Phew.....just got through about 150+ pages. Thought about skipping to the end, but about halfway through it became a pride/badge of honor thing. It was my Tour de France moment, a feat of endurance.
It wont be fair to allow people to make dining reservations if they don't have a theme park reservation secured. Ex: I booked a ressie at Cinderella's Royal Table but I haven't reserved a reservation to visit MK that day. Wooo that would be a nightmare.
I don't really think it's necessarily UNfair either.
The absolute fairest thing to do would have been limiting to x-number, and the first x-number of people who booked chronologically keep the reservations. After all, is it fair that someone who booked their dining at 180 days, minute 1 are now in the same boat as someone who booked their dining 2 weeks ago? Not really.
Then, if those 25 families or 50 people or whatever the number is, end up not getting a park reservation, then it is opened up for people with park reservations to get.
They should (when the ticket reservation system comes online) be selling tickets at a huge discount since it appears we'll be getting "half" a park with reduced hours for months. But I doubt they will .. again .. they don't want to necessarilly encourage their capacity limits to be hit.
See, I don't think this would be that hard to do. I agree with you whole-heartedly that tickets should be discounted.
And, no, you don't want it widely advertised that you are discounting tickets, for the reasons you said about capacity. But, for people who
already have resort stays booked, for people who are
already going to have park reservations anyway...offer them reduced tickets.
This is a great idea for two reasons: one, it's the right thing to do.
For two, and are you listening Bob?, those people with existing tickets that have their expirations pushed out to 2021 will say, "Hey, maybe we can save these for next year, and buy the discounted tickets now." In a sense ensuring a bounceback. Some people might be coming every year anyway. But some people may have not planned to come back for several years, but may be enticed to come back next year because they have tickets to use.
My guess? Tickets will be limited to x-amount of hours, so maybe 5, 6 hours. That would allow them to spread out the entries. So, take MK with park hours from 9-7. You could choose a 6 hour block from 9-3, 10-4, 11-5 etc...
I'm not sure what our deal breaker is, but this is probably as close to one as I can think of.
Unless they are planning on offering massive refunds on the tickets or some insanely great incentive...that would be a really stinky thing to do.
I have to make a sad confession. I actually just took screenshots of my ADRs for Oct trip that we probably won't be taking now. It was the best I've ever been able to get - restaurants and times we wanted - sadly taken away. They will serve as an Ode to the Vacation that Will Never Happen.
I did the EXACT same thing.
That is one bit of good news in all this.
Is it? Is it good news?
In my mind, the good news would be "
MNSSHP tickets discounted" No parade, no fireworks, no characters. Uhhhhhh.
Desantis stated on Outkick radio this morning that NBA players should not be in a bubble at WDW.
Well, that's a little confusing. And kind of dumb, frankly. The whole reason they came to WDW in the first place was for the bubble.
The bubble is what sold them on Disney.
oh my lanta the DRAMA.
People. It's still Disney. We're still going to be able to visit the parks, see the characters (from a far), ride the rides, and be in the atmosphere! If you don't like how Disney is going to look in July, or for the foreseeable future - DON'T GO! No one is forcing you to go.
Disney will return back to normal operations once it's safe to do so. We don't know what this virus is going to look like next week, or next month. We're just along for the ride and adapting life to be able to survive. That's what we do as humans, we adapt. And Disney is adapting their business to survive. We're even lucky that they are trying to open to the public and taking these extreme measures to keep us safe.
Yeah it burns to be have to cancel you "once in a lifetime" trip, and your children wont be as little next time you go, and maybe the princesses wont be "real" next time, but unfortunately it's what has to happen. I'm so sorry for everyone who is struggling with the process right now, but the drama surrounding "DISNEY WILL NEVER BE THE SAME" is ludicrous.
Gotta love the vintage DJ Tanner.
The second point is something we are struggling with, real bad. The kids are 5 and 2, so they are at the perfect age for the magic, for the characters, for the fantasy.
Sure, we could defer till next year, but there's no guarantee that some of that stuff will be back by then. And, it will be doubly crowded.
And yes, Disney will always be there. But, in 5 years, some family members may or may not be with us any longer, and the kids won't necessarily be in that sweet spot where they are in awe of the characters.
I asked me 2 year old niece last night where she wanted to go. "Disney World." Then I asked her what she wanted to do most at Disney World. "Meet Minnie Mouse"
As for my guesses on closed rides (aside from shows):
Soarin (agree that pre show loading will be hard and once the ride starts moving through the cloud that others were sitting in previously)
Flight of Passage (again pre show loading rooms and each “motorcycle” would have to be cleaned)
MFSR
Buzz
Magic Carpets and Dumbo (the handles and scarabs to make the ride vehicles rise and fall - too touchy)
Mission Space (too close together)
Its going to be rough.
That would be pretty terrible.
That said, I think offering/requiring disposable gloves is definitely an option at the touchy touchy rides, like Buzz, Midway Mania, SR, things like that. Yes, it may add a minute or two to the process. But, I don't think it's completely out of the question.
Flight of Passage would be a gut punch.
looks like there will not be. However, I wonder if they open some character dining restaurants without the characters. Tusker House for instance could easily still make money without characters. Boma, with a similar menu as Tusker House, makes plenty of money with no characters.
Tusker House is a GREAT restaurant. And it would be a great restaurant with or without characters. But, my question at that point is....is it really worth it to pay the same amount or higher for a meal without the characters? After all, the premium is FOR the characters. Is it really *fair* for Disney to charge the same or more for a lesser meal?
So....are they going to lower the prices to make it a more non-character price point? Go ahead, laugh, I'll wait.
Still waiting.....
Out of your system now? Good.
I honestly feel the REAL reason of them having shorter hours is to limit staff shifts (save money) under the guise of safety measures
I think you're right. Which stinks.