If you're a "foodie" who is genuinely interested in different culinary experiences, Remy is likely worth it. If you just want a good meal in an attractive setting, Remy likely isn't worth it.So haven't cruised in 5 years and seems that the cost for eating at Remy is more than I remember. Is it worth it? Trying to make decisions would love advice.
If you're a "foodie" who is genuinely interested in different culinary experiences, Remy is likely worth it. If you just want a good meal in an attractive setting, Remy likely isn't worth it.
I'm in the latter category, and much prefer Palo. It's elegant and the food is good, without the gourmet pretensions of Remy. But if you want gourmet, go to Remy.
Victoria and Alberts is 185.00 per person plus tax for their prefix menu so I am not understanding your comment that it is “roughly the same cost??”I'm in the former category, but could not justify pulling the trigger at that price point myself. Not when Victoria and Alberts is roughly the same cost, without already covering the cost of a normal meal like I would be on a cruise ship.
And, I also feel that Palo is worth every penny of the upcharge.
Victoria and Alberts is 185.00 per person plus tax for their prefix menu so I am not understanding your comment that it is “roughly the same cost??”
For me it would depend on the length of the cruise. We're going on a three night and it is not worth the opportunity cost of missing out on one of the restaurants in the ordinary rotation. But on a longer cruise if there was a lot of repetition in the MDRs, I think it would be fun to try for a change of scene. Many of the add-on cruise activities (spa, port adventures, princess tea) will cost that much or more per person.