There's absolutely no anger from me. It's just disappointing when you reply the way you did. "Gosh I'm sorry you were confused," followed by telling me it was self-explanatory (obvious implication that you're foolish if you're confused by something so simple it was self-explanatory). Meanwhile you didn't even address my actual point of confusion (being why cite individual events as proof when they can be readily countered by opposite events).
You just wanted to mock me because you didn't agree and I took issue with something Pete said. The oozing condescension of your reply makes that perfectly clear. You don't have to directly attack someone to be doing it nonetheless, and you know exactly why you phrased your response the way you did.
Again, I'm not angry, and I have no interest in continuing to argue, so I'll stop with this post. Just disappointing a moderator here feels the need to talk down to anyone for no reason.