Recent polls about "Millenials"

I work for a large Energy Company (Oil Company). I am 58 years old and work with millenials. I had one sitting next to me for a while and we used to have long discussions about the differences in generations and he really made sense and helped me understand a few things. Fist let me say he was not typical of his generation. He was smart, Jewish, Politically involved and would fly from Houston to DC and other areas to work on the presidential campaigns in 2016. He was well connected not necessarily through family but by his own efforts. When I might complain about his generation from time to time, he would not get upset but rather explain the why's as he saw it that they acted the way they did. First was the fact that many of his generation did not want to work for corporate America simply because all their lives they have been given a seat at the table when it came to making decsions. They could not deal with corporate settings because it was too hierachical. They don't want to be told what to do, they want to be a part of the discussion and have a say in things. Secondly money was not as important to many of them, quality of work and quality of life and life experiences were in many instances much more important. He has worked on politics, run with the bulls in Pamplona and toured Holicost Sites in Germany in his 26 years. The classic education experience is not and never has been important to their generation. By classical I mean an education in the Arts, Science, and History. They want to study what they want to study and not have their education dictated to them by someone else. That means they might not be aware of certain historical things because at the end of the day it is just not important to them. They are not dumb, they are not lazy, they just don't like established structure.

I have to pause at this point and say like any description of a group of people, this is not the singular definitive description of the generation but rather a wide ranging description of the larger group and there will be countless exceptions to these observations.

They tend to not trust a lot of things because to an extent they feel the prior generations have screwed things up a little and forced standardized testing on them, media that cannot be trusted and a global situation that is less than perfect. They tend to be more liberal in their thinking (although my co worker is actually staunchly conservative) and see more of a global citizenship than a more nationalistic view of things. They have not suffered many bad things in their lives therefore they have a more upbeat view of things (ah youth!). They want everyone to be taken care of and with some exceptions hate corporate America (except, Facebook, Google, Amazon, and any free wheeling tech type company because that's where a lot of them want to work) They value freedom and lot's of vacation more that money.

So while any interviewer can walk on the street and ask questions that are commonplace for our generation but millenials will stumble all over, it does not mean for one second they are stupid. They are quite bright but those things don't interest them and in the internet/information age we live in they cannot keep up with it all but rather only focus on that which interests them.

And finally as another poster commented, they are a function of the generation that raised them so don't be too critical on yourself.

To the bolded (bolding mine), what????? You remember the great recession correct? I am so thankful that I am an older millennial and I graduated and already had a great job prior to the recession (so did my husband). I cannot even imagine what others of my generation went through being recent graduates into the workforce at the height of the recession.

Here is just one article that discusses the divide in earning potential: http://www.businessinsider.com/grea...g-cap-on-millennials-earning-potential-2017-7

As per usual, so many bizarre generalizations in this thread regarding millennials, these generational wars are nothing new though, as any history book will tell you.
 
Last edited:
Another Millennial here- I find both polls extremely hard to believe. As somebody mentioned, 1,350 is not a big sample size, particularly when you realize not all of them were Millennials and they did it via landline. Not a single one of my friends has a land line, so I imagine that poll may have been skewed with Millennials being underrepresented so having fewer to base conclusions on.

I know this is anecdotal, but not a single one of my friends is ignorant about the Holocaust. Sure, there may be some that couldn't quote an exact number killed, but they know what it is and they have all heard of Auschwitz. I also do not know a single person, Millennial or otherwise, who believes the Earth is flat. The thing with polls, they can be easily worded in such a way as to get the results you want. I can also see a lot of people answering "yes" to the Flat Earther poll to be sarcastic or funny.

I get really sick and tired of people bashing my generation. Just as I get really sick and tired of my generation bashing the older generations. It's just stupid. No, our generations will not always see eye to eye or do things in the same way, but that is not a bad thing.
 
Another Millennial here- I find both polls extremely hard to believe. As somebody mentioned, 1,350 is not a big sample size, particularly when you realize not all of them were Millennials and they did it via landline. Not a single one of my friends has a land line, so I imagine that poll may have been skewed with Millennials being underrepresented so having fewer to base conclusions on.

