Colleen27
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
That has gone on for years though. Take football for example. So many people think they are Vince Lombardi. The reality is they wouldn't even do as well as Bert Bell or Hue Jackson.
I don't think it is armchair quarterbacks that people are concerned about. The undermining and discrediting of sound science carried out by people more than qualified to hold the label of "expert" is a rather alarming trend on a lot of fronts right now...
To piggback off that, I’m tired of the “millennials killed applebees” “millennials killed voicemail” bla blah blah
And just the general misunderstanding of what a millennial is. Teenagers are not millennials. High school and middle school-aged teens are not millennials.
OMG, yes! It is like "millennial" has become code for "kids these days", rather than a label for a specific generation.
This may be controversial, but I think the misguided war on plastics in Western countries should end, especially moves that target convenience plastics (ie. straws, lids, carrier bags etc.) which only achieve positive PR and does little to affect 90% of the ocean's plastic waste problem, which is mostly originating from Asia and Africa. I can't help but feel that this whole 'going green' bandwagon is becoming a huge fad, especially given the timing of most announcements that seem to be done off the back of Blue Planet II's popularity, not to mention that some even capitalise on that, feeding into the piety of those calling for such moves based purely on emotion, instead of scientific fact.
My understanding is the country-of-origin part is hard to tease out because so much of our recycling is shipped to Asia for processing. So us using and discarding it fuels their plastic waste stream, on top of the waste they're generating on their own. And frankly, when I applaud local stores for incentivizing reusable bags or even eliminating them altogether, I'm not thinking about the Pacific Ocean. I'm thinking about the bags that wind up tangled in the reeds in the marsh down the road and the ones that wash up on our town's beach.
The way I see it is this: we know plastics are a problem, environmentally. Should it really matter if we can "only" solve 10 percent of the problem? Isn't that better than solving none of it? I do think it is a fad and I don't agree with some of the ways in which it is being acted on, but not all fads are inherently bad. And companies do good things all the time for PR or tax write-offs. The motivation doesn't make the action less valuable.