hertamaniac
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2017
Oh yeah, I agree and something the union should watch out for - I wasn't thinking that now they have to work more hours at non-OT rates, more that they wouldn't need to work extra hours to make the same $ (so can get same $ in less hours) if the pay goes up ... so perhaps they give in a bit on the optional OT type things, not that they agree to having to work more hours and now just at the base rate
The other aspect could be a red herring negotiating tool employed by Disney.
If they succeed at reducing/eliminating the OT rates, they can use the current labor for additional hours without having to hire additional resources (work them longer with minimal $ impact). This could be the gambit Disney is trying to achieve. If they can minimize headcount, and it's associated overhead, while still paying a "living wage", they are in an advantageous position (in my opinion). We used an approximate factor of 40% per employee's salary for overhead budgeting.