I know this is anecdotal, but not a single one of my friends is ignorant about the Holocaust. Sure, there may be some that couldn't quote an exact number killed, but they know what it is and they have all heard of Auschwitz. I also do not know a single person, Millennial or otherwise, who believes the Earth is flat. The thing with polls, they can be easily worded in such a way as to get the results you want. I can also see a lot of people answering "yes" to the Flat Earther poll to be sarcastic or funny.

I get really sick and tired of people bashing my generation. Just as I get really sick and tired of my generation bashing the older generations. It's just stupid. No, our generations will not always see eye to eye or do things in the same way, but that is not a bad thing.

I showed this thread to 8 under 30's at work yesterday. The landline portion did stick out like a sore thumb. But none of that unscientifically selected 8 disputed anything else and felt it was fair description of their generation. As one put it "we earned that reputation"
 
Last edited:
Another Millennial here- I find both polls extremely hard to believe. As somebody mentioned, 1,350 is not a big sample size, particularly when you realize not all of them were Millennials and they did it via landline. Not a single one of my friends has a land line, so I imagine that poll may have been skewed with Millennials being underrepresented so having fewer to base conclusions on.

I know this is anecdotal, but not a single one of my friends is ignorant about the Holocaust. Sure, there may be some that couldn't quote an exact number killed, but they know what it is and they have all heard of Auschwitz. I also do not know a single person, Millennial or otherwise, who believes the Earth is flat. The thing with polls, they can be easily worded in such a way as to get the results you want. I can also see a lot of people answering "yes" to the Flat Earther poll to be sarcastic or funny.

I get really sick and tired of people bashing my generation. Just as I get really sick and tired of my generation bashing the older generations. It's just stupid. No, our generations will not always see eye to eye or do things in the same way, but that is not a bad thing.

You know, it might be worth your time to google Tom Petty’s song “Rhino Skin”. Having said that, I suspect it seems worse because of social media. Sometimes you just have to tune stuff out. Take what you will from criticism and make things better for future generations.
 
1*GyX-7iI6n686R6Tp9UHzWw.png
 
Yes people generalize about groups, generational or otherwise, but I freely admitted my comments were not to be interpreted for all. The things I posted were opinions of the millennial that sat next to me. Yes there was a recession, lived through a few. I graduated college in 1981 and got a job in the energy sector and three years later lived through that recession. Saw my wife laid off from energy and watched the value of my newly purchased home tumble. I have no issues with millennial's and I at least thought defended them somewhat with my post. As to history and if anyone at any age is aware of it, my opinion is no, most don't regardless of age. Of course that is a personal bias because I am almost finished with my Masters in History.
 
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/05/01/misbehaving-children-in-ancient-times/

Misbehaving Children in Ancient Times


Dear Quote Investigator: There is a great quote by Plato or Socrates about the misbehavior of children in antiquity that I read in the New York Times. The quote shows that the problems between generations are not just a recent occurrence. Instead, the conflicts between parents and offspring are timeless [NY8]:

The children now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise.

I wanted to use this quote, so I needed to know who said it; however, the NYT website contained a surprise. The newspaper had retracted the quote and now there was a note that said “Its origin is unclear, although many researchers agree that Plato is not the source.” I am sure I have seen this quote before. Can you tell me where it came from and who said it?

Quote Investigator: The quote is so entertaining and it fills its niche so well that it is cited repeatedly around the globe. Over the decades the quotation or a close variant has appeared in newspapers such as: Oakland Tribune of California in 1922; The Bee of Danville, Virginia in 1946; Winnipeg Free Press of Manitoba, Canada in 1976; The Sunday Herald of Chicago, Illinois in 1982; the Sun-Herald of Sydney, Australia in 2005; and the Taipei Times of Taiwan in 2008 [SOC1-SOC6]. The words are usually attributed to Socrates and the confusion with Plato is understandable because Plato’s dialogues are the primary source of knowledge concerning Socrates.

QI has determined that the author of the quote is not someone famous or ancient.


It was crafted by a student, Kenneth John Freeman, for his Cambridge dissertation published in 1907. Freeman did not claim that the passage under analysis was a direct quotation of anyone; instead, he was presenting his own summary of the complaints directed against young people in ancient times. The words he used were later slightly altered to yield the modern version. In fact, more than one section of his thesis has been excerpted and then attributed classical luminaries. Here is the original text [CAMB]:

The counts of the indictment are luxury, bad manners, contempt for authority, disrespect to elders, and a love for chatter in place of exercise. …

Children began to be the tyrants, not the slaves, of their households. They no longer rose from their seats when an elder entered the room; they contradicted their parents, chattered before company, gobbled up the dainties at table, and committed various offences against Hellenic tastes, such as crossing their legs. They tyrannised over the paidagogoi and schoolmasters.

