Yes, please do look into it, QUITE extensively. Now, DISCLAIMER - I know Wikipedia is not a good source for "looking things up" - but this is a
well-written article, and has links to literally hundreds of resources and medical articles to prove that NAET is, at best, ineffective.
I, personally, would never risk the health of someone, especially a child, who had been diagnosed with something like celiac, if
"The few available reviews in the literature that discuss NAET directly, state that it lacks any supporting evidence and that its claims are unsubstantiated. The theoretical basis of NAET has been criticized for lacking scientific rationale and the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy advise against the use of NAET."
In a critical appraisal of Nambudripad's techniques Stephen Barrett of Quackwatch writes:
"NAET clashes with the concepts of anatomy, physiology, pathology, physics, and allergy accepted by the scientific community. The story of its "discovery" is highly implausible. Its core diagnostic approach muscle testing for "allergies" is senseless and is virtually certain to diagnose nonexistent problems. Its recommendations for dietary restrictions based on nonexistent food allergies are likely to place the patient at great risk for nutrient deficiency, and, in the case of children, at risk for social problems and the development of eating disorders."
To each their own, but I want something that hs been
proven to keep my loved ones safe.
