TheMaxRebo
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
Yeah - I think that's a real problem with what IX has to do - it almost has to be a beginning as well as a conclusion. Tough road to hoe.
It's the real problem of a franchise like this...things can't ever "conclude". Return of the Jedi tied the whole thing up in a nice bow. The Emperor is defeated, the rebel alliance wins, everyone celebrates. Are we allowed to even have that now? They have to just keep on fighting to justify the next movie. It's the biggest problem with the Marvel movies, you can't just have a happy ending, the ending of the movie has to practically set up the next movie...
As far as the Jedi vs Sith though - I'm good with getting rid of them. What the hell are the Sith anyways? It's always a master and apprentice, but no idea where they come from or how a new one comes along? It's all really dumb. A Lucas dumped on the Jedi so hard in the prequels - they're all a bunch of morons. If the prequels didn't exist I probably would want more of them, but those prequels just made the Jedi so worthless - like they deserve to lose.
The history of the Sith is pretty interesting and looking back at some of the really powerful ones. Basically they are "Fallen Jedi" who didn't believe the principles of the Jedi were right and rather passion and emoiton should be followed. There was a giant galactic civil war within the Jedi that led to the schism and ultimately the rise of the Sith. The Rule of Two (the master and apprentice) was started by Darth Bane (why it is also known as the Banite system) and was founded because there were a ton of Sith Lords but there was a ton of infighting and they couldn't conquer as much as they wanted due to it, so they got rid of all of that by the doctrine that there can be only two and each knew their place.