Not everyone misquoted and misattributed the work of Kenneth John Freeman. In an essay published in 1912 an educator named James J. Walsh of Fordham University properly credited Freeman and did not modify his text. Walsh used the excerpts in an address to fellow educators at the Schoolmasters’ Club of New York in 1911 [WAL].

In 1921 Munsey’s magazine reprinted a passage from Walsh’s essay and gave him credit. However, all of the excerpted text was actually from Freeman’s original work. The quotation in Munsey’s excised a section of Freeman’s text and combined two passages to create one [MUN]. In 1922 Freeman’s words were firmly reattached to Socrates in the Oakland Tribune [SOC1].

In the 1960s the publisher Malcolm Forbes attempted to determine the true origin of the quotation, but the investigation of his magazine was unsuccessful as discussed in the reference Respectfully Quoted. Now thanks to the Google Books archive the mystery is solved.

[NY8] 2008 January 17, New York Times, Generation Me vs. You Revisited by Stephanie Rosenbloom, New York, New York. link

[SOC1] 1922 May 24, Oakland Tribune, Page 8, Column 2, Oakland, California. (NewspaperArchive)

[SOC2] 1946 May 28, The Bee, The Beehive, Page 6, Column 3, Danville, Virginia. (NewspaperArchive)

[SOC3] 1976 March 26, Winnipeg Free Press, “There’s no returning to ‘the good old days’; education is an art as much as a science”, Page 34, Column 2, Winnipeg, Manitoba. (NewspaperArchive)

[SOC4] 1982 May 23, The Sunday Herald (Daily Herald), Curiosity, Section 5, Page 4, Chicago, Illinois. (NewspaperArchive)

[SOC5] 2005 August 21, The Sun-Herald, “Kids have always behaved badly, it’s the parents who’ve changed” by Miranda Devinen Sydney, Australia. link

[SOC6] 2008 January 20, Taipei Times, Face to face with Generation Me by Stephanie Rosenbloom (Reprint of NYT article), Taiwan.

[CAMB] 1908, “Schools of Hellas: an Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 BC” by Kenneth John Freeman, (First impression 1907), page 74, Macmillan and Co., London. (Google Books full view, Internet Archive) googlelink01 googlelink02archivelink

[WAL] 1912, Modern Progress and History: Addresses on Various Academic Occasions, by James J. Walsh, Problems Old and New in Education (Address given to Schoolmasters’ Club of New York and vicinity on April 8, 1911), Page 35, Fordham University press. (Google Books full view) link

[MUN] 1921 May, Munsey’s Magazine, The Strife of Age and Youth by Richard Le Gallienne, Page 640, Volume LXXII, Number 4, The Frank A. Munsey Co. (Google Books full view) link

This entry was posted in Plato, Socrates and tagged Children, Plato, Socrates on May 1, 2010.
 
I can only speak for my own children but my son in middle school is learning about the Holocaust as we speak (8th grade) my 11th grader is taking a whole class specifically about the Holocaust...neither of them think the earth is flat. Technically neither are millennials either but...
 
I am genuinely befuddled when people have such a negative view of millennials in the work place. We've hired three in the last year, and all three have been absolutely fantastic. They are hard working, inquisitive, and have way more initiative than many of my older employees. They're happy to learn just about anything I throw at them. Sure, it takes them longer to learn something than someone who's been at work a decade, but that's a function of their experience and education at this point in their lives, not a function of their generation.
These kids are well spoken, willing to work with anyone, know how to research things they don't already know, not afraid to speak up in a meeting or ask insightful (and sometimes not so insightful questions). They are a huge asset to our team.
And from what I can tell, we didn't manage to find some rare-out-of-the-norm millennials.
I have no doubt there are some millennials who are complete idiots, who feel entitled to everything, and who make their coworkers miserable - just as there are idiotic, entitled, miserable employees in every generation.
 
Everything wrong with the current generation is a product of the previous generation. Food for thought.

