Exactly. I don’t think it’s fair to say that people who were saying 20 something year olds should not necessarily get the vaccine before a 75 year old are so myopic that they can’t see the bigger picture. Maybe the bigger picture includes vaccinating those who are vastly more likely to require hospitalization, further drain resources, and are more likely to die.There is no "absolute" right way of handling things. It doesn't mean people can't see the big picture. There's a compelling case to be made for vaccinating older people first based on the fact that they are most vulnerable. It's the quickest way to drop the death rate. And the need for ICU beds.
You can also argue that a lot of jobs are essential that aren’t necessarily prioritized. Everyone is going to think their job is essential. What about those working in pharmaceutical manufacturing? What about truck drivers and fedex pilots? What about electrical lineman? They are just as essential. And in my opinion it’s hard to argue that a therapist working from home should get a vaccine before some other jobs just because they are medical.
Of course people are going to evaluate the vaccine tiers through their own life experience because that’s what they know. Just like the 20 year old IT person sees themselves as essential to society and can’t understand why a 80 year old who stays at home thinks they should get a vaccine before them. The 80 year old who has had to cut themselves off from contact with others for self protection is more likely to die without a vaccine and can’t see why the 20 year old gets it first.
Bottom line is, nobody is going to be happy until we have an abundance of supply and ability to deliver that supply. There are many ethical questions about how to prioritize and the answer is not black and white.