We disagree on this then. I may still be able to see the fireworks, but now you've taken a great spot away from me, unless I want to pay more. I've already paid $3500-$4000 for a 7 day trip.............................................................................................
No one took a great spot from you because honestly no spot, anywhere, is anyone's but Disney's. You have a great shot at getting the best spot "available" and just because it's not the spot you want doesn't mean they took anything from you. Offering special viewing areas is nothing new for Disney, Fantasmic package has been around a long time, I think I booked it a decade ago. They save prime seating for the package holders who paid extra for that seat. Rivers of Light will be the same model. Nothing new. Nothing unexpected. Plenty of good viewing available.
If you feel you are paying too much for your Disney trip due to not getting your monies worth, then why go? It's a luxury optional vacation for everyone and if a vacation does not fulfill your expectations then it wasn't really a vacation was it? I know I won't go back to some places because I did not get MY monies worth.
The park hours are park hours, aka normal operating hours. Fall hours have basically been the same for 10+ years. Disney posts hours 6 months in advance. Those are the minimal park hours. Guests booking trips can decide if that works for them or not. If someone spent thousands of dollars to go to a THEME PARK and did not check PARK HOURS in advance, then they are foolish and I don't feel sorry for them at all. I don't even drive to a local store that isn't one of my regulars without checking hours before I waste my time. If they really don't know then they didn't book ADRs and they didn't book FP+ and they really aren't worried about "getting their monies worth." Zero sympathy.
Repeat customer ............. do you really think with all these changes that the repeat is Disney's demographic market. It's not. If it were there would be many more offerings for the repeat, for the AP etc. Their demographic right now is the family doing the big huge blow out - once in a lifetime trip - that will drop a bucket load of money. Then they want the next guest to be the same. They make way more money from them and they don't have to listen to their complaints of how
it used to be.
Package: hotel, food, tickets. That is what they got. Add-ons are completely optional and not needed for a great trip. It's like going on a cruise: cabin, dining, shows, pools. But if I want to do anything good at the ports a HUGE add-on, if I want a drink a HUGE charge ......... the tourism business thrives on add-ons. This is not a surprise to someone spending that much on a vacation. And the plus is they are optional.
You know why Disney added all these add-ons, hard tickets, need for ADRs, FP+ .............. because the attendance is way up from years ago. I have been going since 1971. I've been through all the ripples. I loved the first decade of this century, the recession, because it meant that Disney World was not on most folks table. Ten years of low crowds. I kicked it off with $130 a night at the Cabins, we'll never see that price again. It meant I never had long lines. It meant I could walk up to restaurants and be seated. It meant Halloween parties with half the number of folks now. Did Disney like the recession years? No, it hurt. And we as guests can't hold on to the glory years of when it was "fun" due to the low crowds. With an improved economy, folks started flooding back, Disney is trying to catch up construction wise, they are testing/offering all kinds of events because there is a demand for it. Folks want the option to pay more for smaller crowds, guaranteed seats/view, basically FP+. Disney is offering what guests are demanding. Doesn't make it wrong, it's a business move. Again, if it has changed your value, don't go or reduce to every 5 years as you say. For me, I pick what I want and pass on others. What works for me may not work for others, and visa versa .... but that doesn't make any of it wrong at all. Just like EMH is your main draw for onsite, it isn't for most.
I disagree with this comment. The virtual no money is not true at all. Those EMH are a main selling point and why many people stay onsite. The EMH and the transportation to the parks are exactly why my family pays the higher cost to stay onsite vs offsite.
Completely disagree and many on DIS have said the same thing. Folks stay on property more for:
- Bubble
- Location to parks and convenience of transportation, particularly those who fly aka ME.
- Some the ability to get
DDP
-
And in recent years big plus is 60 day FP+
It may be a huge perk for you and it is for me, but honestly if it were a main selling point then the parks would be at capacity with guests during EMH. The numbers of guests at EMH alone debunks this theory.