3 MEN AND A BOAT
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
What’s the point of a regulation requiring that an object be loud. It is possible to go through a waiting period of 6 months to a year, several hundred dollar stamp, a visit with the local law enforcement, all to simply muffle it a few decibels, and that’s just for 1 suppressor, if I want another for a different caliber firearm I have to go through all of that process again. Suppressors do not make a gun silent like in the movies, it simply gets it to a level less likely to damage a persons hearing, similar to a muffler on a car or motorcycle which can be obtained with no tax stamp or waiting period(since people like to compare guns to cars). Seems more like a punishment on law abiding citizens than anything else.Why shouldn’t they be?
Suppressors would be ideal for hunting as it would muffle the sound from high powered rifles to a level less disturbing to both the hunter and others within the area. For self defense larger magazines are very desirable, if several armed intruders come into my home I feel better defending my family with 30 rounds already loaded without trying to grab extra mags while carrying a firearm, possibly a flashlight, all the while trying to herd my children into a safe direction.I agree that they can be used for hunting and sport, but disagree that people would need automatic rifles, silencers or high capacity mags for these purposes. Nor would mandatory waiting periods or increased background checks, required training/licence unduly effect those that want guns for these purposes.
As far as self denfense, the risk is greater than the reward, you are significantly more likely to end up I hired or killed by it, then use it to protect yourself.