maybe just to frame it differently, because there's just an inherent disagreement on the benefits of staying at a resort like SSR or OKW which arent park adjacent (and also have more of a TS feel)...
the pro here of owning DVC is probably buying into a "Disney" property with all of the sentimental and tangible benefits of staying on disney property, but that you might take the pressure off of the need to be in the parks constantly as many do when they are doing the value/moderate rat race (and for which the hotel/ticket packages often are linked to having a park ticket for every day of the stay). this is a pro that only applies to people who actually were staying in those value/mod resorts, but does not apply to people who were fine staying at the sheraton or marriot or wherever (of which there are plenty).
Its plenty articulated in these boards, but the value in DVC is always closely tied to what you place value on and what type of travel you're turning away from in order to travel via DVC. For some people, that value is going to be different and for some it will just mean DVC isn't worth it. At least in my experience, i always thought this was one of the few "sales pitches" that the guides were pretty honest on too (at least to me). The math works if you're comparing disney on property to disney on property, or comparing studio/hotel room accomodations to bigger accommodations. The math stops working if you're a traveler that's totally fine in a property adjacent hotel room.