Now, this confuses me to a degree. ECIGS emit water vapor. If an ECIG could trigger a smoke alarm? So would other Water Vapor sources - showers, boiling water from a coffee pot .... all of which emit far MORE Water Vapor. So... given the emission mechanism of an ECIG, it sounds, on the surface, as though people should really WATCH OUT for the consequences of taking a Hot Shower in these rooms, with the bathroom door open
.
Might there be particulates in the Water Vapor? Totally possible. Same is true of brewing coffee (one can "smell" it - quick, how does that work?). Also true of any aerosol (like lysol spray) that one can smell. I would worry about brewing coffee or using disinfectants in any of these rooms
.
You see, smoke detectors are optimized to detect combustion particulates - for a reason. If they were not built this way? Every house in the US would get rid of them, as a nuisance
. One COULD design a "smoke detector" that would react to ANY airborne particulate.... including atomized perfume - or a human passing gas
. But I don't think something like that would see a huge sales volume
. In WDWs case - the concern is room degradation (lingering smell), or damage (fire), from a resident smoking classic materials. Totally reasonable.
So - if WDW has installed "smoke detectors" capable of detecting airborne water vapor particulates? Wellllllll - that's going to trigger a LOT of alarms. Their choice
.
All personal opinion - I'm not right, you aren't wrong, not choosing to reply to quotes....