but pressed on because it wasn't holding me back. I've had better judgement at other times in my life...

Anyways. Extremely solid workout. A definite confidence booster in what was good conditions, but definitely not ideal.

Thursday

Right ankle still bothering me. Then when I was doing my pre-run dynamic WU it became quite clear my hamstring was screaming. Kind of like the feeling I had back at Dopey 2018 pre-races. Just put in a really strong workout, and my legs weren't quite fully prepared for it. Decided to keep it easy and not push it.

Average pace 9:21 with no desire to go a second faster. HR was 123 which says it all. Cardiovascularly I could handle more (123 vs 132 usual HR), but muscularly I was just not in the mood. Easy isn't easy unless it feels easy.

Friday

Right ankle still bothering me and now the left hamstring still needed some work too. The hamstring felt better, but it was important to continue to focus on easy. Sunday was going to be another mega day and I needed to be ready. Mother nature decided to not play nice though. An ABSOLUTE DOWNPOUR. I was soaked within minutes of being outside. But you never know what race day is going to be like. So onward and upward.

Average pace of 8:40 min/mile, HR of 128 (still slower than the easy side of easy). I just wasn't willing to push it anymore because of the rain and the little niggles I've got going on.

Saturday

Finally got some decent sleep. Out the door at 9:10am. Average pace of 7:58 min/mile for a total of 9 miles. Since this was a 90% week, then it meant a non-standard 9 miles on the weekend. Average HR of 138 which is nicely placed given the purpose of the run. Just as the run was coming to a close the wind started to pick up. A little brutal since it was a northern wind which just so happened to be the same direction of the big hill. An omen for tomorrow perhaps?

Sunday

The whole reason I chose to do the Daniels 4 week plan was the focus on really far M Tempo workouts. Well this was it. A 17 miler with 14 miles at M Tempo. The M Tempo workouts have been a nemesis of mine. You'd think I'd be better at them since they're my favorite distance. But once I get up into the 9-10 mile M Tempo workout it usually becomes super tough. So if 9-10 is tough, why not bump that up to 14-15 miles...

I was up at 5am and had my pre-race breakfast. I also prepared two servings of Maurten 320 drink mix. I placed the drinks on the top of my car trunk because I wanted to run by and grab them and keep going. Unlike the majority of my runs where I take a very short break to drink, the goal for this M Tempo was to be a non-stop workout.

T+D was 129 to 132 and cloudy. Given what I've had lately sounds like ideal conditions. However, there was a nice northern wind of 15-20 mph. So almost great conditions. Just got to deal with it.

The right ankle was still bothersome, but the hamstring was feeling closer to 100%.

M Tempo = 6:48 min/mile + 10 seconds (first half) + 2% T+D adjustment = 7:06 goal pace

The WU was uneventful. Things felt pretty good all things considered. I had a lot of confidence and was ready to see some 7:06s, maybe 6:50s, maybe even 6:40s. Time to see what I could do.

M Tempo = 7:17, 7:16, 7:21, 7:21, 7:10, 7:21, 7:29, 7:06, 7:13, 7:28, 7:08, 7:17, 7:17

Average pace = 7:17 min/mile

Heart said "GO!"
Legs said "NO!"
Brain said "Let's compromise and meet in the middle and be consistent."

The first split came in at 7:17 and I was like, alright I can deal with a conservative start. Then the second mile came in and I was like, well maybe this is where I want to be today. Then the third split came in, and I was like yep this is today's pace. So I changed from a goal 7:06 pace to finishing a consistent workout from beginning to end. I was able to hold on to the pace throughout without any stops. Even with a grade adjusted pace of 7:11, I was a bit off from goal pace.

Can't really say why I didn't have it today. Felt a lot like Lakefront 2017 where I had the stuff, but things just didn't line up. There was a big difference between Lakefront 2017 and this workout though. My HR. For Lakefront 2017, I truly was near the maximal (if not past) the marathon HR (in the mid/upper 150s). But today, my HR was actually in a great place. I hit a maximal HR of 152. My normal average HR for marathon's is between 148-152. So a maximal 152 means even on the hills I was never actually pushing "that hard". The average HR at 143 (way below M Tempo). So it says to me I was cardiovascularly capable, but didn't have the muscle/power to make it happen. Probably a combination of bad sleep lately, and didn't eat well enough yesterday. I'm also at Week 5 of the plan so possibly getting that cardio near maximum and the muscle still lagging behind as normal (cardio at 8 weeks and muscle at 12 weeks).

Sometimes when you mess with the unicorn you get the horn.

Very impressive week of training sir!! I’ve noticed the same issue on my Tempo days, legs just can’t give me what I need and then if I try to push it the HR starts to drift too early. It’s making me a little worried, but everything else seems fine and I seem to be progressing.
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top