TheHamm
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
Keep in mind that cadence and stride length are a function of pace. So someone running on the slower end of the spectrum will find their cadence below that 180 number (from Daniels assessment of 1984 Olympic runners who were around 180 spm or more, some were 180 and others 190, 200, etc). Doesn't mean you're doing anything wrong necessarily. Just keep the footfall underneath you. Which means it could be a heel strike, fore strike, or mid-strike. I find it more important that the foot fall underneath your body so that the force of the footfall be more evenly distributed. Keep the steps quick and light.
Cadence, Stride Length, Gait and Pace: The Great Debate
View attachment 337254
https://www.scienceofrunning.com/2011/02/180-isnt-magic-number-stride-rate-and.html?v=7516fd43adaa
Since the Garmin is new, make sure you have the HR zones setup appropriately so you're getting an accurate picture for yourself. I prefer the HRR method which Garmin supports using the Garmin Connect web interface.
Thanks! the stride length * frequency = speed makes sense, and I always love a good plot. I'm not sure how to determine if my stride length is appropriate other than watch myself, which sounds challenging!
Regarding HRR, I do have the default on my watch, and I do not see how to convert from their basic (220-age) *% via garmin connect. However, the equation I found online from mayo clinic was [(220-age-resting hart rate )*%]+RHR. Are you recommending simply use this equation and manually adjust the zones? As my RHR is relatively low, the above does shift the zones down to where I would find myself solidly in the 'zone 3' category,