But being in retail, I have found that the newest generation, the kids I deal with daily are being more respectful than ever. It’s amazing how much can change in a few years.

Not totally true...

I am a Gen X-er (1976) and had my first child in 2000.

I won't have contributed to the downfall of society until at least the kids born in the 2000's get their "generational name'! I claim no responsibility to the raising of the generation that followed me - those crazy Millennials! :rotfl2:

And you think we have problems now? Just brace yourself....despite my best efforts, my nearly 18-year old is going off into the world in less than 4 months unable to even make himself a sandwich. :rotfl:It's the same story all around here....all of us parents are wondering where we went wrong with these kids. We made sure to tell them they aren't always winners. We made them do their own homework. We monitored their Instagram account, and made them get jobs when they turned 16. And, yet, STILL - they would rather starve then throw some turkey between 2 slices of bread! I can't even begin to imagine what they will act like in the workplace in a few years.:badpc:
 
Last edited:
I am genuinely befuddled when people have such a negative view of millennials in the work place. We've hired three in the last year, and all three have been absolutely fantastic. They are hard working, inquisitive, and have way more initiative than many of my older employees. They're happy to learn just about anything I throw at them. Sure, it takes them longer to learn something than someone who's been at work a decade, but that's a function of their experience and education at this point in their lives, not a function of their generation.
These kids are well spoken, willing to work with anyone, know how to research things they don't already know, not afraid to speak up in a meeting or ask insightful (and sometimes not so insightful questions). They are a huge asset to our team.
And from what I can tell, we didn't manage to find some rare-out-of-the-norm millennials.
I have no doubt there are some millennials who are complete idiots, who feel entitled to everything, and who make their coworkers miserable - just as there are idiotic, entitled, miserable employees in every generation.

I agree, for the most part. We have 2 "Millennials" in my department - one is about 34 and the other is 29 - he started with us just before turning 21. He is being groomed for moving up in the company and can run circles around the 50 year olds who have been doing our job for 15-20 years! He and I have traditionally held the leadership roles in the dept, but I think he is edging me out lol and I am only 41!

The other one....ehhh...she is more of what a lot of people think of when they envision a typical millennial. Everything has to be discussed and "mean something" before she can do the task. She has a meltdown if she feels slighted or undervalued, and needs a reason for EVERYTHING I tell her. OMG.

Small sampling, for sure, so this is by no means a scientific study, but it's funny to see the amazing side of being a Millennial and the side that gives them a bad rap.

The rest of the Millennials in my company that I am in close contact with fall somewhere in the middle. Just like every big group of people. You have some winners, and some losers. Everyone else just wants to get along!
 
I agree, for the most part. We have 2 "Millennials" in my department - one is about 34 and the other is 29 - he started with us just before turning 21. He is being groomed for moving up in the company and can run circles around the 50 year olds who have been doing our job for 15-20 years! He and I have traditionally held the leadership roles in the dept, but I think he is edging me out lol and I am only 41!

A 50 year old who has only been doing a job 15-20 years is a rookie or on a second career or both.
 
A 50 year old who has only been doing a job 15-20 years is a rookie or on a second career or both.

Completely not the point of the post....use whatever # of years makes sense to you. Who's to say they didn't do the same job with a different company for 15 years before THAT, and got laid off....moved....whatever. Or moved up into my dept. We are not an entry level position. You have to have experience, and a really good degree. The guy started with us (the company) at age 21...he moved into our Dept about 5 years ago. He will finish his Masters in about 3 weeks. He runs circles around those who are older and have been in the industry since he was a small child.

Better?
 
Last edited:
A 50 year old who has only been doing a job 15-20 years is a rookie or on a second career or both.

??? My husband is in his early fifties and his longevity with his company in IT is so unusual it causes an uproar in team calls every year when his anniversary is acknowledged. Longevity within a company or an industry is no longer the norm it was in our parents' era.
 
??? My husband is in his early fifties and his longevity with his company in IT is so unusual it causes an uproar in team calls every year when his anniversary is acknowledged. Longevity within a company or an industry is no longer the norm it was in our parents' era.
True. My wife is 60 and has been in her job 38 years. We had 7 people at my place retire in 2016, 2 with 45 years service, so it is not unheard of. But 2 year employment contracts are the norm now, and since those retirements, none of their replacements has stayed past 2 years.
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top