DIS Shareholders and Stock Info ONLY

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/marvel-exec-explains-shift-away-002403011.html

Marvel Exec Explains Shift Away From Creating ‘as Much as We Could for Disney+, as Quickly as We Could’
by Stephanie Kaloi
Sat, March 16, 2024 at 7:24 PM CDT


The 2019 launch of streaming platform Disney+ changed a lot for Marvel Studios, though those developments may not have been immediately obvious to fans. Marvel’s head of streaming, television and animation Brad Winderbaum said in an interview with the “Phase Zero” podcast, “Frankly, in all honesty, there was a mandate to kind of create as much as we could for Disney+, as quickly as we could.”

“And then there was a shift,” Winderbaum continued. “And all of a sudden, we have to start spreading our release dates out. So, that really accounts for a lot of the delays. Now, we’re using that time. We’re not sitting idle.

“So, it’s like it stays in the oven. You can bake certain things a little more. It’s actually, I think, ultimately, it’s only going to make things better. But, most of it is just frankly shrapnel from the business.”


Yes, even Marvel isn’t immune from changes in the overall entertainment industry. Part of this change is that the studio is actively developing more projects than it will likely actually produce, which is how Hollywood traditionally has worked but hasn’t been the approach at Marvel.

“We’re more like a traditional studio now. We’re developing more than we actually will produce,” Winderbaum continued. He then agreed with the interviewer’s enthusiasm about Marvel’s hero Nova: “There are plans to develop Nova. I love Nova, too. I love Rich Rider, too. I hope it gets to the screen.”

“The world is always chaos,” Winderbaum added. “There’s always things. You’ve got to conjure these things to make them happen, but I would love to see a Nova show, one day.”

Winderbaum spoke about the unexpected departure of “X-Men ’97” showrunner Beau DeMayo from the series both with “Phase Zero” and in a Friday interview with Entertainment Weekly. He told EW, “I can’t talk about the details, but I can say that Beau had real respect and passion for these characters and wrote what I think are excellent scripts that really the rest of the team were able to draw inspiration from [to] build this amazing show that’s on screen.”

DeMayo’s exit from the series came after he completed work on season 1 and had begun work on season 2, including writing scripts for the whole season. Ahead of his dismissal, DeMayo’s social media accounts were taken offline and he was removed from planned press conferences.

You can watch the full “Phase Zero” interview with Marvel’s Brad Winderbaum at the top of this story.

The post Marvel Exec Explains Shift Away From Creating ‘as Much as We Could for Disney+, as Quickly as We Could’ appeared first on TheWrap.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...t-isn-t-nelson-peltz-s-only-drama/ar-BB1k2Wrn

A Big Disney Fight Isn’t Nelson Peltz’s Only Drama
The billionaire is in the hot seat after an investor exodus and employee tensions rattled his hedge fund

By Cara Lombardo and Lauren Thomas
March 17, 2024 - 10:23 am EDT

Nelson Peltz’s hedge fund had a problem. A few years ago, investors in Trian Partners were yanking hundreds of millions of dollars after its performance had soured.

Around the same time, Peltz’s son, Matt, and others at the firm were eyeing a big bet on one of the most high-profile targets imaginable, Disney. They had watched the media giant’s stock plummet as it poured billions into its new streaming service.

Nelson, who had become a billionaire investing in household names like Pepsi, saw a chance to use his firm’s operational know-how to turn around a struggling business. A big splash could also attract new investors. Peltz’s neighbor and friend, former Marvel Entertainment Chairman Isaac “Ike” Perlmutter, was one of Disney’s largest individual shareholders, and later threw his support behind the effort.

The firm is now waging what’s expected to be the costliest proxy fight ever for two seats on Disney’s board. But while arguing it can help Disney “restore the magic,” Trian has quietly been grappling with its own upheaval.

Trian’s assets under management dropped following a bruising stretch that included a painful bet on General Electric. Ed Garden, Nelson’s 62-year-old son-in-law and a co-founder of Trian, unexpectedly departed and is not speaking to Nelson after a power struggle within the firm that many expected he would one day lead. Matt Peltz’s ascent zapped morale among employees, prompting some to leave.

With two of Nelson’s sons now involved, some employees resent what they see as preferential treatment. Besides Matt, who joined Trian in 2008, another son, Diesel, joined more recently. He had previously launched a mobile app that aimed to cure FOMO by helping friends meet up in real life. Another son, Brad, is a former professional hockey player who now works with a franchisee of Wendy’s, a longtime Trian investment.

rian is spending an estimated $25 million on the Disney effort.

A victory could lend credibility to the newest iteration of Trian after a rocky run. A loss could raise the question of whether Trian is nearing the end of its ride as one of the most feared activist hedge funds.

This account is based on conversations with roughly two dozen people familiar with the dynamics in the firm and familiar with its key figures.

‘Persistence’

Peltz, whose low, booming voice commands a room, for decades has been one of Wall Street’s chief rabble-rousers, buying up big chunks of companies’ stock and demanding a say in their business plans to make them more profitable.

He is quick to correct anyone who lumps him in with activist investors like Carl Icahn—he instead brands himself a “constructivist” who works alongside CEOs and boards. Yet several of his firm’s campaigns have ballooned into some of the most memorable corporate clashes in history.

One of his personal 10 commandments, according to a book of quotes his family made for a recent birthday, is: “Just make a pain in the *** of yourself. They don’t teach persistence in business school.”

Peltz was raised in a middle-class family in Brooklyn. He delights in recounting how he dropped out of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School to become a ski instructor. He soon needed more cash, so picked up a few shifts at his father’s food-distribution business with the goal of returning to the slopes, he said on fellow billionaire David Rubenstein’s Bloomberg TV show in 2022. After finding he couldn’t help but point out a few missed opportunities in his father’s operation, he stuck around to fix the issues himself.

He sold that business, then built a packaging-and-container empire with help from junk-bond king Michael Milken and sold that. He personally made over $500 million on the latter sale. He and business partner Peter May notched another big payday years later when they bought and sold the Snapple beverage business.

He and May formed Trian in 2005 with Garden, who by then was married to Peltz’s daughter.

One of Trian’s first big splashes was an investment in Heinz, which it urged to pare some costs while increasing marketing spending. (The firm had tried to get a board seat for the former pro golfer Greg Norman, a friend of Peltz’s, but was unsuccessful.) Heinz was later sold to a group that included Warren Buffett.

Trian often highlights how many companies that initially resisted its involvement later embraced it. After failing to get on the board of chemical company DuPont, the firm got kudos for helping it orchestrate its merger with Dow.

When Peltz ran to join the board of Procter & Gamble in 2017, a contentious shareholder vote ended with the company winning by a thin margin. P&G gave him a board seat anyway. He quickly helped dismantle its jumbled management structure, a pet peeve of his. By the time he stepped down in 2021, P&G’s stock had risen 58%.

Peltz encourages Trian employees to solve thorny issues through what he calls “respectful confrontation.” Coffee mugs in Trian’s offices say “Sales up, expenses down” on one side and “Cash is king” on the other. He sits in meetings with his elbows on the table and fingers interlaced, often looking eager to interject his thoughts.

His specialty is in advising companies with recognizable brands. He sees himself as a savant of changing consumer tastes, a skill he’s quipped comes from being a father of 10 children who span several generations.

He boasted to friends when one daughter, the model and actress Nicola Peltz, began dating the eldest son of soccer star David Beckham and former Spice Girl Victoria Beckham. The pair married in 2022 on the Peltzes’ Palm Beach estate, where guests included Milken and Serena Williams.

He recently helped fund a movie Nicola wrote and starred in, in which she played a poor teenager trying to save money to help her brother. One of his sons, Will, is an actor and model who has walked the runway for Dolce & Gabbana. His youngest are twins in their early 20s.

