dsnymnkyuncle
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2020
IMO hair splitting. Hiring people getting paid by CNN and taking pay from a campaign at the same speaks for itself. I see no difference in the accuracy of those people and the evident bias from the example you posted.I'll deal with these one at a time. Most often CNN has oppositional folks on their shows. This is evident to the audience, and their position is well known. It's not hidden. If they tell a lie they can be called out on it immediately. I don't mind opinions, which can be the same thing as complex analysis. I do think it is best to give different opinions an airing out and allow them to give their best arguments.
A simple Google search shows Anderson Cooper 360 had many times excoriated Trump for birtherism and many other things.
Yet Cooper is a lead liar in numbers of lies and misrepresentations if not quality and consistency. Nobody calls him out on it. Excoriating Trump after the election or outside Trump's presence just underlines my point about Cooper kissing up to Trump prior to the elections when questions on a sarah palin level would have derailed him.
What is the name of the person investigating in HI?
How much are you paying? When is the report in?
In response to the (to this day) never ending....that's what people tell me.....everyone says. "WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE PERSON WHO TOLD YOU". Sarah palin level. Yet all cooper did was stand and nod.