TheMaxRebo
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
Apparently Apple doesn’t like Wookies.
Com’on Apple ... let the Wookie win!
Apparently Apple doesn’t like Wookies.
Apparently Apple doesn’t like Wookies.
As a SW movie, this one is not doing well, but let's not get crazy. This is far from a box office flop with over $268MM in global sales in the first 10 days. It is also the 7th highest grossing film in history for films released on Memorial Day weekend - a weekend that historically does not have great box office sales.
It probably will not be a $500MM film, but it doesn't have to be in order to keep the SW ball rolling forward. Disney is very highly invested in the SW franchise, and their parks and hotels themed toward this franchise are not even open yet. They are going to keep making these films. And SW fans the world over are going to keep paying to see them.
This post is filled with hyperbole. And the bolded is patently absurd. It is not a tent pole film. It does not support the SW franchise. It was a sidebar film at most.With the $250M+ production budget it has (with Deadline reporting $300M+), it is looking at a minimum $100M+ theatrical loss (the higher end of the budget could mean a $200M theatrical loss) - it is literally one of the biggest tentpole bombs of the last few years, if not the last few decades. Its catastrophic reception at the box office is hard to understate. It may not make $400M WW at the box office. There is no amount of toys/merchandise that can pick it up...especially since merchandise related to a bomb doesn't sell, so it becomes a catastrophic double whammy...
This post is filled with hyperbole. And the bolded is patently absurd. It is not a tent pole film. It does not support the SW franchise. It was a sidebar film at most.
ETA - and it only cost $250MM because the original directors messed it up and they had to start over almost from scratch.
It changes everything. The timing of the release, the bad press leading up to it and the cost over-runs all lead to one thing - this film will not be as profitable as it would have been if it had just undergone a normal development cycle and a Christmas release. It would have cost much less to make and would have made much more at the box office.It doesn't matter WHY it cost $250M+ - it doesn't change the fact that it did....
I do think they have to consider Kathleen Kennedy’s role though. The fact is their two standalones have both had production issues. One turned out well at the box office, the other not so much. You have to question her ability to assign directors and stick with themIt changes everything. The timing of the release, the bad press leading up to it and the cost over-runs all lead to one thing - this film will not be as profitable as it would have been if it had just undergone a normal development cycle and a Christmas release. It would have cost much less to make and would have made much more at the box office.
The is not a "catastrophe". This is just a train wreck of bad circumstances that produced sub-optimal results. Lucas Films will learn from all of this. No one there is going to jump off a cliff.
Maybe Chewbacca can have a Scottish accent like Sean Connery did in red October even though he was Russian.Well they could do the Hunt for Red October trick were they start talking Russian then zoom in on the lips and the magically speak English. However if I heard a Wookie speak English in a Star Wars movie I might just ask for a refund.
I do think they have to consider Kathleen Kennedy’s role though. The fact is their two standalones have both had production issues. One turned out well at the box office, the other not so much. You have to question her ability to assign directors and stick with them
It changes everything. The timing of the release, the bad press leading up to it and the cost over-runs all lead to one thing - this film will not be as profitable as it would have been if it had just undergone a normal development cycle and a Christmas release. It would have cost much less to make and would have made much more at the box office.
The is not a "catastrophe". This is just a train wreck of bad circumstances that produced sub-optimal results. Lucas Films will learn from all of this. No one there is going to jump off a cliff.
Yeah, but she's put a decent amount of money in Disney's coffers, and R1 is generally held to be in most peoples top three SW movies. I doubt they're in that much of a hurry to throw her under the bus.
SW is not Marvel. As long as Iger understands that, Kennedy should be safe.
Obviously what matters more is Disney's own internal projections. Click-baity websites running numbers that point to a 'catastrophe' are meaningless. Disney though know the business and should've had a good idea what this movie would realistically do at the box office. If it falls short of that, they're not going to be happy.
Personally I thought rogue one was a bit of mess up until the last half hour. Then we got an incredible battle followed by Darth Vader kicking butt.
I agree (even though I'm not in the Kathleen Kennedy fan club) - one thing I read was very clear on that: for about $1 billion in production budgets, she's made 4 movies that have made a total of about $5 billion. Love her or hate her, most businesses don't kick someone out the door on a 5x return on investment that nets them a cool $4 billion.Yeah, but she's put a decent amount of money in Disney's coffers, and R1 is generally held to be in most peoples top three SW movies. I doubt they're in that much of a hurry to throw her under the bus.
Darth Maul was brought back to life in the animated TV series. I forgot which series it was.Does anyone know the timeline of this film? I assumed it took place before Episode I due to the scene with Darth Maul but then remembered that the Empire was in control of the galaxy during the film. I believe Darth Maul was cut in half near the end of Episode I.