godisney14
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2019
No I read that post
None of this changes my comment no? regarding us not knowing if this is all working? I don't know personally speaking if it's a logical step or not truly because we've never been in this situation. I'm cautiously optimistic though
In many respects the numbers are not going to give a full picture as selective testing and lack of abundance testing is skewing numbers. And the numbers will continue to be skewed as selective testing continues. If the incubation period was much shorter and tests much faster in response (which I know they are working on it) we would be in a better picture to know if any given measure has really worked. So far it's been a rapid progression without enough time to fully investigate how any measures are effectively working here in the U.S. (note in the U.S.).
Sometimes you just have to take a step towards what seems most logical before coming to a consensus. Inaction is what got us to where we are at right now. And, for now, we are doing what’s needed just not enough. Plenty of evidence out there. If you can’t see that, not sure what else to say at this point besides you can help by staying home.