W
WebmasterAlex
Guest
I think it would all help us out if you could explain, happygirl, just what Mike McQueary did that, in your eyes, makes him a whistle blower?
He testified in front of the Grand Jury and because of that a lot of the media is calling him a "whistle blower" and saying he filed a "whistle blower lawsuit"
Obviously one can argue whether or not that makes him a whistleblower but everyone else lied
I think a lot of people are letting the fact that he witnessed a rape and did NOTHING, an absolutely disgusting act color their view of the entire situation. There are a lot of sub plots here. Is there a possiblity he was punished by the school for telling the truth on the stand? Sure but he'll have to prove it.
Here's a quote from a reporter covering the trial:
"And at the Sandusky trial, he never overstated what he witnessed. The jury found McQueary so believable they convicted Sandusky of four of the five charged counts, specifically, following McQuearys testimony. It was his word that even led to the acquitted charge, which wouldve required proof of actual penetration, something McQueary repeatedly said he didnt see
No, Mike McQueary didnt do enough to stop Jerry Sandusky. No, he didnt scream loud enough about what he saw. What he did though was more than any other person at Penn State did for a long time. While McQueary ranks extremely low on the list of victims of the Sandusky case, he was affected.
Hes out of work. Hes out of money. Hes out of his career. Hes out of Penn States support system even as the school pays for the defense of Curley and Schultz.
He alleges, in his whistleblower suit, that Spaniers publicly and privately stated unconditional support for Curley and Schultz essentially branded McQueary a liar and ruined him. It claims his employer picked sides and killed his career and reputation. All he's ever done, he said, was tell the truth. And now he's paying for it. "