maxiesmom
The Mean Squinty Eye Works
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2004
You know, if everyone could just use a little bit of common sense instead of arguing about every word someone uses this dicussion would not be necessary. There IS an expectation of privacy in the restroom. Many legal cases have established that so it is fact. I can expect NOT to be on display to members of the opposite sex while there. Common sense would dictate that a small child who is not yet aware of the differences in male and female and the connotations that those differences carry would not be a violation of that privacy while and older child who is very well aware of and curious of those differences certianly would. We all know that this point comes for the vast majority of children about the time they enter elemantary school. We know that at this point they should be toileting on thier own and capable of going into the appropiate restroom to do so. It is the irrational fear of the boogey man and nothing more that leads us to force them into a place they should never be. Why not just let go of that irrational fear and allow kids to do what we all know by rights they should be doing?
Because some parents fail to let their commons sense dictate what they do, and instead give in to that fear.
As far as the photo taking creap goes, how would you(in general) prevent them from taking pictures of your child if you were in one stall, and the child in another? There is no way your son is any safer in the womens restroom than the mens unless you have them with you all of the time. That pervert proves the point unless your child is in the stall with you bad things can still happen. Just taking your child into the general restroom area with you, and then going into seperate stalls, helps nothing.