I completely agree with 'all of the above' -
In large corporations it's not unusual for one department or business unit to 'pay' for the services of another - it may be 'funny money' that never really changes hands, but in most businesses, you have to justify your existence. So (for example) the copy center had to show how much they save the company in estimated money 'what do we change the company internally vs. the cost at Kinkos?' and productivity (again, it's a guess) 'how much time did it save running down the hall instead of a 45 minute trip to bind the presentation?'
For a lot of these kind of things, the best answer you ever get is a wild guess.
So for VMK, does ToonTown pay funny-money to VMK for ad space on the home page?
I don't know, but they must believe there is a benefit to placing it there. Same for Pirates.
Marketing could do a lot more to justify the existence of VMK. Tens of thousands of us see the home page each week, and the themed months take the advertising a step further.
Did anyone NOT see the POTC movies when pirate month came up?
The reality that they seem to be missing, is that we all have different reasons for loving VMK.
Those reasons will not translate to Pirates or Cars or Fairies on-line. I'm sure my kids may have fun on those sights from time to time, but they will never replace VMK, and to the marketing folks, they will never build the same branding and mind share with my family that VMK does.
My kids will not tell me they miss
Disneyland (and they do, several times a month) because of Pirates or ToonTown. I guess that could save me a ton of cash, having purchased five sets of annual passes for a growing family (head count is up to seven) in the last eight years.
My sons will not play Fairies. My girls are not likely to race their brothers on Cars on-line or help re-take the Pearl on pirates. Mom and I will not have time to help them on several different services.
VMK has been a place where my entire family plays together (we take turns on 4 PCs, connected to DSL through a wireless hub). That won't happen on the new offerings. The new offerings would take us on 'new paths' that reduce the amount of time we spend doing things as a family.
Because of that, I cannot see myself ever paying for an account on any of them.
If the Disney on-line folks are planning on a strategy of having us 'move on' to the new offerings, they need to do more thinking.
Closing VMK will be remembered by my kids as one of the biggest disappointments of their youth, and it will be at the hands of Disney. If we have to find new things to do as a family, the 'moving on' will be to playing board games or going on bike rides, and vacations will lean toward the beach and Six Flags theme parks, because Disney will have lost its Magic.
I guess I need to write to them to make sure they know this.