He makes no effort to avoid flaunting his fortune. The diamond ring he bought his wife “covers the whole space between the base of the finger and the knuckle,” a friend told The Wall Street Journal in 1988. Years ago, he famously tussled with neighbors near his Bedford, N.Y., estate over the noise from his helicopter commute to Manhattan. He is often seen palling around with fellow billionaires including Elon Musk.

Peltz held a ritzy fundraiser for then-President Donald Trump leading up to the 2020 election, but told CNBC he was sorry for voting for him after the Jan. 6 riots.

He now spends most of his time in Florida, where Trian has an office and he lives with his wife, Claudia, a former model and the mother of eight of his children. Their expansive oceanfront property was once owned by Georgia O’Keeffe’s sister and her railroad baron husband.

Lackluster returns

Some of Trian’s investors were becoming uneasy in the past few years.

The firm had made a $2.5 billion bet in 2015 on General Electric, which had become an unwieldy conglomerate. In one of its famously dense white papers, Trian predicted GE’s stock price could gain 75% in the next two years with the right changes. Garden, who’d championed the investment, joined the board.

But a series of problems, including a $15 billion funding shortfall, pushed GE shares to their lowest levels in years and, by 2021, prompted GE to break itself apart. For a while, Trian was staring down well over $500 million of losses on the investment. (By now, it has roughly broken even.)

California State Teachers’ Retirement System, the big pension that had invested with Trian for years, submitted one of the largest requests to withdraw its money. The New York State Common Retirement Fund also notified Trian it intended to pull over a billion dollars.

Much of Trian’s money now comes from Asia and the Middle East, through sovereign-wealth funds of countries such as Kuwait. The full effect of the redemptions hasn’t necessarily been seen, given that most hedge funds require them to happen slowly.

Trian’s assets under management dropped from around $12.5 billion in 2015 to around $10 billion now, which includes well over $2 billion worth of Disney shares Peltz’s friend Perlmutter lent to its proxy fight effort.

From 2019 to 2023, Trian’s cumulative return in its flagship investment fund was 59%, or 9.7% annually. The S&P 500, by comparison, rose 87% over that period, or 14% annually.

Trian said it has had more money coming than going in the past two years. It also said since its inception, it has outperformed the S&P 500.

One question mark in Trian’s portfolio is Wendy’s, where Peltz, May and Matt are all on the board and the elder two have been involved for over 15 years. Its stock has barely budged over the past five years. Trian explored an acquisition of it in 2022 that it ended up not pursuing. (The fast-food chain reimburses Peltz for around $500,000 or more of professional security services each year.)

Shares of Dove-soap maker Unilever are also little changed since Peltz joined its board in 2022.

Trian’s best-performing investments in recent years include Ferguson, a British plumbing-supply company it bought shares of in 2019. It has returned an average of over 25% a year for the firm.

The fourth founder

Some Trian employees were growing frustrated as the profile of Nelson’s son, Matt, continued to rise in the past several years.

Matt Peltz joined Trian after graduating from Yale and completing a short stint at Goldman Sachs. Matt is a “Star Wars” fan and ancient Roman history buff whose frequent refrain in the Trian offices is: “We are students of business.”

In addition to driving investment ideas, Matt began traveling to see investors, often in place of the original founders. He has also been known to survey who is at their desks when he arrives in the morning.

“It was clear that at some point, Trian went from having three founders to having four,” one person said. The office dynamic prompted several employees to leave in recent years.

It also strained the relationship between Peltz and Garden, which was already complicated by the fact that Garden’s wife—Peltz’s daughter—was not on good terms with Peltz.

Last June, Trian announced Garden was leaving the firm. The following month he launched his own firm with another Trian alum. The news surprised many on Wall Street who had assumed he’d eventually take over.

Matt Peltz and another partner, Josh Frank, 45, were promoted to co-chief investment officers. Trian’s core decision makers are now those two, Nelson, May—who is Matt’s godfather—and two other partners, Head of Research Brian Baldwin and Chief Legal Officer Brian Schorr.

Frank specializes in consumer and industrials companies, while Baldwin specializes in financial companies. The two represent the firm on the board of asset-manager Janus Henderson in seats once held by Nelson and Garden.

The two have been behind several of the firm’s recent investments including Allstate and Unilever. Baldwin and another younger partner, Ryan Bunch, have been deeply involved in Disney.

“There’s a lot of positivity, energy and momentum in the firm,” Frank said in an interview.

‘I’d rather be rich than right’

Trian says it now employs around 50 people, and it is all hands on deck as the Disney vote approaches. Nelson, Matt and others are meeting with Disney investors one by one to make their case for adding Nelson and their other nominee, Disney’s former finance chief, Jay Rasulo, to the board.

Suggestions in its recent Disney white paper for on-again CEO Bob Iger include shrinking Hulu and improving the guest experience at its theme parks. Trian’s push got a big boost from Perlmutter, who entrusted his shares’ voting rights to Trian, contributing the vast majority of Trian’s stake.

Working against Trian could be the fact that Disney’s share price has already improved. The company last month reported better-than-expected earnings and unveiled a slew of major announcements, sending its stock up nearly 12% in one day.

Proxy advisers are expected to weigh in any day with how they recommend shareholders vote, and that could tip the scale in either side’s favor.

Trian could always back down before the vote, as it did last year following a short-lived campaign at Disney. Activists typically have many ways to make money—and Disney’s share price has already jumped from well under $100 to above $110 since Trian arrived. “I’d rather be rich than right” is one of Peltz’s oft-repeated lines at the office.

The bigger question is whether this could be one of Trian’s last big moments in the spotlight. Some wonder if it will still mount high-profile proxy fights once the next generation of leaders fully take over, which could be many years from now. Peltz’s mother lived to age 108.

For now, Peltz remains feared, even when taking on projects outside of the firm.

He, Perlmutter and real-estate titan Stephen Ross were part of a group that covertly tried to buy a local hospital not far from their Florida mansions in the past few years, aiming to secure high-quality care for the West Palm Beach area. While the men considered it a charitable endeavor, the hospital consulted investment bankers to fend them off.

Write to Cara Lombardo at cara.lombardo@wsj.com and Lauren Thomas at lauren.thomas@wsj.com

Peter Rudegeair contributed to this article.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/ot...c-race-to-remake-the-sports-giant/ar-BB1k3UTs

ESPN Boss Jimmy Pitaro’s Chaotic Race to Remake the Sports Giant

Cable TV’s collapse is forcing the Disney property out of its comfort zone, from hiring risky talent to a streaming gambit that ticked off the NFL

By Isabella Simonetti and Robbie Whelan
March 17, 2024 - 9:00 pm EDT

ESPN boss Jimmy Pitaro was keeping a big secret.

In January, Pitaro and executives at ESPN-parent Disney hosted a contingent of top NFL officials—including Commissioner Roger Goodell, and team owners Robert Kraft and Jerry Jones—at Disney’s Burbank, Calif., headquarters to discuss a potential deal.

On the table was a strategic partnership that would involve the NFL taking an equity stake in ESPN and coordinating streaming and TV efforts, said people familiar with the talks.

What the league didn’t know: Pitaro’s team at ESPN was quietly working on a totally separate deal to join forces with rival media companies on a sports-streaming service. When that venture was announced in February, the league was blindsided—and furious at being out of the loop.

As he gathered a few days later at the Super Bowl in Las Vegas with his team and a gaggle of sports celebrities, Goodell complained to one associate, “Why would Disney treat a partner this way?”

An NFL spokesman denied that Goodell made the comment.

Pitaro, who as ESPN’s chairman was an architect of the sports-streaming joint venture, got on the phone with NFL officials, telling one that the venture “will be good for the league and for fans.”

Six years into his tenure atop the world’s most storied sports-media company, the 54-year-old is racing to reinvent ESPN’s business and fend off the biggest threats it has faced in decades. That means stretching the company beyond its comfort zone.

