Sassagoula Billy
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2010
Don't I have anything positive to contribute?
NO!
BLAH to Snow White's Mine Train Coaster Wonderland.
NO!
BLAH to Snow White's Mine Train Coaster Wonderland.
There really is no way to tell for sure at this point,but,to me,it "looks" like it will be somewhere "between" Barnstormer and Big Thunder Mountain Railroad.Is the Snow Whoite coaster a kiddie coaster - like Barnstormer -or a big one?
I "think" it is just going to be called Storybook Circus.So, in Circus Land (is that an official name?):
On the right, we have Goofini and Dumbo
In the center: water play area and train station.
What's on the left, where those three tents are?
I'm guessing that the mine train will be a full-scale roller coaster, i.e., with the same height restriction as BTMRR. I know it is Fantasyland, and all, but remember that Matterhorn Bobsleds is in Fantasyland at Disneyland.
I agree to some extent. However, I wouldn't call it a "loss" - rather it is at worst a "missed opportunity for younger children". The reason why I say that is that it isn't replacing that much that younger children were able to gain much enjoyment from in the past. Pretty-much everything that is currently in the place where the mine train is going is either being moved, replaced by similar, comparably-enjoyable entertainment for younger children elsewhere, or little-used in the first place. I think that's an important distinction, because I do believe that making Fantasyland more attractive to older children and adults has benefits overall.From my own perspective, I hope that's the case. But it would be a HUGE loss to the younger kids visiting the Magic Kingdom.
I disagree with the context. There is more to do at Disney's parks in Florida, for every age group, than there is at Disney's parks in California. The way the attractions are grouped together (these things in Disneyland, those things in Magic Kingdom, other things at Animal Kingdom, still other things at California Adventure, etc.) doesn't matter that much, when looking back at your entire vacation experience.Remember, Fantasyland at DL has TONS more for the little kids to do, and that is definitely NOT the case in the Magic Kingdom.
I agree to some extent. However, I wouldn't call it a "loss" - rather it is at worst a "missed opportunity for younger children". The reason why I say that is that it isn't replacing that much that younger children were able to gain much enjoyment from in the past. Pretty-much everything that is currently in the place where the mine train is going is either being moved, replaced by similar, comparably-enjoyable entertainment for younger children elsewhere, or little-used in the first place. I think that's an important distinction, because I do believe that making Fantasyland more attractive to older children and adults has benefits overall.
I disagree with the context. There is more to do at Disney's parks in Florida, for every age group, than there is at Disney's parks in California. The way the attractions are grouped together (these things in Disneyland, those things in Magic Kingdom, other things at Animal Kingdom, still other things at California Adventure, etc.) doesn't matter that much, when looking back at your entire vacation experience.
And am I the only one who finds it odd to have 2 runaway mine coasters in the MK?
Yes, but what I'm saying is that it works both ways: The lack of interest in Fantasyland among teens, for example, drives families with both a couple of teens and a young child to spend less time in Fantasyland than if there were more natural opportunities to split up so the kids can each enjoy age-appropriate attractions, but stay nearby each other.Well, I still think it matters greatly to the youngest visitors.
That's no different than being unable to spend two days in Disneyland instead of spending one day in Disneyland.And remember.... not everyone can afford to spend an entire week at Disney and visit all 4 parks.
We can agree to disagree about that.And honestly..... DHS and Epcot have VERY little for the tiny ones to do.
Or, rather, they simply have a broader definition, than you, of what their target market is.I think a fast intense ride like the Matterhorn would be AWESOME. I'm just saying I think the Disney marketing folks have missed their target market if that's the case.
No more so than having two Dumbo rides. Indeed, I see this mine train being a way of recognizing that they need to do something about the long queue times at BTMRR.And am I the only one who finds it odd to have 2 runaway mine coasters in the MK?