It’s not like they can’t take a risk here or there tho. I don’t mind IP when it works and works well. Original stories also work too though and for ever 5-10 IP based things 1-2 original things would be nice.
Is anything else at Epcot (besides the two rides and Harmonious) being worked on construction wise? All the tear-downs, are they working on anything going up in it's place or is it all sitting dormant right now?
The Moana water feature?
Can Disney even do something with BP? I remember there being some unknown about who's all included in the deal with Universal
Can Disney even do something with BP? I remember there being some unknown about who's all included in the deal with Universal
Which is part of why I said I can see them doing it.TBF when has that mattered regarding SW content in the parks? The random scenes from Star Tours take you into scenes from all 9 films - you fly from a battle on Naboo in Ep1 to the trench run in Ep4 on the same "trip" (or one of the timeline-tossing variants described here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Tours_–_The_Adventures_Continue#Ride_experience )
Pandora is Beastly Kingdom. Joe Rohde in his interview with OC Register basically said that.If nothing else, do it outside of the parks. There’s 100% still a market for an Adventurers Club. You don’t need Pleasure Island to have it. In the parks, Epcot and AK should have more original attractions. But what do you do in AK that blends with the idea with the park that doesn’t fall flat like Kali River? Dinoland absolutely needs to go. I love Dinosaur, but that area is in BAD shape. I was embarrassed for Disney walking through there in August. Would a scaled down version of Beastly Kingdom work?
Cosmic Rewind really doesn’t work without the IP attached, and they probably didn’t have room in Tomorrowland/DHS for that massive building. I get MK and DHS going full IP. Tron I believe should have abandoned the IP in MK. It’s such a niche property that doesn’t have a wide fan base that it could have easily been tweaked to an original story while keeping the exact same attraction layout
Well, personally I don't think Black Panther or Zootopia fit in Animal Kingdom very well. I see AK much more about habitats and conservation - Black Panther is more about that culture and developing technology, etc. (unless they spin it how technology can fit in the natural world without negatively impacting it). Zootopia is anthropomorphic animals living in a human style world, so sort of the exact opposite of what Animal Kingdom is
As for IP, I don't mind using it where it makes sense. I am not a fan of shoehorning it where it doesn't fit well, and also would appreciate some new rides base on new ideas - and then you can go the other way and make shows about the characters developed for the attractions. I think if there was even one or two non-IP attractions in development it would help balance things. Just feels like it has swung too far to IP and only IP not matter what
I can talk for an hour about this one with you and @rteetz but my opinion briefly is this:
Dinoland is far from your definition of Habitat and Conservation as you can get and we're not even considering the original Beastly Kingdoms that was planned with unicorns, dragons, and scorched knights. So I think Zooptopia can fit in nicely if you can fly through the air of Pandora and time travel to dinosaur times.
Animal Kingdom is about a lot of things in my opinion, Habitat and Conservation is totally part of that, but it's also about celebrating the world and it's myths and stories that have to do with Animals - real or imagined.
Dinoland was meant to be temporary or at least not what it became due to money. I feel Dinosaur the ride does fit the vision but the surround land does not. They can and should keep the prehistoric aspect IMO.I can talk for an hour about this one with you and @rteetz but my opinion briefly is this:
Dinoland is far from your definition of Habitat and Conservation as you can get and we're not even considering the original Beastly Kingdoms that was planned with unicorns, dragons, and scorched knights. So I think Zooptopia can fit in nicely if you can fly through the air of Pandora and time travel to dinosaur times.
Animal Kingdom is about a lot of things in my opinion, Habitat and Conservation is totally part of that, but it's also about celebrating the world and it's myths and stories that have to do with Animals - real or imagined.
I can talk for an hour about this one with you and @rteetz but my opinion briefly is this:
Dinoland is far from your definition of Habitat and Conservation as you can get and we're not even considering the original Beastly Kingdoms that was planned with unicorns, dragons, and scorched knights. So I think Zooptopia can fit in nicely if you can fly through the air of Pandora and time travel to dinosaur times.
Animal Kingdom is about a lot of things in my opinion, Habitat and Conservation is totally part of that, but it's also about celebrating the world and it's myths and stories that have to do with Animals - real or imagined.
Pandora is Beastly Kingdom. Joe Rohde in his interview with OC Register basically said that.
This is WDW, you have the blessing of size. Guardians could have went wherever they wanted.
I’m not saying take a coming attraction and make it original. That’s not how this works. You take an original story and build the attraction around that. Haunted Mansion was originally supposed to be a walk through.
right, but myths and stories about where creatures (real or imagined) where actually set ... not them living in cities and acting like humans.
Zootopia is a story about animals living in cities.
Dragons are about flying/fire breathing animals living in caves on mountains of gold.
I mean I don't really see a difference. It's all story time.
but it is about Dragons acting like dragons
Zootopia isn't animals acting like animals
I don't see how you don't see the difference
... but just talking in circles now I suppose
Think of Beastly Kingdom like Pandora. The animals are fictional, but they're still animals, and presented in their "natural" habitat. Anthropomorphic animals walking around a human-like city dressing and acting like people is more than a bit different.Zootopia is a story about animals living in cities.
Dragons are about flying/fire breathing animals living in caves on mountains of gold.
I mean I don't really see a difference. It's all story time.
There are several very large expansions pads.I’m not sure what’s usable in the land surrounding the park in terms of what’s marshland and able to be built upon, but there’s a lot of untouched land behind the park as you can see from the top of Everest, but all we hear about is the expansion pad by Pandora.
No and I don’t think anyone wants that. However AK has a very specific overarching message that even Pandora stick too.I agree. If you want strictly a Zoo, it's already too late for AK.
You’re 100% correct thobut it is about Dragons acting like dragons
Zootopia isn't animals acting like animals
I don't see how you don't see the difference
... but just talking in circles now I suppose