BuckeyeBama
You are stronger than you think.
- Joined
- May 29, 2013
That's cool - not trying to convince you, just stating my opinion.I disagree.
That's cool - not trying to convince you, just stating my opinion.I disagree.
First I'm sure that was truly upsetting for you and your family. Totally understand that and would have felt upset in your shoes as well.
That said, it may be that Disney didn't really respond much once you got home because what you're asking for (changing policies with housekeeping) is something They're probably never really going to give you. When I get complaints about employees or our processes, I cannot share feedback on specific policy changes we make as a result of discilplinary action in reference to employees. So that may be where you're hitting the wall. I take whatever action I need to take based on the information provided, but I can not ever share specifics with anyone outside of my HR partner or my management. All I can do is let the complainant know the issue was noted and that I'll take it from there. There may also be a reluctance to take full responsibility on their part because the housekeeper who came to your room to vacuum seemed to be speculating about how the glass got there. Absent proof or an admittance from the employee, they can't be 100% sure it was a housekeeper either. It may be the most likely (and I am NOT questioning your facts just providing a managers perspective), but it might not be concrete.
It is very important that you spoke up, and I'm not saying they handled it well, but since you're looking for them to change an internal policy you're not going to be privy to their internal response most likely.
You are right, but they probably see the OP as a threat to sue by now and are not likely to want to help her build a case. Just go dark.Not responding at all after requesting more information from the guest is lacking in customer service, IMO.
You are right, but they probably see the OP as a threat to sue by now and are not likely to want to help her build a case. Just go dark.
Due diligence has to be demonstrated once you see a threat, but you don't have to do anything else. I am sure that my companies lawyers would have demanded that all future communication come through them by this point, and they would not likely send a note saying that they received a response. In this technological age, it really isn't necessary. You send an email - they get an email.Then why did they ask her for an accident report in the first place? They pushed the issue by asking her to fill it out. There's no excuse for not - at the very least - confirming receipt of what they asked for.
Things get lost in cyberspace all the time.Due diligence has to be demonstrated once you see a threat, but you don't have to do anything else. I am sure that my companies lawyers would have demanded that all future communication come through them by this point, and they would not likely send a note saying that they received a response. In this technological age, it really isn't necessary. You send an email - they get an email.
My thoughts exactly.I'm not sure why it is so hard to believe that the OP was concerned about this happening to other guests and was hoping she could do something to help make sure no one else had to deal with something similar?
I'm not sure why it is so hard to believe that the OP was concerned about this happening to other guests and was hoping she could do something to help make sure no one else had to deal with something similar?
I'm not sure why it is so hard to believe that the OP was concerned about this happening to other guests and was hoping she could do something to help make sure no one else had to deal with something similar?
Just because it isn't something you would do, doesn't mean the OP is lying about her intentions in going through the process.
I believe her, but I also know that once she has said her piece, her role in this is over. Disney will do what they do after that, and she has no right to know what, if anything, they do.I'm not sure why it is so hard to believe that the OP was concerned about this happening to other guests and was hoping she could do something to help make sure no one else had to deal with something similar?
I never said she should expect to know what the end result is. : i don't think expecting an acknowledgment of receipt of information that Disney requested is thr same thing as expecting to know what, if anything, they do.I believe her, but I also know that once she has said her piece, her role in this is over. Disney will do what they do after that, and she has no right to know what, if anything, they do.
Generally speaking when statements like "which you claim you weren't" - the use of "claim" indicates some level of not fully believing the OP.
If that's not the case, then perhaps different wording would make that more clear.