Just an update- USC and UCLA are officially declining all pending applicants linked to the scandal. They are both reviewing each current student and alumni on a case by case basis. UCLA went as far as to say they may revoke admittance. USC didn’t go into specifics. I wouldn’t be shocked if kids were kicked out if their (non-rigged) test scores and GPAs don’t meet the schools normal threshold. I wouldn’t be shocked if they just suspend people for a semester or require extra credits or classes for graduation either though. UCLA specifically mentioned minors so they may play the role of “well these were kids under 18 and their parents cheated without their knowledge so even though they weren’t qualified we don’t want to punish them for their parents mistakes.” I wonder if kids that were clearly in on it like the Loughlins will get a tougher look.
from usc's current student handbook-
"Students accept the rights and responsibilities of membership in the USC community when they are admitted to the university. In the university, as elsewhere, ignorance is not an acceptable justification for violating community standards. Lack of intent or awareness of university standards normally will not be accepted as excuses for violations and will normally receive the same consequences as deliberate violations."
there's an entire section on how falsified/fraudulent admission applications are dealt with so it's obviously not an isolated occurrence-these students should be dealt with in the manner that their individual schools spell out in their governing materials, the same as anyone else accused of these types of acts.
i personally find it VERY difficult to believe that any of those who were admitted w/fraudulent test scores or under sports they had no to little experience in could in any way be unaware-
what high school student doesn't know something dishonest is going on when for the first time in their lives, for the SOLE purpose of getting special act or sat privileges they are being tested for a learning disability and told (as is stated they were instructed to do in the court documents) "when tested, to be as, to be stupid, not to be as smart..." "...the goal is to be slow, to be not as bright..."? some of these students NEVER took the act or sat tests themselves-stand ins were used-how is a student unaware they never took the actual test?
what high school student doesn't know that it's against the rules to have an SAT proctor sitting with you alone in a room giving you the answers?
if you NEVER played a sport in your life, your high school didn't even offer a particular sport wouldn't you question how out of the blue you were recruited to play at the collegiate level? then you arrive at school perfectly well and fine to learn that you've been excused from all year's athletics because a doctor you've never met provided paperwork saying you were injured over the summer (an injury you know never occurred)?
some of these students may have been minors when they applied but college applications are pretty clear in that an applicant by signing and submitting is attesting that everything they've provided is entirely honest and truthful, and failing in being so results in a fraudulent application. if these 'students' perceive themselves at the level to attend these prestigious schools they should be entirely capable of reading the paragraph immediately above where they've signed their name.