Interesting way to look at that! I always see it as an opportunity to keep those characters lives going and dig deeper into the story but I can see your point!I'm not too big on sequels for many because they occasionally ruin the 'Happily Ever After" feel of the original proving that it wasn't "Happily Ever After' after all.
Tangled and Princess And The Frog are two of my favorites of the "newer" princess movies. They are both done really nicely and they deserve sequels (and I'm not talking about the Tangled: Before Ever After TV movie, I mean a real sequel).
It's a full movie though isn't it? So technically it's a sequel. I started it one time but the bad animation style was hard to watch, especially for a whole movie that I ended it. I do want to pick it up sometime and give the show a chance bc I really love Tangled, but I wish they had made the animation smoother. It's soo bright that it vibrates the eye and I can't imagine watching it for like 90 min lol.Before Ever After was just the pilot of rhte series, which was a sprawling epic of a sequel. IT's really very good and worth watching.
It's a full movie though isn't it? So technically it's a sequel. I started it one time but the bad animation style was hard to watch, especially for a whole movie that I ended it. I do want to pick it up sometime and give the show a chance bc I really love Tangled, but I wish they had made the animation smoother. It's soo bright that it vibrates the eye and I can't imagine watching it for like 90 min lol.
Oh so it's not really a movie?Well, it's really like the first three episodes of the series stitched into a movie. They can show them seperately or as a whole. I liked the animation style and all three seasons of the show.
Oh so it's not really a movie?
I agree if you mean the 1992 versionAladdin; so many questions I need answers to! Does someone find the lamp with Jafar in it? Do Aladdin and Jasmine have kids? What happens with Abu? What choices does the Genie make with his newfound freedom? Help me out Disney...
1992 is the only version that exists in my worldI agree if you mean the 1992 version
1992 is the only version that exists in my world
Agreed. Let them live "Happily Ever after" without anymore contrived BS.None. 99% of the time sequels are terrible because the story and the character arc is over and came to a good conclusion.
It usually ruins the character to force it into a story where it doesn't belong.
Rarily does Disney pulls it off, I do not trust them with more