Volatility in the media world forced Pitaro to pursue multiple streaming strategies at once, despite the risk of keeping a powerful league partner in the dark. He’s gambling that ESPN will build a big enough digital business to fill the financial hole being created as millions of Americans continue to cut the cable-TV cord.

Last year, Pitaro struck a deal to launch ESPN Bet, a gambling app that is a departure for the family-focused Disney, in a bid to draw in new audiences.

ESPN’s workplace has been volatile, too: The push for younger viewers led him to sign a huge deal with YouTube star Pat McAfee, an edgy, F-bomb-throwing host, that has backfired with some staff, leaving the impression he gives talent too much leeway.

ESPN’s cable business has shrunk to the point where it can no longer be the foundation for the future. Since 2011, the number of U.S. households paying for cable packages that include ESPN has fallen by about 29 million, reflecting a cable-TV industry collapse.

In its fiscal year ended Sept. 30—the first year Disney broke out ESPN’s financials—the division’s revenue was up 2% but profits fell 2%. In the past, ESPN had been the largest part of a media networks division whose profits steadily increased most years, making it the company’s most reliable financial engine, especially compared with the more volatile movie business.

“That’s a different environment to manage in than the previous periods of incredible growth that ESPN has experienced, right?” said Connor Schell, a former top programming executive at ESPN. “And that’s a hard job.”

Holding on to valuable live-sports rights—including ESPN’s package of NBA games—has become tougher in that financial landscape, and amid competition for those rights from new rivals such as Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV+. ESPN’s current NBA deal expires after the 2024-25 season and the network is in discussions to renew it, with an exclusive bargaining window expiring in April. Buying a smaller slate of games is one option on the table.

Pitaro is considered one of the contenders to succeed Disney CEO Bob Iger in 2026, when Iger’s contract expires and he has said he expects to step down. How Pitaro handles the next two years and the launch of the new streaming joint venture, expected in the fall, will go a long way in determining his chances.

Pitaro has earned a reputation as one of Iger’s most loyal lieutenants in a Disney career spanning 14 years. He took on top roles in interactive and consumer products before moving to ESPN.

One thing not on his résumé: experience in Hollywood, a strength held by some other contenders inside Disney.

“Do I think he’s the front-runner? No,” said an entertainment executive who has known Pitaro for years. “But you gotta at least give him a strong look.”

‘Discuss, debate, decide, align’

People who have worked with Pitaro describe him as a relentless consensus builder. His willingness to admit what he doesn’t know has won over colleagues, said Schell, the former content executive.

“I think there’s a lot of people who would’ve come into the job and been afraid to admit that maybe they had never been in a production truck before,” Schell said. “Jimmy instead turned that into a huge strength.”

Pitaro likes to toss around a management motto: “Discuss, debate, decide, align.” The idea is that, no matter how thorny the issue, everyone eventually needs to get on the same page.

Pitaro’s critics, including some former staffers and associates, said the real world is rarely as neat as that motto suggests. He needs to be more forceful to get things done and has trouble saying no, including to talent, they said. Others said Pitaro dwells too long on tough decisions, pointing to ESPN’s yearslong effort to find a partner in the sports-wagering world in order to launch the ESPN Bet app.

Pitaro’s boosters said he showed patience to find what they called the right sports-betting deal for ESPN and pointed to an array of rights deals he has struck with leagues including the NFL, NHL and MLB to retain key sports content.

They said he showed his toughness as a negotiator by walking away from a longstanding partnership with the Big Ten collegiate conference after determining the financials didn’t add up.

Pitaro grew up in Scarsdale, an affluent New York suburb, with a father who was a contractor and mother who managed a computer system in a store. He has family ties to the entertainment business: His sister is the general counsel of Major League Baseball, and his wife, Jean Louisa Kelly, is an actress whose credits include “Mr. Holland’s Opus” and “Top Gun: Maverick.”

After playing running back and wide receiver for Cornell University’s football team and getting a law degree at St. John’s University, Pitaro started his sports media career at Yahoo. He was introduced to Iger in 2010 by Sheryl Sandberg, the former Facebook executive and Disney board member, who has been friends with Pitaro for years. He joined Disney as co-president of its interactive unit, carrying out large-scale layoffs that helped the struggling division reach profitability.

An avid sports fan whose dog Jeter is named after the former New York Yankees legend, Pitaro always dreamed of running ESPN. When the top job at the network became available in late 2017, Pitaro beat out other internal contenders. “Sports have been the soundtrack of my life,” Pitaro had told Iger, he recalled in an interview with a Cornell publication.

A big part of the job is managing a cable-TV business that’s in decline but whose profits are still critical for Disney. While its growth has flattened out, ESPN still generated $2.8 billion in operating income in 2023, a big reason the entertainment giant could sustain $2.5 billion in losses in the streaming unit that includes Disney+.

ESPN’s TV ratings were up 2% in 2023 and 8% the year before, according to the company, even though the number of households that have the channel keeps declining due to cord-cutting. Quality games on “Monday Night Football” have helped, while studio shows like “First Take” and “Get Up” also posted strong gains.

Strategic partners

About a year ago, Pitaro ordered the network to lay the groundwork for a direct-to-consumer ESPN service featuring all the programming from the flagship TV channel. There were major risks. How would cable distributors who pay to carry the ESPN TV channel react? What if the plan accelerated the death of cable without replacing its riches? Pitaro batted around those issues with his team and pressed ahead.

At Iger’s behest, ESPN last summer began exploring potential strategic partners who could help advance those streaming plans. Former Disney CEO Bob Chapek had pursued similar discussions during his tenure, holding talks with companies including sports-merchandise firm Fanatics and Hollywood agency titan Endeavor, people familiar with the situation said.

Disney retained Kevin Mayer, its former head of strategy, and Tom Staggs, a former Disney CFO and parks chief, to advise on the new round of strategic talks. They brought extensive dealmaking chops and were meant to complement Pitaro.

ESPN pursued discussions with major sports leagues, including the NFL. The idea was that the NFL would offload media businesses such as its NFL Network and RedZone channels in exchange for an equity stake in ESPN. The two sides would also look to coordinate efforts in streaming, and ESPN would likely get access to more NFL games.

Initially, it looked like a long shot. By the time Goodell and the owners—Kraft of the New England Patriots and Jones of the Dallas Cowboys—were visiting Disney in January, talks had heated up.

But the NFL had no idea that Pitaro and his team were working on another streaming idea in addition to a stand-alone ESPN service.

Pitaro had begun to think there was an opportunity to give consumers an option beyond that single ESPN streaming service, which is continuing in development and will likely cost around $30 a month.

He imagined a bigger sports platform in partnership with other media companies. The idea was that while some people might only need ESPN programming, others might want to see games carried on other channels and would be willing to pay more for that.

Executives at other companies, including Fox Corp.CEO Lachlan Murdoch and Warner Bros. Discovery chief David Zaslav, had been thinking along similar lines, and before long the rivals were in deep talks.

On Feb. 6, a day before Disney reported quarterly earnings, The Wall Street Journal broke the news that the three companies were launching a joint venture to pool their sports programming and offer it in a bundle comprising 14 channels including ESPN, ABC, Fox, TNT and TBS. That service is likely to cost in the zone of $50 a month.

Pitaro called Goodell shortly before the company’s press release went out, which the NFL didn’t see as a legitimate heads up, according to people familiar with the matter. Irritating the NFL, which decides which networks carry which games and can be a major ally for ESPN in the streaming business, was risky.

Disney executives said confidentiality agreements prevented them from sharing information about the sports joint-venture with league partners.

Pitaro, who has made cultivating good relations with the NFL a priority during his tenure, sought to smooth things over in follow-up calls with Brian Rolapp, the league’s top media executive. He emphasized that the new sports venture could reach a lot of people who don’t subscribe to cable.

