It's easy to fall into this trap. I'll be first to admit that I do it.
When shampoo/soap dispensers were going to be replacing the individual sized bottles, I felt like it was pure cost cutting (as opposed to a step in the eco-friendly direction).
When UY designations could be changed with respect to contract reacquisitions, I saw it as an opportunistic way to take back cheap contracts and turn them around for profit (as opposed to better serving the ownership waitlist).
When point minimum buy-ins changed, I thought it was an attempt to squeeze more out of people who wanted the benefits (as opposed to a step in the right direction of eliminating the studio-only, small-contract ownerships that taxes the system).
But I think given what we've seen with recent changes specific to Disney's timeshare management/development practices; lock-off-premium-leveraged reallocations, resort development where small contracts are knowingly sold against large units, increasingly less honest/adversarial sales practices, product-changing resale restrictions that only benefit Disney; there is an erosion of trust that Disney bears some responsibility for, and that has nothing to do with an aversion to change.