hayanyujah847
It looks like a ton of fun!
- Joined
- May 9, 2007
You can, to an extent.
If they know there's a potential threat of harm, they need to disclose it.
Just like how a store will put out a wet floor sign at the entrance when it's raining.
Should be common sense that the floor will be wet from people coming inside from the rain, however, the store is aware of the potential safety hazard, and they warn the public.
I disagree. Again, you are outdoors, not indoors in a highly controlled environment. If they have to warn of any type of harm that may happen outdoors in Florida, the list would be extensive. Gators, snakes, lightening, hail, cougars, amoebas, traffic accidents, and on and on.
They are just saying on CNN that studies show that people don't read most of the information they are given. Signs included.
They are just saying on CNN that studies show that people don't read most of the information they are given. Signs included.
And now we know a village is missing a certain someone. Please, for the love of Mickey, crawl back into that bubble before something gets you. If you think that is needed, how about at your house? Do you have signage all around your house to not touch that live electrical wire or do you know that it wouldn't be a good idea? How about a sign on all of your knives? Do you warn guests of how sharp they are? Where is your signage? See where I'm going with this? Blaming Disney is not the answer.
One happened on property the other didnt. So yeah I expect disney to say something to show the child and a family were not just income.What would you expect Disney to do? Disney had complete media silence after the shootings. I expect nothing different for this.
I got chills as soon as I read your post. So terrible for everyone involved and I can't imagine being there with this going on. Orlando has such a terrible week with nothing but tragedy.We've been watching out our window at the Poly trying to figure out what is going on. Heartbreaking.
I'm not expecting anything on their social media. A spokesperson gave a statement last night. I expect another one soon.I actually thought their comment was imma
One happened on property the other didnt. So yeah I expect disney to say something to show the child and a family were not just income.
It involved a CM though. They were silent and I dont Expect much different now.
That is a totally different situationIt involved a CM though. They were silent and I dont Expect much different now.
So a lifeguard at the beach spots a shark, he does nothing? Thinks, well, these people are outside, in the ocean, where sharks live, I'm sure they understand that they can be bit? No. You blow the whistle and get people out of there.
You are Disney and pulling numerous gators out of the lagoon. You know kids play on the beach on the lagoon. You make sure parents know about how many gators you are pulling out of there. You give them the information. I know I would. I can't imagine that you wouldn't. Perhaps that's the case.
I was not disagreeing with you, didnt mean for it to come off that way. I have actually agreed with what you have said on the thread. I think we have a similar view point that people are missing. No one is mad at the alligator.If you read what i was replying to, you would see i was replying to a hypothetical question of what the response would be if there HAD been signs. Im well aware there are none. Im one of the ones saying there should be.
I disagree. Again, you are outdoors, not indoors in a highly controlled environment. If they have to warn of any type of harm that may happen outdoors in Florida, the list would be extensive. Gators, snakes, lightening, hail, cougars, amoebas, traffic accidents, and on and on.
They are just saying on CNN that studies show that people don't read most of the information they are given. Signs included.
And that would likely be the case here as well...
This myth that people don't tune these out...and inhibitions are not LOWER at WDW than in nearly all other places...is just wrong.
An alligator sign likely wouldn't prevent this.
No...Disney would not do this. They aren't anti safety...but they are very much pro asthestics...which is ultimately pro business.
And the difference between a lifeguard at the beach and here is that you EXPECT people to be in the water at the beach.
Disney doesn't have roving lifeguard patrols for posted no swimming areas...and they Never will...
Why? The business...they wouldn't tolerate the cost for a second.
And that would likely be the case here as well...
This myth that people don't tune these out...and inhibitions are not LOWER at WDW than in nearly all other places...is just wrong.
An alligator sign likely wouldn't prevent this.