“The NFL’s relationship with ESPN is as strong as it has been in years and much of the credit for that goes to Jimmy’s leadership,” an NFL spokesman said in a statement.

As it continues talks with ESPN, the NFL is also exploring other strategic partnerships, a person familiar with the matter said.

How the new streaming joint venture performs will be a major piece of Pitaro’s legacy as ESPN’s top executive. If the price point is too high and it fails to win over enough consumers, ESPN will have to find new ways to establish itself in the streaming world. If the service is successful, it could reshape the sports-media landscape and improve Pitaro’s chances of winning Disney’s top job.

On Friday, ESPN said Pete Distad, a former top executive at Apple, will serve as chief executive of the new joint venture.

McAfee reprimand

As ESPN plotted a streaming strategy, Pitaro was also concerned with making the network more appealing to digital-savvy audiences, and McAfee was a big part of that plan.

ESPN signed a five-year deal worth more than $85 million to license “The Pat McAfee Show,” a daily broadcast that went on ESPN’s air in September while simulcasting on YouTube. Pitaro knew there were risks in allowing McAfee’s profanity-laced, casual-bro-chat brand of sports talk onto the network.

That became apparent in a chaotic few weeks early this year. McAfee brought NFL star Aaron Rodgers on for regular appearances, and in one telecast Rodgers made a controversial remark about comedian Jimmy Kimmel—falsely insinuating that he had ties to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The comment threatened to land the network in hot water. Frustrated, Pitaro told McAfee that such incidents needed to be avoided, and that conspiracy theories by guests should be fact-checked in real-time, according to people familiar with their exchange.

It seemed like the issue was resolved when McAfee said on a Jan. 10 telecast that Rodgers’s regular appearances were over for the rest of the NFL season. But the next day, Rodgers was back on the show.

McAfee had told Pitaro that he intended to bring back Rodgers for major breaking news, and the exit of Bill Belichick as the Patriots’ head coach met that threshold, so he invited Rodgers back.

But Pitaro was still expecting a heads up—and didn’t get one. In the parlance of Pitaro’s management motto, he wasn’t “aligned” with McAfee.

Around the same time, McAfee used his show to air complaints about ESPN colleagues and called out one executive, Norby Williamson, by name, saying he was behind leaked ratings for McAfee’s program.

ESPN privately reprimanded McAfee for speaking ill of a colleague on air. Publicly, the company issued a statement of support to both McAfee and Williamson.

While McAfee’s TV ratings lag behind “First Take,” the morning sports debate program that is ESPN’s No. 1 talk show, many viewers watch on YouTube. The show has logged more than 340 million YouTube views since McAfee started in September, 60% from viewers 18 to 34 years old, helping to lift ESPN’s YouTube viewership 12%.

Some people close to ESPN said Pitaro went too easy on McAfee—indicative, they say, of how he gives stars too much leeway. Other ESPN network personalities and staffers have been suspended over the years for making offensive comments. In 2010, for example, anchor Tony Kornheiser was suspended for two weeks after he called a SportsCenter anchor’s outfit “horrifying” on his radio show.

Pitaro prefers to deal with any flare-ups with talent privately and doesn’t see suspensions as the only effective form of discipline, a person close to him said.

Beyond sports

Pitaro has become more open to the idea of network personalities weighing in on hot-button social and political issues. Under his predecessor, the network faced backlash when on-air commentators made partisan comments, and Pitaro had encouraged a shift away from that. “I do not believe that we are a political organization,” he told employees early in his tenure.

But events in 2020, especially the national racial and social justice reckoning after the murder of George Floyd at the hands of police, changed the equation. “It was unavoidable that we were gonna find ourselves veering beyond the world of sports,” said Stephen A. Smith, ESPN’s biggest star and the host and executive producer of “First Take.”

Elle Duncan, an anchor on the flagship studio show SportsCenter who has spoken publicly about abortion and LGBTQ rights, said Pitaro is supportive of her view that these are moral and human-rights issues. “They’re not political issues. They have nothing to do with red versus blue,” she said.

Smith gets a lot of freedom. When he sought permission to host a podcast that is unaffiliated with ESPN, Pitaro felt keeping Smith happy was worth the risk that he might say something that would reflect poorly on the network and allowed it.

In January, as Smith prepared to tape a podcast episode, he alerted Pitaro and other Disney executives that “they were not going to recognize the person that they heard,” Smith said in an interview.

He then went on the show and launched into a rant against Jason Whitlock, a former ESPN employee who, like Smith, is a prominent Black sports commentator. Smith said Whitlock, who had questioned the veracity of his memoir, was worse than white supremacists and called him the “worst, most despicable, lying, no-good, fat-*** human being I have ever known in my life.”

The tirade went viral and wasn’t well received in ESPN’s headquarters. Whitlock responded, calling Smith a “fraud” and “pathological liar.”

As for Pitaro, Smith said, “We haven’t spoken about it, but I’m quite sure he wasn’t happy about it.”

Write to Isabella Simonetti at isabella.simonetti@wsj.com and Robbie Whelan at robbie.whelan@wsj.com
 
https://deadline.com/2024/03/hollywood-job-losses-executives-full-scale-depression-1235841674/

Hollywood Contraction Hits Entertainment Executive Jobs: “This Is A Full-Scale Depression”

By Nellie Andreeva - Co-Editor-in-Chief, TV
March 18, 2024 - 7:30am PDT

Editor’s note: This is the latest installment in the Deadline series Hollywood Contraction, which examines the toll the job losses caused by the ongoing industrywide cost-cutting has had on different sections of the entertainment community.

LinkedIn is usually used by professionals for networking with people in their field, posting updates when they get a new job or congratulating friends on their promotions.

These days, as one former industry type put it, “it’s become a therapy site for unemployed entertainment executives” who share their frustrations over the lack of opportunities in Hollywood amid a major contraction.

“I’ve seen lots of downturns, lots of job losses but I’ve never seen anything like this,” one veteran top TV executive said. “This is a full-scale depression for the entertainment industry.”

Over the past year, there have been waves of layoffs at Disney, Warner Bros Discovery, Paramount, NBCUniversal, Amazon MGM Studios, Lionsgate (which acquired eOne), Netflix, Sony, Fifth Season and most talent agencies including CAA and UTA.

The dire situation, “bordering on worst-case scenario,” the seasoned TV executive said, was created by a perfect storm of Covid, strikes and “poor management decisions coming home to roost” driven by short-sighted moves by media companies aimed at goosing their quarterly reports to appease Wall Street.

Those venting about their experiences on LinkedIn say that they have sent hundreds of job applications and never got a response to the majority of them, not even from HR. Some have been on the sidelines for more than a year while trying to pick up consulting and other part-time gigs to pay the bills.

The more senior executives turn to headhunters.

“I have certainly an influx of executives that reach out and say, they’re looking for their next [job],” said top Hollywood executive recruiter Jamie Waldron, Senior Partner, Global Head of Sports, Media + Entertainment, at Modern Executive Solutions. His “conservative estimate” is that “a good 20%” of the VP-and-above executive workforce in media and entertainment is out of work from a year ago.

Based on his observations, legal and marketing executives have been heavily impacted, followed closely by development execs.

“There is no doubt a contraction,” Waldron added. “It just makes it tough in the short term I feel like, with a lot of good executives. I can’t meet everybody that wants to meet to talk about that they’re about to be unemployed or this layoffs now happening.”

For many newly unemployed execs it’s been a major adjustment, losing a lofty salary with bonuses and stock but also perks such as company cars and expense accounts.

Most of those that have met with Waldron have put on a brave face, saying they feel great about taking a break and are happy to spend time with their kids. “And some are honest, ‘No, I’m scared,’ ” he said.

During the strikes, Waldron, whose father, 91, is a former writer and still a WGA member, said he was “looking at the fear and listening to all the stories of the writers and actors that are losing their houses.”

