- Joined
- Apr 29, 2004
That's a different point than the original statement.I was trying to say that Disney definitely keeps kids in mind.
Disney is not geared towards adults.
That's a different point than the original statement.I was trying to say that Disney definitely keeps kids in mind.
Disney is not geared towards adults.
Did I by any chance offend you? Or any other adult cruisers? ... I was trying to say that Disney definitely keeps kids in mind. I feel like is a cruise line is perfect for kids. It good for adults and maybe one of the best for adults. Adults can have fun to but maybe it just go in my head adults hate the characters but they can have fun with them to. Maybe it's that word Disney, I'm not sure. I'm actually pretty confused why I said that considering there are many memebers on this site that go on atleast one cruise per year with families or solo. Sorry if I offended you in any way.
No, I believe Disney should stay Disney. It would be too big of a transition. Disney is not geared towards adults. Kids would be bored out of their mind on a river cruise. River cruises are geared towards adults, Disney is geared towards kids. Now this is just my opinion, looking forward to see what others have to say!
...It good for adults and maybe one of the best for adults. ...
That's a different point than the original statement.
Yes it is. That's what I was saying after I thought about it and did about an hours worth of research. I looked at Carnival and RCCL and say Disney has the same, if not more of adult only things. Disney service has both of those lines beat. Now, of course you can't judge a cruise line on adult only places because there is other things to do. I was just trying to say what I though after I did research.But, what you said was:
That's different than:
Did I by any chance offend you? Or any other adult cruisers? Although your answer "As would this one. As would my parents. As would mnay other adults I know. " I was trying to say that Disney definitely keeps kids in mind. I feel like is a cruise line is perfect for kids. It good for adults and maybe one of the best for adults. Adults can have fun to but maybe it just go in my head adults hate the characters but they can have fun with them to. Maybe it's that word Disney, I'm not sure. I'm actually pretty confused why I said that considering there are many memebers on this site that go on atleast one cruise per year with families or solo. Sorry if I offended you in any way.
Well, maybe, if you don't know, research first before posting.Yes it is. That's what I was saying after I thought about it and did about an hours worth of research. I looked at Carnival and RCCL and say Disney has the same, if not more of adult only things. Disney service has both of those lines beat. Now, of course you can't judge a cruise line on adult only places because there is other things to do. I was just trying to say what I though after I did research.
Very, very true.Not offended, but Disney is in no way, shape, or form only for kids.
Sorry for causing trouble. I'll make sure to do my researchWell, maybe, if you don't know, research first before posting.
You'll find that, on occasion, people will only read the early posts on a thread, skipping later ones that might correct an opinion. It's best to be clear in your opinions before posting.
No, I believe Disney should stay Disney. It would be too big of a transition. Disney is not geared towards adults. Kids would be bored out of their mind on a river cruise. River cruises are geared towards adults, Disney is geared towards kids. Now this is just my opinion, looking forward to see what others have to say!
The economics of river cruises are quite different, because of the ship build, registry andstaff. That is part of why river cruises are so expensive.
I'm a St. Louis native. I guess I find this idea sort of intriguing, confusing, and a bit unlikely all at once. River cruises are about cruising past scenic locales. I think people are in for a bit of a shock when they float past barges and see all the rather industrial shoreside "scenery" in the St. Louis area. I'm not sure chemical companies, etc, are what people have in mind for their view. Maybe upriver or downriver, there is nicer scenery. On the other hand, people who miss casinos on Disney cruises could hop onto a casino boat when their cruise is in port.
No, I believe Disney should stay Disney. It would be too big of a transition. Disney is not geared towards adults. Kids would be bored out of their mind on a river cruise. River cruises are geared towards adults, Disney is geared towards kids. Now this is just my opinion, looking forward to see what others have to say!
My answer to the original question as to whether Disney should enter the Mississippi River market is sure, why not.I have to disagree. Disney already does river cruises in Europe. Granted the river ships are not Disney themed but they are definitely geared to adults (and kids).
I am going on one in June with Adventures By Disney from Budapest to Munich with stops in Slovakia and Austria. I can't wait!!! The ship doing the Danube River cruise is called the AmaViola. Here is a link.
https://www.adventuresbydisney.com/europe/danube-river-cruise/
I could see them doing something like OP suggested. I think it would be a great idea!!!
MJ
Definitely not looking for an argument here. I'm not familiar with industry along the cruise routes for European river cruises. I'm only saying that the St. Louis area waterfront isn't that scenic, aside from the (really rather small) downtown area waterfront. There are certainly things to do there for a day; I'm only talking about the cruise to/from the area being less-than-desirable from a native's perspective.You think there's no industry along Europe's main waterways?
This is the American Queen. She's the biggest out there on American Rivers
She hold 436 passengers and 160 crew. She's a sternwheeler. She is 418ft. long Like I said, I think a Disney boat should be a side wheeler so as the use the stern for a pool area. I think a Disney boat should go for 500 to 550 with a crew of about 190 to 200. It all depends on just how many locks they'd want to get through. It's not an issue on the Lower Ms. from St. Louis down to New Orleans. I've seen huge barges 6 wide and well over 500 ft. long on the Lower MS.