Would you rather have Mick Jagger

[low-key]

career or Elvis

they both great, one has been going strong for over 50 years, one was the talk of the world, then got a little sad, then it was over

I would love both, but I gotta have Elvis career

 

[Disneylover99]

Mick for sure. He’s got staying power and he’s stayed relatively healthy all these years. He’s still at the top of his game IMO.

 

[low-key]

Mick for sure. He’s got staying power and he’s stayed relatively healthy all these years. He’s still at the top of his game IMO.

yeah, but all over the world there are Elvis impersonators., and 10 untouchable years

 

[Disneylover99]

yeah, but all over the world there are Elvis impersonators., and 10 untouchable years

I’ve never been an Elvis fan. His career is all yours.
Fun fact - my kid’s old babysitter’s husband was an Elvis impersonator

 

[low-key]

I’ve never been an Elvis fan. His career is all yours.
Fun fact - my kid’s old babysitter’s husband was an Elvis impersonator

that is a fun fact, thanks for sharing

 

[Tattylou]

Mick for sure.
I just saw The Stones live in concert on Sunday night - they are still so great! Mick's voice is as strong as ever and he still dances up a storm.

 

[L&Lfan]

Mick Jagger, although there are actually more Elvis songs that I like. The only 2 Stones songs that I really like are Miss You and Emotional Rescue, although I certainly recognize Satisfaction as a true classic.

 

[snappy]

Both are/were great. Elvis more of an innovator IMHO. Mick Jagger was more who we listened to when during my teen years late sixties so I remember more of his music. Never saw either perform.

 

[Floridaman999]

That dying on the toilet thing would make me choose Mick.

 

[low-key]

That dying on the toilet thing would make me choose Mick.

at least you wouldnt poop your pants

 

[Kitty 34]

Mick for sure. He's alive and obviously knows how to stay that way.

 

[Praying Colonel]

Don't know much about Jagger's career or life other than the music and longevity. Elvis was a sad guy personally in a lot of ways. I remember one of the Beatles (George, I think) saying how they felt sorry for Elvis because the Beatles had each other to lean on in the midst of Beatlemania, but Elvis didn't have anyone.

 

[dominiondad]

Saw Mick and company live last week - amazing. For me, I'll take Mick. I like the idea of being part of a band, having partners during the journey. Plus, I wouldn't be dead.

 

[Micca]

Mick for sure, have you seen his house??? Makes Graceland look like an outhouse.

 

[cinnaminny]

I am not into either of these two. But I will say, while the King is iconic, I rarely hear him on the radio. The Stones however are on all the time still.

And yes, I still listen to radio and I listen to everything. My husband has Satellite in his SUV and it drives me bonkers.

 

[Christine]

Mick Jagger. Not an Elvis fan (don't dislike him or anything, just not for me).

 

[Cadiewampus]

yeah, but all over the world there are Elvis impersonators., and 10 untouchable years

Not to mention his movies with Ann Margaret, Shelly Farbares, Mary Ann Mobley, Raquel Welch, Stella Stevens, Barbara Eden and many more. Tough Gig.

 

[luvsJack]

Not a Rolling Stones or Mick Jagger fan at all, not even a little bit.

But could listen to Elvis all day long. If I could choose to have the TALENT of one of them it would be Elvis all the way.

But I wouldn't want either of their careers.

 

[low-key]

Also who really would you rather look like

 

[Floridaman999]

Also who really would you rather look like

I doubt Elvis looks like that now. I guess he could star in an episode of the Walking Dead and rejuvenate his career.