“What was kind of lost in the story was executives were doing the same thing, executives that were laid off were losing their houses and the private school tuition for their kids, and those jobs didn’t come back because either the contraction of the industry, or they’re waiting for them to come back,” he said.
Impact on salaries and morale

The lack of jobs and fear among out-of-work executives who have to provide for their families is pushing down salaries.

“The upper upper-level executives will be fine,” the former top TV executive said. “Presidents used to make $4 million-$6 million a year, now they will make $2.5 million-$3 million. Middle-level executives were making $250,000-$750,000. All will now be reduced. With fewer jobs and more demand, the companies can get away with that. An executive who made $500,000 in their last job would now be willing to take a $350,000 offer. That’s what the contraction is doing.”

Added the ex-executive, The opportunities that once existed — exorbitant salaries, bonuses, stock grabs — will all go away.”

The constant string of layoffs also is affecting the entertainment executives who have kept their jobs and often have to take on more work as a result of the staff cuts.

“The morale is low,” another former TV executive said. “People feel overworked and under-appreciated and those who were there for the hayday of the industry feel like the glory days, the fun and glamor of showbiz, are no longer there.”
Employment in post-Peak TV era

There have been mass layoff events following major mergers over the past few years, including the Disney acquisition of Fox assets in 2019 and the Discovery-WarnerMedia linkup in 2022, and jobs also were lost during the pandemic. But for across-the-industry deep payroll cuts of the current magnitude, observers point back to around 2009, the period of the Great Recession, which also included a WGA strike.

Things bounced back then. People are divided whether the same would happen this time.

“It’s not even remotely coming back,” a veteran TV executive said.

Another seasoned TV exec is a little more optimistic, but with a big caveat.

“After larger layoffs and austerity measures, it always goes back. Historically at every company, two years later, they are larger than they were going in,” the person said, underscoring that up until now, the volume of TV content had steadily increased, fueled by the expansion of original programming in cable and then streaming. “Studios go back to being bigger than they were before the layoffs in 2-3 years because it’s been a growth industry.”

That may no longer be the case.

FX topper John Landgraf in February declared Peak TV over as the number of original English-language scripted series fell 12% to 516 from the all-time high of 600 in 2022; he projected a further slide to 400-450 series within the next few years. The year 2022 was pivotal, with the industry shifting gears to kick off the current contraction.

Part of an overall correction in the media business amid cost-cutting efforts in search of profitability, the shift has affected employment in the industry that nearly matched its 2016 peak in August 2022 at almost 160,000 people but has shrunk by 26% since then, including a 17% drop from April to October 2023, according to the Otis College of Art and Design’s “The Day After Tomorrow” study released last December.

“The bigger picture reveals that Peak TV, rather than the strikes, represents the more enduring threat to employment in the Industry,” the study said. An arms race among streaming platforms heralded a surge in production between 2016 and 2022, as platforms pursued subscriber growth at all costs. As this business model has transitioned into one that emphasizes profitability and sustainability, we have likely reached the highwater mark in production.”

Entertainment companies’ production cost-cutting has impacted a favorite avenue for former development executives, becoming non-writing executive producers with a first-look or overall deal. The number of such pacts has been greatly reduced over the last couple of years, putting even more execs on the sidelines.
Light at the end of the tunnel?

Waldron tries to stay upbeat.

“I feel like sometimes I’m too optimistic, but I feel optimistic about every time we have a contraction in our business, it takes a beat, and there’s there’s employment again,” he said. “Good talent does get hired. I feel like there’s good talent on the sidelines only for a certain amount of time and then they are working again.”

Waldron believes we would see the first signs of improvement in the entertainment executive job market soon.

“I think it will be this year,” he said. “I think that, at least what I’m hearing and seeing in talking with different clients is, Q1 — and we’re almost in Q2 — is kind of absorbing what just happened with the strikes and implications, the contraction of things. I think by Q3 and Q4, we’ll start to see a more aggressive approach into hiring execs again.”

There is an asterisk with that projection: potential mergers. As rumors continue to swirl about Paramount’s future as a stand-alone company, there may be more media consolidation in the next year or so, with Warner Bros Discovery also a target of merger speculation.

One difference from 2009 is the influx of private equity money as, backed by investment, entertainment companies like Legendary and Peter Chernin’s North Road have been hiring. Private equity spending cooled in Q3 and Q4 of 2023, but Waldron expects it to pick up.

“I think there’s still plenty of money to be invested into companies to buy them and make them bigger, stronger, better,” he said, adding, “I think what’s going to happen is that it may not be the traditional studios that are hiring back again in Q3 and Q4, it may take longer, may take into next year, but I think hiring a really good senior executive in other areas, that sort of thing can happen.”

One of those areas is in sports, where a number of entertainment executives have transitioned, especially in the marketing, business and PR areas.

For instance, Vicky Free Sistrunk, who spent 14 years as a marketing executive at Turner, Chief Marketing Officer for BET and SVP Marketing for Disney/ABC Studios, became Head of Global Marketing for sportswear giant Adidas in 2000 and is currently Chief Impact Officer for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

Still, the pull of Hollywood is strong despite it being a 24/7, stress-heavy environment, which probably explains why so many unemployed entertainment executives have put up the #OpenToWork green banner on their LinkedIn profiles.

“I honestly think entertainment is one of the greatest industries to work in,” a former TV executive said. “You get to work with creative, broad range of skill-based individuals; you get to use cutting-edge technology to improve the experience; there is growth opportunities, and you get very well paid compared to other fields.”

For those trying to go back, Waldron has advice.

“I think they should continue to network and hang in there because it will get better,” he said. “Meet whoever tells you that you should meet this person or that person, network outside of your comfort zone. Don’t just talk to your circle of friends and your few agents, reach out introduce yourself to other agents in other parts of the business.”
Exit Only, No Re-Entry for some

Even with the right strategy and under the best of circumstances, not all unemployed executives would be able to return to the entertainment industry.

“Out of the 20%, I would think 15% would. I think you’re going to lose 5% who are going to call it a day,” Waldron said. “I think at a certain point they do feel like, I’m not going to get that next job. Part of it is, if you’re a middle-age white man, you’re feeling really struggling to see if you’re going to be hired again.”

One such development executive with 25 years of experience lost his job about a decade ago. After looking unsuccessfully for about four years, he went into the insurance business, and he’s still struggling to get back into entertainment.

There are others like him from various areas of entertainment and demographics. Insurance and real estate are two areas where dozens of entertainment executives and agents and managers have transitioned, while marketing and PR executives have been targeting gaming, tech, sports and other fields. Some have left Los Angeles for a lower cost of living and better quality of life. Some have pursued a longtime passion, like becoming a therapist, life coach or meditation business owner.

This will likely happen to a number of the entertainment executives currently out of work. So for the film and TV writers out there, next time you need a realtor, insurance broker, a therapist of a life coach, they also may be able to give you notes on your script.
 


https://deadline.com/2024/03/disney-help-nelson-peltz-proxy-advisory-firm-backs-company-1235861198/

Disney Notches Win Against Nelson Peltz As Influential Proxy Advisory Firm Backs Company’s Board​


By Jill Goldsmith
March 18, 2024 8:38am

Proxy advisory firm Glass Lewis has recommended that Disney shareholders withhold votes for all board candidates except the company’s own.

A thumbs up from the influential firm, which advise stockholders how they should vote on various matters at annual meetings, is a significant win for Disney as institutional investors take the recommendations of these firms quite seriously an have been waiting to see how they would line up. Another large advisory firm, ISS, hasn’t yet put out its report.

Glass Lewis cited “measurable shifts” in Disney’s strategy since CEO Bob Iger’s return in advising stockholders to withhold votes from Trian Group’s two candidates as well as from the three candidates nominated by investment firm They advise stockholders to vote only for Disney’s 12 nominees at the meeting set for April 3.

