one more RVA resale deed was added today, it's one of
the group of 75 point deeds that were all listed at the same time by the same owner ...
also, I noticed
an error I made a whoopsie in the data; the first resale deed was bought by a flipper and resold immediately, fine no problem there; but there was a second resale deed that was bought and resold that I didn't catch before, the 110 point one bought on 18 Mar 2020 is the same deed as the one sold on 25 Sep 2020; not sure how I missed that before but here we are ...
net result still only 13 deeds have been set free via resale with two of those recycled once each (
reduce, reuse, recycle ♻)
recording date | # | points | USD per point | notes |
---|
7 Aug 2019 | 1a | 175 | 100 | bought by flipper |
30 Oct 2019 | 1b | 175 | 140 | sold by flipper |
18 Mar 2020 | 2a | 110 | 139.1 | resold on 25 Sep 2020 |
8 May 2020 | 3 | 412 | 109.2 | |
2 Jun 2020 | 4 | 100 | 135 | |
3 Jun 2020 | 5 | 125 | 144 | |
11 Aug 2020 | 6 | 130 | 135.4 | |
27 Aug 2020 | 7 | 175 | 133.1 | |
1 Sep 2020 | 8 | 190 | 130 | |
17 Sep 2020 | 9 | 195 | 120 | |
25 Sep 2020 | 2b | 110 | 150 | second reselling (initial 18 Mar 2020) |
8 Oct 2020 | 10 | 100 | 125 | |
9 Oct 2020 | 11 | 100 | 140 | |
15 Oct 2020 | 12 | 50 | 160 | |
23 Nov 2020 | 13 | 75 | 137.3 | one of seven 75 point deeds by the same owner |
the coefficient of determination (R²) worsened slightly because the 75 point deed was just below the trendline; note: coefficient of determination (R²) ranges from 0 to 1 (at least the way I'm using it) and a higher value indicates the linear regression fits the data better; as before, with the additional data points, the outlier sale to the timeshare flipper has less of an effect (the two best-fit lines are converging) ...
View attachment 540058