My comment is mostly related to people who post threads saying "I beat the Dining Plan" or "Here's my cost comparison" but don't tend to have the full numbers listed.
It often comes out in subsequent comments that the person was ordering to match the Dining Plan not choosing what they wanted in general. Comments like "well we wanted to go to X but it was a terrible place in terms of 2 credit usage" or "while we got the app and dessert we just picked at it because it was so much food". And because they don't have the full numbers listed when people are reading it they don't get the full story for their own benefit. People have different tipping habits so that part will differ but including how much you tipped overall would make an impact in terms of cost comparison.
Well habits and costs are two different things. You can habitually order an app and/or dessert, habitually order an alcholic beverage, habitually order a pop, habitually order the steak or lobster over the chicken, etc but the Dining Plan isn't configured in a way that all those stuff are added up tit for tat and we know that food and drink options change pricing sometimes multiple times after the Dining Plan price for a time frame is announced. The comments related to too much food tend to be related to personal habits. If someone is looking at the Dining Plan and wouldn't order an app and a dessert or wouldn't go to X type of place but does those things anyways because they have the Dining Plan then they are not necessarily choosing the plan that works for them and may be adjusting their habits to fit their square into a round hole that is the Dining Plan.
Maybe you would order steak at home but would you order steak at home if it was $54 (such as the filet of beef at California Grill)? Maybe you would have ordered that mimosa at home but would you order it at home if it was $11 (such as at BOG)? And so on down the line. I just picked random places and things--didn't want to spend too much time trying to find menu prices and items lol but you get the picture.
Guests can decide for themselves their personal dining habits but they don't get to decide the costs the Disney charges.
Yeah that's why I said
Really my main point is to include it in cost analysis.
Well sure..I think it may have been omitted in thought because I was bouncing off another poster but I frequently advise to include the full cost meaning tax and tips. The part that many people leave out in numbers comparisons is tip that's why it was specifically mentioned. So I'm not saying forget the tax and only add in tips I'm saying look at all of it together.
And multiple blog websites advise people to include tips. It just really makes the numbers more accurate and gives a more encompassing picture into the costs. People who aren't so much into exactly how much the plan costs and are instead much more interested in other facets of the Dining Plan may not see a point..but then again those people aren't so much into exactly how much the plan costs. If they would get the plan no matter the costs because of XYZ then maybe it doesn't make sense for them in their minds to include tips. But for other people's benefits it can make a difference-which was my main point.
You're not the type of person I'm talking about though
. You don't want to consider the finite details of the costs in terms of ordering something or not. But I've seen plenty of comments from people who do make it out like they've beat the Dining Plan on costs.....and most people agree...that's usually not the case usually because of those subsequent comments I mentioned earlier on in my comment and not including the whole bit (tax, tip and all).
Like I said I don't care why someone gets the Dining Plan so long as they understand why they get it. For you in particular cost seems to take a backseat to not having to worry about adding up the costs if paying OOP and/or wondering if you
really want that bun from Gastons.