“We are pleased that Glass Lewis recognizes the strength of our highly qualified nominees and supports our plans to return this iconic company to a period of sustained growth and shareholder value creation,” said Mark Parker, chairman of the board. “In its recommendation, Glass Lewis clearly identifies the strength of the diverse skillsets across our Board nominees, the credibility of our succession planning process and recent changes to the Board and compensation program and the promise of our recent efforts to bolster growth and value creation to position Disney for the future.”

Disney has been engaged in a bitter and expensive battle with Trian, which is seeking board seats for its founder-CEO Nelson Peltz as well as for former Disney executive Jay Rasulo. Both sides have been engaging with shareholders to win votes amid a marketing blitz of videos, town halls and white papers.

In making its recommendation, Glass Lewis noted that Disney “is undertaking what we consider to be a credible effort to shift key operational priorities under the leadership of one of the most well-respected CEOs in the industry … While it remains too early to say with certainty that each of those programs will prove successful, we believe it is similarly too early to suggest there exists adequate cause for investors to support alternate solicitations which may prove significantly less accretive to Disney’s trajectory, by comparison.”

Peltz has knocked Disney’s share price, strategic vision and the ability of its current board to provide accountability.

Disney and Iger acknowledge the complexities of the current media landscape but insist that’s all the more reason why a highly experienced Iger and current management should be running the ship — without distraction. The company has said Jay Rasulo’s been away from Disney too long to be effective and that neither candidate has offered any meaningful suggestions.

Streaming is approaching profitability and the company is mapping out a path to reviving its film studio. Iger and Disney have announced a number of strategic initiatives in recent months, including a new streaming sports JV, an investment in Epic Games and the sale of its Star assets in India to Reliance.
 
https://deadline.com/2024/03/disney-help-nelson-peltz-proxy-advisory-firm-backs-company-1235861198/

Disney Notches Win Against Nelson Peltz As Influential Proxy Advisory Firm Backs Company’s Board​


By Jill Goldsmith
March 18, 2024 8:38am

Proxy advisory firm Glass Lewis has recommended that Disney shareholders withhold votes for all board candidates except the company’s own.

A thumbs up from the influential firm, which advise stockholders how they should vote on various matters at annual meetings, is a significant win for Disney as institutional investors take the recommendations of these firms quite seriously an have been waiting to see how they would line up. Another large advisory firm, ISS, hasn’t yet put out its report.

These "proxy advisory firms" must be something that institutional investors look to for guidance? As an individual investor, I've never heard of them, much less received any advice from them.
 
https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news...ger-in-proxy-fight-with-nelson-peltz/3245253/

George Lucas backs Disney CEO Bob Iger in proxy fight with Nelson Peltz
By Becky Quick,CNBC • 3/19/24

  • Filmmaker and Hollywood legend George Lucas is endorsing Walt Disney CEO Bob Iger in the bitter proxy battle launched by activist investor Nelson Peltz.
  • Lucas is currently the largest individual investor in the company, multiple sources confirmed to CNBC.
  • His support is key because of his shareholder status and his standing in Hollywood.
Filmmaker and Hollywood legend George Lucas is throwing his support behind Walt Disney CEO Bob Iger in the bitter proxy battle between the company and activist investor Nelson Peltz.

Lucas, who received 37.1 million Disney shares as part of Disney's $4.05 billion purchase of Lucasfilm in 2012, is currently the largest individual investor in the company, multiple sources confirmed to CNBC.

In a statement provided to CNBC, Lucas wrote:

"Creating magic is not for amateurs. When I sold Lucasfilm just over a decade ago, I was delighted to become a Disney shareholder because of my long-time admiration for its iconic brand and Bob Iger's leadership. When Bob recently returned to the company during a difficult time, I was relieved. No one knows Disney better. I remain a significant shareholder because I have full faith and confidence in the power of Disney and Bob's track record of driving long-term value. I have voted all of my shares for Disney's 12 directors and urge other shareholders to do the same."
Disney has lined up a number of high-profile endorsements in its battle against Peltz and his firm, Trian Fund Management, from the heirs of Walt and Roy Disney to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon.

But the support from the Lucas endorsement is key, not only because of his role as Disney's largest individual shareholder, but also because of his standing in Hollywood. Lucas wrote and created the "Star Wars" and "Indiana Jones" franchises, some of the most popular films in history, and he helped pioneer tools such as digital film editing and computer-generated imagery.

Peltz has asked investors to nominate him and former Disney Chief Financial Officer Jay Rasulo to the board at its annual general meeting on April 3. Among other things, Peltz wants to overhaul Disney's traditional TV channels, which he thinks have been a shrinking business.

Iger, meanwhile, has been trying to streamline the sprawling media company to rein in spending and make its Disney+ streaming platform profitable. Iger has instituted broad restructuring, including thousands of layoffs.



 


https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news...ger-in-proxy-fight-with-nelson-peltz/3245253/

George Lucas backs Disney CEO Bob Iger in proxy fight with Nelson Peltz
By Becky Quick,CNBC • 3/19/24

  • Filmmaker and Hollywood legend George Lucas is endorsing Walt Disney CEO Bob Iger in the bitter proxy battle launched by activist investor Nelson Peltz.
  • Lucas is currently the largest individual investor in the company, multiple sources confirmed to CNBC.
  • His support is key because of his shareholder status and his standing in Hollywood.
Filmmaker and Hollywood legend George Lucas is throwing his support behind Walt Disney CEO Bob Iger in the bitter proxy battle between the company and activist investor Nelson Peltz.

Lucas, who received 37.1 million Disney shares as part of Disney's $4.05 billion purchase of Lucasfilm in 2012, is currently the largest individual investor in the company, multiple sources confirmed to CNBC.

In a statement provided to CNBC, Lucas wrote:

"Creating magic is not for amateurs. When I sold Lucasfilm just over a decade ago, I was delighted to become a Disney shareholder because of my long-time admiration for its iconic brand and Bob Iger's leadership. When Bob recently returned to the company during a difficult time, I was relieved. No one knows Disney better. I remain a significant shareholder because I have full faith and confidence in the power of Disney and Bob's track record of driving long-term value. I have voted all of my shares for Disney's 12 directors and urge other shareholders to do the same."
Disney has lined up a number of high-profile endorsements in its battle against Peltz and his firm, Trian Fund Management, from the heirs of Walt and Roy Disney to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon.

But the support from the Lucas endorsement is key, not only because of his role as Disney's largest individual shareholder, but also because of his standing in Hollywood. Lucas wrote and created the "Star Wars" and "Indiana Jones" franchises, some of the most popular films in history, and he helped pioneer tools such as digital film editing and computer-generated imagery.

Peltz has asked investors to nominate him and former Disney Chief Financial Officer Jay Rasulo to the board at its annual general meeting on April 3. Among other things, Peltz wants to overhaul Disney's traditional TV channels, which he thinks have been a shrinking business.

Iger, meanwhile, has been trying to streamline the sprawling media company to rein in spending and make its Disney+ streaming platform profitable. Iger has instituted broad restructuring, including thousands of layoffs.



George Lucas compared Disney leaders with white slavers about 10 years ago during an interview with Charlie Rose. Interesting endorsement. Have the guy that called you a slaver say you are the right person for the job.
 
George Lucas compared Disney leaders with white slavers about 10 years ago during an interview with Charlie Rose. Interesting endorsement. Have the guy that called you a slaver say you are the right person for the job.

I don't think he meant that to refer to any particular people, just the big Hollywood machine as a whole. He did always try to stay away from all that.
 
I don't think he meant that to refer to any particular people, just the big Hollywood machine as a whole. He did always try to stay away from all that.
https://variety.com/2015/film/news/star-wars-george-lucas-disney-white-slavers-1201669959/

“I sold them to the white slavers that takes these things, and…,” Lucas said before laughing and deciding it better not to finish.

