Disney Dreams
Proudly afflicted with TDMA!
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2006
Not really worried about lead at Disneyland, but I am surprised that Disney hasn't protected themselves against this claim. Posting a few signs would probably take care of their liability and Disney has one of the best legal departments on the planet. So I am guessing they have their own lead analysis which shows lower exposure or they have some other protection.
I have seen the signs mentioned in the article about mercury levels in fish. So it is kinda weird they have that sign (which as far as I know is not required) and not the Prop 65 warning sign.
Should be interesting to see how it plays out.
The signs are there.
From an article I located in a quick Google search: "They rejected the allegations, saying Disneyland has posted signs, as required by law, warning people about all lead-tainted fixtures and figurines. "We believe that Disneyland Resort is in full compliance with the signage requirements," Disney spokeswoman Suzi Brown tells the Los Angeles Times. But Mateel wants the court to force the park to make the signs more prominent, or to cover up tainted fixtures."
This made is laugh. Thanks. So true. Daily risk for those in So. Cal.... Getting there is far more hazardous to my health. I5 can be scary.
- Dreams