I get your point, but you are talking about the people who literally spent hours straight sitting on these boards jumping on people with an opposing view of their for things like word choice, and missing letters at the ends of words, and whether or not they accurately quoted someone else, all trying to discount the validity of their opinion about FP+ due to these factors.
Yet, we have a video discussing the issue from people who, as many people recognize, are in the "know" about many a topic regarding Disney world. Both from their experiences in the parks, their contacts in the parks/corporation, and their experience with a vast array of clients and wdw guests. And suddenly those people don't have an interest or the "time" to watch the video?
And the video does offer "new" information, in that information we have debated, back and forth from our own perspective, are commented on not only from the panel's personal experiences, but the things they hear from their clients. Arguably these folks' experiences (on particular issues ie: SB wait times) and the things they have heard from clients (a much larger pool of experiences than any of us have access to) should be more valuable than anyone's personal experiences here on the boards, and should be valued for their ability to comment on the overall or aggregate effects of FP+.