I'm pretty sure the "white slavers" here is Disney (not Hollywood, because after all he is a cog in the Hollywood machine). And, George Lucas laughed too, so obviously, he felt that comparing Disney to "white slavers" is humorous.

Bob Iger should pick better a person for an endorsement, regardless of the volume of stock that the person may own.
 
https://variety.com/2015/film/news/star-wars-george-lucas-disney-white-slavers-1201669959/

“I sold them to the white slavers that takes these things, and…,” Lucas said before laughing and deciding it better not to finish.

I'm pretty sure the "white slavers" here is Disney (not Hollywood, because after all he is a cog in the Hollywood machine). And, George Lucas laughed too, so obviously, he felt that comparing Disney to "white slavers" is humorous.

Bob Iger should pick better a person for an endorsement, regardless of the volume of stock that the person may own.

I disagree. I think he jsut meant the big studios in general. He always valued his independence. I don't think he meant individual people at any rate. It was just some very colorful language as George is prone to use. He couldn't have really been too unhappy considering he has visited the sets of almost every Star Wars production they have put out since to offer advice and support. It's really just not a big deal at all.
 
I disagree. I think he jsut meant the big studios in general. He always valued his independence. I don't think he meant individual people at any rate. It was just some very colorful language as George is prone to use. He couldn't have really been too unhappy considering he has visited the sets of almost every Star Wars production they have put out since to offer advice and support. It's really just not a big deal at all.
He also apologized for those comments not long after he said them:

“I misspoke and used a very inappropriate analogy, and for that I apologize,” the 71-year-old filmmaker said in a statement. “I have been working with Disney for 40 years and chose them as the custodians of Star Wars because of my great respect for the company and Bob Iger’s leadership.”

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/george-lucas-sorry-white-slavers-851661/
 
He also apologized for those comments not long after he said them:

“I misspoke and used a very inappropriate analogy, and for that I apologize,” the 71-year-old filmmaker said in a statement. “I have been working with Disney for 40 years and chose them as the custodians of Star Wars because of my great respect for the company and Bob Iger’s leadership.”

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/george-lucas-sorry-white-slavers-851661/

Right. He clearly meant it as a bit tongue-in-cheek anyway. He has always had his issues with the big studios and Hollywood as a whole. That doesn't mean he hasn't had good relationships with them. That quote is much ado about nothing.
 
The Abigail Disney turnaround was much more shocking than the Lucas endorsement. She basically called Iger the devil, stealing wages from cast members living in cars, making way too much money, etc, etc. She said it in print, in a movie, in dozens of interviews. "The devil you know" i guess????

George immediately walked back his comment, never said a bad think about Iger, and as Brian said, it could have been more directed at Hollywood as a whole - don't forget, Lucasfilm is headquartered in Northern CA, a completely different world from HW.
 
The Abigail Disney turnaround was much more shocking than the Lucas endorsement. She basically called Iger the devil, stealing wages from cast members living in cars, making way too much money, etc, etc. She said it in print, in a movie, in dozens of interviews. "The devil you know" i guess????

George immediately walked back his comment, never said a bad think about Iger, and as Brian said, it could have been more directed at Hollywood as a whole - don't forget, Lucasfilm is headquartered in Northern CA, a completely different world from HW.

Right, and he purposefully moved up tehre to get away from the big studios. Once he had his money, he was going to do it his way - "No notes!" that doesn't mean he dislikes the people working at the studios or anything. It was a jokey comment.
 
https://www.latimes.com/entertainme...ney-nelson-peltz-proxy-campaign-the-wide-shot

Will Nelson Peltz’s Disney proxy campaign prove to be a costly distraction?​


BY RYAN FAUGHNDERCOMPANY TOWN SENIOR EDITOR
MARCH 19, 2024 3 AM PT

The latest fight over the future of the Walt Disney Co. is headed into its home stretch, with the company’s April 3 shareholder meeting fast approaching. This is the moment when investors will decide whether to shake up the Disney board by voting to replace one or more of the Burbank entertainment giant’s directors with someone dissatisfied with its performance.

A recent recovery in Disney’s share price seemed to sew up a likely victory for Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger and the company’s nominees, with analysts speculating that it would deflate the proxy campaign waged by billionaire Nelson Peltz, whose New York-based Trian Fund Management beneficially owns $3.5 billion in company stock. But if Disney were certain that Peltz’s quest is purely a quixotic one, it’s not acting like it. Instead, the company is doing everything it can to undermine Peltz’s efforts.

It’s easy enough to understand why Iger would bristle at the thought of an outsider coming in to criticize his strategy as he tries to turn the company around. Iger’s first 15-year run as CEO made Disney the envy of the entertainment industry, with killer brands and unrivaled box office success. Now he’s back after the botched transfer of power to Bob Chapek, and the company has been struggling, as Peltz has repeatedly pointed out. Iger’s legacy is at stake.

Making matters worse and more personal for Iger, Peltz is joined by former Disney chief financial officer Jay Rasulo and ex-Marvel Entertainment chief Ike Perlmutter, both of whom left the company on bad terms.

Disney, naturally, wants a decisive victory here and it’s not taking any chances in communications with investors, highlighting the many strides it has made to improve performance while also hitting hard against its opponents. Working in Iger’s favor is the fact that Disney’s prospects have improved lately, as The Times’ Meg James has reported.

Iger has shored up public support from JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and the heirs of Walt and Roy Disney, including Abigail Disney, who is Walt’s grand niece and a frequent critic of the company’s executive compensation practices. On Monday, Disney issued a statement summarizing a report from corporate governance advisory firm Glass, Lewis & Co., which endorsed Disney’s nominees. “We struggle to see many of Trian’s intentions as representing a likely net gain for investors,” Glass Lewis said.

Last week, Disney unveiled a political-style attack ad aimed at Peltz and his co-nominee, Rasulo, which blasted the former’s credentials and accomplishments on the boards of other companies and characterized the latter as a bitter ex-employee who left after being “passed over for a promotion nearly a decade ago.” The video also made sure to hammer home the association with Perlmutter, who was ousted last year and whose rivalry with Iger is well documented. Perlmutter owns the majority of the Disney shares beneficially controlled by Trian.

Quoth the ominous voice-over, “Nelson Peltz has a long history of attacking companies to the ultimate detriment of shareholder value.”

Peltz and his allies bristled at the ad’s characterization, describing it as hyperbolic mudslinging. “In our view, this charged and disingenuous rhetoric seems calculated to distract shareholders from Disney’s poor track record and sidestep accountability,” Trian said in a statement. Peltz and Rasulo are not looking to replace or oust Iger, but rather are vying to topple current board members Michael B.G. Froman and Maria Elena Lagomasino.

“[T]he cold truth is that neither of them has helped Disney retain its leadership position in the media landscape,” Trian said in a letter to Disney shareholders.

Further, Trian says Disney has mischaracterized its performance history, which has included investments in DuPont, Heinz and Wendy’s. Citing a lengthy white paper, Trian has said that for the 11 of the firm’s investments in which Peltz joined the board, these companies delivered 17% average annualized returns through the end of 2023.

Let’s put forth the steel-man version of Peltz’s case. As my colleague Stacy Perman wrote recently, Peltz isn’t the type of investor to get in for a quick flip. He’s known, instead, for taking long-term positions in companies. And some corporate leaders who fought to avoid Peltz joining their boards ended up praising him after he succeeded. Trian’s website includes testimonials from former Heinz CEO Bill Johnson and Mondelēz International boss Dirk Van de Put.

“He’s not a corporate raider like Carl Icahn,” Los Angeles investor and deal-maker Lloyd Greif told The Times last month. “I think he’s much more experienced in running companies. A lot of these guys were financial engineers, and they would come into a company and immediately look at, how do we break this company up to maximize value.”

