Honestly kind of surprised to see they are blocking certain specific domains instead of everything that isn’t pre-approved…but now that I think about it, it kind of makes sense or it would be impossible to share anything that wasn’t on a sponsor’s site.
It’ll be interesting to see if it gets added to the filter after the leadership change/resignation a few months ago.
I wasn’t talking about a sponsor?
PSA: It's true that filtered sites are being reviewed. I do not know the status of the review, other than a few sites have been removed from the filter. As Sandi said, we Mods are not part of the review process, although very occasionally, Chuck & I have been asked for our opinions. AFAIK, almost all of the sites in the filter are there for good reasons.
Shhhhhhhhhhhh
It was me and I’m pretty sure someone previously suggested it was why only a few resale sites/services could be mentioned— happy to be corrected and I’ll know better going forward.
Hmm at first glance that doesn’t look right, I’ll take a closer look when I get back to my computer to see what happened. Btw you can see the exact amount with the disname lookup tool
I forgot, the normalizing formula only gives half credit to points with less than 11 months to expiration. I've been rethinking the formula now that I have a better understanding of what happens to values at the end of the year. I'll recalculate the normalized value for all the contracts once I'm satisfied I have a formula that provides a better/fairer comparison.
@Galactic Reversal posted on another thread that he’s been very busy with non-DVC life lately. I suspect something broke in the data feed.
Thanks for the update I must have missed that.
