And see, that's why Disney sells, because (no offense) but the majority of people don't see the flaws in the photos - when you go under their portraits section, several of their photos are blurry/out of focus, have poor lighting, poor composition, very little effort to have everyone looking/smiling (and yes, I'm well aware of just how hard that is, lol), poor edits etc... Even the ones someone posted above, I could list several issues with them, that a true professional photographer would not have made, yet people think those are great. Meanwhile I just sit and shake my head because they clearly have no idea what great photography could actually look like, lol. But again, at the end of the day, most people are just looking at the overall shot (composition and background) and are being distracted by the "Disney!!!", plus have no more experience with photography than your typical snapshots and so to them, it's good. And that's fine. If they're happy with it, I guess that's really all that matters.
As far as the price, I suppose yes, seeing other comments, that depends where you're from. Here, $195 gets you a full blown session with a really good photographer. The wannabe-photographers (similar quality photos as these ones) run about $60-75. So my initial reaction was that this seems overpriced considering what you get for quality. But I suppose for other areas, it's actually reasonable. And there's the "Disney" factor.
