They posted where everyone works, not just the Disney employee.I still never really understand why they include information about the fact that 1 of the people arrested in a sting like this is a Disney employee! It has absolutely nothing to do with the case itself nor was any part of the sting or other events related to it ever I'm just a property. Seems like the news media just puts the word Disney into articles like this to get people to read the story. I'm very surprised that Disney lawyers don't put cease-and-desist orders against the media republishing things like this. You never see them publish any other corporation as where the perpetrators are employees.
I still never really understand why they include information about the fact that 1 of the people arrested in a sting like this is a Disney employee! It has absolutely nothing to do with the case itself nor was any part of the sting or other events related to it ever I'm just a property. Seems like the news media just puts the word Disney into articles like this to get people to read the story. I'm very surprised that Disney lawyers don't put cease-and-desist orders against the media republishing things like this. You never see them publish any other corporation as where the perpetrators are employees.
Target isn't a kid-focused business. It's like when an educator is charged of the same. It's worse when it's those who have easy daily access to kids. Pretty simple really.I agree with the pp it's like they put that the person was a Disney employee to make Disney look back or grab attention. When these men are caught and they are a Target employee that's never in the headline.
Target isn't a kid-focused business. It's like when an educator is charged of the same. It's worse when it's those who have easy daily access to kids. Pretty simple really.
My quote button isn't working but to the above poster ^^ there are just are plenty of kids in Walmart or Target too so that thought process doesn't work for me.
And I am sure Disney is OFTEN used in headlines to draw readers when it may not really relate at all.I agree with the pp it's like they put that the person was a Disney employee to make Disney look back or grab attention. When these men are caught and they are a Target employee that's never in the headline.
I still never really understand why they include information about the fact that 1 of the people arrested in a sting like this is a Disney employee! It has absolutely nothing to do with the case itself nor was any part of the sting or other events related to it ever I'm just a property. Seems like the news media just puts the word Disney into articles like this to get people to read the story. I'm very surprised that Disney lawyers don't put cease-and-desist orders against the media republishing things like this. You never see them publish any other corporation as where the perpetrators are employees.
If you can’t see the difference, I don’t know how to help you with that.My quote button isn't working but to the above poster ^^ there are just are plenty of kids in Walmart or Target too so that thought process doesn't work for me.
To be fair, you seemed a bit salty in your response first. Basically, you can pretty much equate Disney employee to Day Care worker when it comes to a headline like this. Disney is geared towards children, Target is not.Wow..Just because someone has a different opinion than you doesn't mean you need to be salty in your opinions.
To me it's just about grabbing attention and sensationalism in our news reporting..But that's okay for us to defer in opinions - I'm cool with that...Checking out of this conversation.
I wasn’t being salty. I merely think you do see the difference here. I don’t know if Disney employees require a vulnerable sector check, but they should. Target not so much.Wow..Just because someone has a different opinion than you doesn't mean you need to be salty in your opinions.
To me it's just about grabbing attention and sensationalism in our news reporting..But that's okay for us to defer in opinions - I'm cool with that...Checking out of this conversation.