KappaSigHero
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
This is the sequence of events from the end of the meeting, quoted directly from the father's blog. I've bolded to emphasize points I'll post below.
"Near the end of the meeting, the Cruise Director asked me what they could do to make it up to us. I told him I didnt have a specific remedy in mind, but something needed to be done, especially for my wife since this cruise had been booked to celebrate her birthday. What happened essentially ruined her birthday and spoiled the entire trip for her.
I mentioned that we had a dinner reservation for her birthday, and I thought to myself that maybe the Cruise Director or the Captain might come by to wish her a happy birthday and apologize to her in person. At least to show that they do value their customers and that truly cared for what had happened to us.
Later, I spoke with my wife and we agreed that the best outcome would be not having to pay for a vacation that was ruined. So I sent a note to the Cruise Director and then headed to the restaurant.
Dinner was alright, considering we were hardly in a mood to celebrate after what had happened. Disappointingly, no one came by to apologize or offer birthday wishes.
When we returned to the room that night, there was a printed note from the Cruise Director saying someone from their corporate office will contact us after the trip."
So after the meeting with the cruise director, the events occurred in this order:
-Father states to CD that something needed to be done, especially for his wife.
-Father mentions the Palo reservation for his wife's birthday, and thinks to himself that it would be nice for an apology to be made during dinner.
-Father speaks with wife, they agree that the best outcome would be a refund, and notify the CD in writing.
-After dinner, the couple finds a note from the CD that this would be handled by the corporate office.
The reason I outlined this is to clear a few misconceptions I've seen repeated by those on both sides of the argument. Using only the information provided by the father, it is clear (and not an assumption or inference) that.
-The father did mention his wife's birthday and dinner reservations, but did not directly request a visit by the captain or CD.
-The request for a refund was not due to the captain or CD not appearing at dinner, as the request was made prior to dinner.
So I don't hold the CD or captain at fault for not reading the father's mind, nor do I follow the line of thinking that has been repeated by some skeptics that the father only requested the refund because of the dinner absence.
"Near the end of the meeting, the Cruise Director asked me what they could do to make it up to us. I told him I didnt have a specific remedy in mind, but something needed to be done, especially for my wife since this cruise had been booked to celebrate her birthday. What happened essentially ruined her birthday and spoiled the entire trip for her.
I mentioned that we had a dinner reservation for her birthday, and I thought to myself that maybe the Cruise Director or the Captain might come by to wish her a happy birthday and apologize to her in person. At least to show that they do value their customers and that truly cared for what had happened to us.
Later, I spoke with my wife and we agreed that the best outcome would be not having to pay for a vacation that was ruined. So I sent a note to the Cruise Director and then headed to the restaurant.
Dinner was alright, considering we were hardly in a mood to celebrate after what had happened. Disappointingly, no one came by to apologize or offer birthday wishes.
When we returned to the room that night, there was a printed note from the Cruise Director saying someone from their corporate office will contact us after the trip."
So after the meeting with the cruise director, the events occurred in this order:
-Father states to CD that something needed to be done, especially for his wife.
-Father mentions the Palo reservation for his wife's birthday, and thinks to himself that it would be nice for an apology to be made during dinner.
-Father speaks with wife, they agree that the best outcome would be a refund, and notify the CD in writing.
-After dinner, the couple finds a note from the CD that this would be handled by the corporate office.
The reason I outlined this is to clear a few misconceptions I've seen repeated by those on both sides of the argument. Using only the information provided by the father, it is clear (and not an assumption or inference) that.
-The father did mention his wife's birthday and dinner reservations, but did not directly request a visit by the captain or CD.
-The request for a refund was not due to the captain or CD not appearing at dinner, as the request was made prior to dinner.
So I don't hold the CD or captain at fault for not reading the father's mind, nor do I follow the line of thinking that has been repeated by some skeptics that the father only requested the refund because of the dinner absence.