Looking at Disney from a long-term perspective, it’s clear that the company has disappointed in recent years. Sure, the stock is up more than 35% from six months ago. But it’s still down from the same time in 2022, the year the bloom was coming off of the streaming rose. Compared with five years ago, the stock is essentially flat. The company has underperformed the S&P 500 over the last five years.

Trian’s diagnoses of Disney’s ailments are varied, and some of them are difficult to dispute. For example, Peltz’s missives frequently note that Disney has had a poor track record of succession planning, and even the company’s staunchest defenders would be hard pressed to argue with that assertion.

Other critiques are less clear cut, but defensible. Trian, for example, contends that Disney’s $71 billion acquisition of 21st Century Fox was “strategically flawed,” in part because it represented a doubling down on linear networks at time when the industry was getting walloped by cord-cutting.

While Disney can say that Iger’s deal with Rupert Murdoch got it prized assets, including “Avatar,” “The Simpsons” and control of Hulu, the purchase has certainly been a mixed bag so far. For example, Disney has now effectively exited the Indian media business it acquired with the Fox deal by merging it into a Reliance Industries-controlled joint venture, taking a write-down on Star India.

Peltz & Co. argue that Disney was late in recognizing the threat of streaming, though Iger was ahead of the curve among legacy media CEOs in candidly acknowledging the impact of changing audience behavior on linear networks, particularly ESPN. Trian says Disney pursued streaming subscribers with an overly aggressive pricing scheme ($7 a month was too low), a point that Iger himself has already admitted. Peltz claims that recent initiatives — the $1.5-billion partnership with Epic Games; the still unnamed sports streaming joint venture with Warner Bros. Discovery and Fox Corp. — are half-baked.

But even assuming that Peltz’s analysis is accurate, how fully formed is his prescription? Trian’s 133-page document on Disney spends much ink on the company’s problems, but is short on specific remedies. The paper suggests that Disney should consider combining Hulu and Disney+ into one entity, evaluate the viability of Hulu’s live TV product and improve theatrical film performance. Which are surely ideas that the current leadership group has thought of already.

As far as succession planning goes, the Glass Lewis report gives Disney the edge over Trian’s plan. “Notwithstanding faults in Disney’s prior succession initiative, Trian’s intent to launch a new process is not clearly superior to, and may be heavily duplicative of, Disney’s ongoing effort, which is already tied to a special board committee composed of members we believe to be credible,” the report says.

Anyway, much of Peltz’s campaign seems aimed at holding Iger’s and the rest of the Disney board’s feet to the fire. For example, Trian suggested that the board “insist” on a direct-to-consumer strategy to achieve “Netflix-like” profit margins of 15% to 20% by fiscal 2027. How such a goal would be realized is not explained in great detail. “Insist” may be the key word.

Iger will most likely prevail with the board Disney wants, without Peltz, Rasulo or any of the three nominees put forth by another shareholder, Blackwells Capital. To Disney, this whole episode may seem like a nuisance, an expensive distraction. But regardless of how the boardroom skirmish turns out, Iger still has a lot to prove before we can judge his second term.
 
don't forget, Lucasfilm is headquartered in Northern CA, a completely different world from HW.
Right, and he purposefully moved up tehre to get away from the big studios.
He didn't move; George and Marcia had lived in Marin County for a long time before they did "Star Wars." One of their houses was near downtown San Rafael (although I think actually in San Anselmo; my boyfriend and I used to pretend to wave at them when we ate on the patio of a restaurant below the hill their house was on) and the other house, I think, was in Kentfield. I don't recall what production facilities they had available before Skywalker Ranch was built—they may have had to visit Southern California for business purposes—but that wasn't when George established a base in Northern California.
 
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/b...expanded-college-football-playoff-1235855854/

ESPN Inks Multibillion Six-Year Extension for Expanded College Football Playoff
ESPN chief Jimmy Pitaro unveiled the deal and talked streaming the sports bundle at an Axios event Tuesday.

March 19, 2024 - 12:08pm PDT
by Alex Weprin

In the biggest sports rights deal of 2024 so far, ESPN has snagged a six-year extension for the College Football Playoff, a critical deal (valued at a reported $7.8 billion) that will keep ESPN as the home of the playoffs through 2031-2032.

The CFP will expand this year from four teams to 12 teams, with another expansion to 16 teams possible in 2026. Also beginning in 2026, the national championship game will be broadcast on ABC, in addition to ESPN’s traditional “MegaCast.”

Notably, the deal also “includes expansive rights to simulcast or MegaCast CFP games across all Walt Disney Company platforms, including TWDC Direct-to-Consumer offerings,” per ESPN. That would presumably include ESPN’s DTC offering, as well as possibly Hulu and Disney+, should the company choose to do so.

ESPN chairman Jimmy Pitaro announced the deal at an Axios conference Tuesday.

“From my perspective, a good deal is when both sides are happy. We feel really good about the deal. And we believe that the college football playoff committee feels really good, the commissioners, everyone who was involved feels really good about it,” Pitaro told Sara Fishcer at the event. “It was a long process. They had to get a lot of their issues resolved among the conferences etc. And they did, and as soon as they did we were ready, because we’ve been working on our deal for so long we had things teed up. And so as soon as they came back to us and said we are now good, we have alignment among the conferences, among the constituents, it didn’t take us long to get our deal done and signed.”

Pitaro also addressed a number other issues at the event, including the ongoing talks with the NBA: “It is, from our perspective, an incredibly valuable asset not just to ESPN, but to the entire Walt Disney Company,” Pitaro said, noting the young audience the NBA brings in.
ADVERTISEMENT

He also discussed the streaming sports joint-venture with Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery, acknowledging that the $40-$50 per month price point being bandied about “feels right,” although they have not settled on a price point yet.
“What we hear about every single day from our sports fans, is some frustration in terms of fragmentation, discoverability,” Pitaro said. “We all know if you’re a sports fan, oftentimes you need several apps. You need several usernames and passwords. You have several charges that show up on your credit card. And so we took a step back and said is there an opportunity to work together with Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery to create an experience where it’s somewhat centralized, and you can fire up your app and have a good chunk of sports content more than than just ESPN has to offer?”

And Pitaro addressed the controversy surrounding Pat McAfee, the ESPN host who has occasionally found himself at the center of his own news cycle over comments made on his freewheeling daily show.

“We are in a battle for people’s time. It’s more competitive than it has ever been. And so we have to try new things, we have to experiment and sometimes that might make some people uncomfortable,” Pitaro said. “And I get that ,and Pat and I talked about this, we went into that relationship knowing that and understanding that, but from from my perspective… the Pat McAfee Show is a needle mover with with younger people because of the authenticity.”
 
I just stumbled across an old post of mine where we were lamenting the new lows DIS was hitting in Sep. 2023. This was about two months before Peltz launched his latest battle, apparently I had almost called his next move...

1710944558074.png

Anyway, take a look at how DIS has fared since - DIS is doubling the S&P and it's not even a fair comparison with the other old media companies. Unfortunately, i have more than enough tied up in this one stock so I really never consider adding more, but wow, this was some buying opportunity.


1710944761018.png


Just a little positivity for our Wednesday!
 
I just stumbled across an old post of mine where we were lamenting the new lows DIS was hitting in Sep. 2023. This was about two months before Peltz launched his latest battle, apparently I had almost called his next move...

View attachment 843472

Anyway, take a look at how DIS has fared since - DIS is doubling the S&P and it's not even a fair comparison with the other old media companies. Unfortunately, i have more than enough tied up in this one stock so I really never consider adding more, but wow, this was some buying opportunity.


View attachment 843483


Just a little positivity for our Wednesday!
Which also shows what is the value of pure movie/linear TV/streaming assets are these days. PARA has Paramount Pictures, CBS, Showtime, etc.; while WBD has Warner Entertainment, HBO, TNT, CNN, etc. They both have insignificant holdings of parks and no cruises at all.
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top