middlechild
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2013
That is certainly one way to view the post.It makes his Disney hates Christians narrative seem like it has weight. We all know of all people in the world White Christians are the most marginalized
Another way is to recognize that Harrison Ford brought a great deal of acting ability to make Indiana Jones his own. That merely substituting a brunette English actess while changing other parts of the casting while trying to use the same type of format to produce a 'new' Indiana Jones film protrays those that made that choice as ignoramuses. Taking that same actress and building a new story of success to augment and eventually take the place of Indiana as the archaelogy misfit would have two benefits. One, cost much less than 560M, and two, increased the audience size willing to pay to see the story. Of course 'Montana Maureen (yes, Disney, you have my permission to use the name ) would not have a ready audience like Indy Jones does, a greater risk but potentially greater reward.
I will admit many of the choices in Indy 5 were made at the start of the project five or more years ago. Would they make the same choices today? I don't believe they would, but that is in hindsight and having seen Star Wars 7 - 9 clearly demonstrate a simple substitution is a terrible strategy. TWDC has relied on the substitution method of movie-making for far too long, and audiences are tired of it, in my opinion.